Intel Arc A570M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Intel Arc A570M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER occupy entirely different segments of the mobile and desktop graphics spectrum. The database records a single benchmark result for each, with the Arc A570M scoring 58,239 points in Geekbench OpenCL and the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scoring 6,269.5 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. These tests measure different workloads, so direct numerical comparison is not possible, but the underlying specifications and relative standings tell a clear story about their respective capabilities and intended uses.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database provides no shared benchmark results between these two products, so a direct head-to-head comparison on identical tests is unavailable. Each card was evaluated using different testing methodologies, which reflects their distinct design goals. The Intel Arc A570M was tested with Geekbench OpenCL, a compute-focused benchmark that stresses general-purpose GPU workloads. Its score of 58,239 places it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs in the database, indicating strong compute performance relative to the broader market.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER was tested with 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, a modern gaming and graphics workload. Its score of 6,269.5 places it at only the 36th percentile of all GPUs, which appears modest until examining its nearest rivals. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits within 0.9% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, the NVIDIA Quadro K620, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350, with deltas of 0%, -0.2%, and -0.9% respectively. This clustering suggests the Steel Nomad test may not fully represent the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's gaming prowess, or the test itself has a narrow scoring distribution among contemporary GPUs.

For the Intel Arc A570M, nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at -0.3% delta, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at +0.3%, the NVIDIA P102-100 at -0.5%, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 at -0.7%. These deltas demonstrate that the Arc A570M performs within a tight band around these established desktop and workstation cards in OpenCL compute, despite being a mobile-oriented chip with a 75 W TDP. The data shows the Arc A570M delivers compute throughput comparable to high-end desktop GPUs from previous generations, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's benchmark result aligns it with a different set of cards in a DX12 gaming context.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc A570M uses the DG2-256 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process, implementing the Xe-HPG architecture from the Alchemist generation. It contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, implementing the Blackwell 2.0 architecture from the GeForce 50 generation. This chip houses 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, achieving a much higher density of 120.6 million per square millimeter.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The Arc A570M runs at a 900 MHz base clock and 1300 MHz boost clock, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER operates at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost. Memory configurations diverge sharply: the Arc A570M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus delivering 896.0 GB/s. Both list their memory clock at 1750 MHz, but the effective data rates differ, with the Arc at 14 Gbps and the RTX at 28 Gbps.

Compute resources scale accordingly. The Arc A570M has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 raster output units, and 16 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 ray tracing cores, and 280 tensor cores. Pixel fill rates are 83.20 GPixel/s for the Arc versus 235.4 GPixel/s for the RTX. Texture fill rates are 166.4 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput measures 5.325 TFLOPS for the Arc and 43.94 TFLOPS for the RTX. FP16 performance is 10.65 TFLOPS for the Arc with a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX delivers 43.94 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, indicating full-rate FP16 on the NVIDIA part.

Power envelopes reflect their form factors. The Arc A570M is an integrated graphics processor design with a 75 W TDP, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot add-in card with a 350 W TDP and a single 16-pin power connector. The Arc uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the RTX uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs also differ, with the Arc being portable device dependent and the RTX offering 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc A570M wins in efficiency and compactness. Its 75 W TDP allows deployment in thin-and-light laptops or as an integrated graphics solution, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER demands a 350 W power delivery and dual-slot cooling. The Arc's 6 nm process and smaller die size of 269 mm² make it suitable for space-constrained designs, and its OpenCL score at the 88th percentile indicates strong compute capability for its power class. The Arc also has a lower transistor count at 11,500 million, which correlates with reduced manufacturing complexity for mobile applications.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in raw performance headroom and memory capacity. Its 16 GB of GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth provides four times the bandwidth of the Arc, which matters for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is over eight times higher than the Arc's 5.325 TFLOPS, and the 280 tensor cores enable accelerated AI workloads that the Arc lacks entirely. The RTX also has a 256-bit memory bus versus the Arc's 128-bit, and its 70 ray tracing cores dwarf the Arc's 16.

In gaming workloads, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's higher pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s position it for demanding titles at high settings. The Arc A570M's lower rates of 83.20 GPixel/s and 166.4 GTexel/s suit 1080p or medium-detail scenarios. The RTX supports PCIe 5.0 x16, doubling the bandwidth of the Arc's PCIe 4.0 x8, which reduces data transfer bottlenecks in bandwidth-sensitive applications.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher benchmark percentile?

A: The Intel Arc A570M ranks at the 88th percentile of all GPUs based on its Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER ranks at the 36th percentile based on its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,269.5.

Q: How do their memory specifications compare?

A: The Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is four times the bandwidth capacity.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a 75 W TDP and is designed as an integrated graphics processor. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 350 W TDP, requires a dual-slot form factor, and uses a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same API features?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER additionally includes 280 tensor cores for AI acceleration, while the Arc A570M has no tensor core count listed.

Q: How do their compute capabilities differ?

A: The Arc A570M delivers 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 and 43.94 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, making it roughly eight times faster in FP32 workloads.

Q: Which card has a larger die and more transistors?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 378 mm² die with 45,600 million transistors on TSMC's 5 nm process. The Arc A570M has a 269 mm² die with 11,500 million transistors on TSMC's 6 nm process.

The Verdict

The data indicates these are not competing products but solutions for different problems. The Intel Arc A570M, with its 75 W TDP and IGP form factor, targets mobile systems where power efficiency and compact size are paramount. Its 88th percentile OpenCL score shows that a low-power chip can still deliver respectable compute throughput, rivaling desktop cards like the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT within 0.3% in that specific benchmark. For users who need integrated graphics with strong compute performance in a laptop, the Arc A570M is the only viable option between these two.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a desktop-class card requiring a 350 W power budget and dual-slot cooling. Its 16 GB GDDR7 memory, 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance make it suitable for high-end gaming and compute tasks that demand substantial memory and throughput. The 280 tensor cores provide dedicated AI processing, and the PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures maximum bandwidth for data-heavy workloads. The launch MSRP is 749 USD.

Benchmark results show the Arc A570M sits above 88% of all GPUs in OpenCL compute, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's Steel Nomad score places it near the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 and Quadro K620. This suggests the RTX's gaming performance may be understated by that particular test, but the raw specification gap is undeniable. The RTX has over 4 times the shading units, 4 times the ray tracing cores, 8 times the FP32 throughput, and 4 times the memory bandwidth. Users with desktop space and power headroom will find the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vastly more capable. Users constrained to mobile platforms have only the Arc A570M as a realistic choice, and its compute score indicates it handles general-purpose workloads competently.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc A570M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | DG2-256 | GB203 |

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Generation | Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) | GeForce 50 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 11,500 million | 45,600 million |

| Die Size | 269 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 42.8M / mm² | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 900 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 2452 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 8960 |

| TMUs | 128 | 280 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 16 | 70 |

| Tensor Cores | N/A | 280 |

| Pixel Rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 166.4 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 5.325 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1) | 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 350 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | N/A | 1x 16-pin |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Release Date | 2023-07-31 | 2025-12-31 |

| Launch MSRP | N/A | 749 USD |