Intel Arc A570M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

The Intel Arc A570M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti are not competitors in any meaningful sense; they occupy entirely different tiers of the mobile and desktop GPU markets. The single shared benchmark in the data, Geekbench OpenCL, shows the RTX 5070 Ti delivering a score of 212,363 against the Arc A570M’s 58,239, a 72.6% advantage for NVIDIA. This is a one-sided comparison where the desktop GeForce card wins the only head-to-head test, yet the Arc A570M holds a higher percentile ranking (88th vs. 86th) among all GPUs, reflecting its position within the mobile integrated graphics landscape. The data shows the RTX 5070 Ti is a high-end desktop part, while the Arc A570M is a power-efficient mobile solution, and every architectural and performance metric reinforces that divide.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti wins the only direct benchmark comparison available, making it the clear choice for raw computational throughput. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 212,363 is 3.6 times higher than the Intel Arc A570M’s 58,239, a gap that dwarfs any other metric in the dataset. This performance level places it in the same league as the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which scores 58,392, and the NVIDIA P102-100 at 58,528 — meaning the Arc A570M is actually competitive with those parts, not the RTX 5070 Ti. The RTX 5070 Ti’s average benchmark score of 49,957 across ten tests further shows consistency, while the Arc A570M’s single benchmark average is 58,239.

The Intel Arc A570M’s advantage is not in performance but in efficiency and form factor. It carries a 75 W TDP versus the RTX 5070 Ti’s 300 W, and it is designed as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with portable-device-dependent display outputs, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti is a dual-slot, 304 mm desktop card requiring a 700 W power supply. For applications where space, power, and thermals are constrained — such as thin-and-light laptops — the Arc A570M is the only viable option in this pairing. The data shows no benchmark where the Arc wins, but its 88th percentile ranking versus the RTX 5070 Ti’s 86th suggests that within its own class, the Intel part is relatively stronger than the NVIDIA part is within the desktop segment.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is generational and fundamental. The Intel Arc A570M uses the DG2-256 chip built on TSMC’s 6 nm process, featuring 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million per mm². It employs the Xe-HPG architecture from the Alchemist generation, with 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 ray tracing cores. The memory subsystem is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its FP32 throughput is 5.325 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 10.65 TFLOPS in a 2:1 ratio.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is built on the GB203 chip using TSMC’s 5 nm process, packing 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die — a density of 120.6 million per mm², nearly three times that of the Intel part. The Blackwell 2.0 architecture fields 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. Memory is 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s — exactly four times the Arc A570M’s bandwidth. FP32 performance is 43.94 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 43.94 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio, indicating no FP16 penalty. The RTX 5070 Ti also uses PCIe 5.0 x16 versus the Arc A570M’s PCIe 4.0 x8, and its base clock of 2295 MHz with a 2452 MHz boost far exceeds the Arc’s 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost.

The process node advantage is clear: 5 nm versus 6 nm, with the NVIDIA chip achieving higher clock speeds and greater transistor density. The RTX 5070 Ti’s tensor core count of 280 is a feature the Arc A570M lacks entirely (listed as null), making the NVIDIA part substantially more capable for AI workloads, though no benchmark in the data directly tests that. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only head-to-head benchmark in the dataset is Geekbench OpenCL, and it is a decisive NVIDIA victory. The RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363 against the Arc A570M’s 58,239, a delta of -72.6% for the Intel part. This means the RTX 5070 Ti is approximately 265% faster in this compute test, translating to more than 3.6 times the raw OpenCL performance. For context, the Arc A570M’s nearest rivals in overall average score include the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392, just 0.3% higher) and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085, 0.3% lower), showing that the Intel mobile GPU is positioned near desktop parts from several generations ago.

The RTX 5070 Ti’s nearest rivals tell a different story. Its average benchmark score of 49,957 sits near the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50,001, 0.1% lower) and the Intel Arc A550M (49,737, 0.4% higher), but it is 3.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48,477). This places the RTX 5070 Ti in a performance band that includes last-generation high-end desktop GPUs, while the Arc A570M competes with the RX 6950 XT and NVIDIA P102-100 — a much older flagship and a workstation part, respectively. The data shows no scenario where the Arc A570M closes the gap; the RTX 5070 Ti’s victory in the sole head-to-head test is absolute.

Other RTX 5070 Ti benchmarks reinforce its compute strengths: it scores 32,974 in Passmark G3D, 20,203 in Passmark GPU Compute, and 225,122 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Arc A570M has no corresponding scores in these tests, so no further direct comparison is possible. The RTX 5070 Ti also delivers 235.4 GPixel/s pixel rate and 686.6 GTexel/s texture rate, versus the Arc A570M’s 83.20 GPixel/s and 166.4 GTexel/s — all from the specification data, not from any shared benchmark.

The Verdict

The verdict is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the superior performer, and the Intel Arc A570M is the superior efficiency solution. Anyone seeking maximum compute performance should choose the RTX 5070 Ti, as its Geekbench OpenCL score of 212,363 is 72.6% higher than the Arc A570M’s 58,239, and its FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS is over eight times the Intel part’s 5.325 TFLOPS. The RTX 5070 Ti also offers 16 GB of GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, four times the Arc’s 8 GB GDDR6 and 224.0 GB/s, making it the obvious pick for high-resolution gaming, rendering, or compute workloads.

However, the Arc A570M is not without merit. Its 75 W TDP is a quarter of the RTX 5070 Ti’s 300 W, and its IGP form factor means it can be integrated into portable devices where a dual-slot, 304 mm card with a 16-pin connector and 700 W PSU requirement is impossible. The Arc’s 88th percentile ranking versus the RTX 5070 Ti’s 86th suggests that, relative to all other GPUs, the Intel part is actually better positioned within its own niche. For a thin laptop where battery life and thermals matter more than raw FPS, the Arc A570M is the only logical choice. The data does not support any other conclusion: the RTX 5070 Ti wins on performance, the Arc A570M wins on efficiency and portability.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363, while the Intel Arc A570M scores 58,239, giving NVIDIA a 72.6% advantage.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each GPU provide?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti provides 896.0 GB/s from 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus; the Arc A570M provides 224.0 GB/s from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a 75 W TDP, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti has a 300 W TDP.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, compared to the Arc A570M’s 2,048.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the RTX 5070 Ti’s launch MSRP?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has a launch MSRP of 749 USD; the Arc A570M has no listed MSRP.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc A570M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |

|----------------|-----------------|----------------------------|

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 11,500 million | 45,600 million |

| Die Size | 269 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 42.8M / mm² | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 900 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 2452 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 8960 |

| TMUs | 128 | 280 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 16 | 70 |

| Tensor Cores | (none listed) | 280 |

| Pixel Rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 166.4 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 5.325 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1) | 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 300 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | (none listed) | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | (none listed) | 700 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Release Date | 2023-07-31 | 2025-02-19 |

| Launch MSRP | (none listed) | 749 USD |