Intel Arc A570M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 Comparison

Intel Arc A570M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 occupy very different positions in the database. The Arc A570M is a mobile-focused part from Intel’s Alchemist generation, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is a desktop GeForce 40-series card. Their recorded benchmark coverage is asymmetric: the Arc A570M has a single OpenCL score, and the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no recorded benchmark scores at all. This limits direct numerical comparison, but the available data still allows a methodical analysis of their relative standing, architecture, and specifications.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no shared benchmark results between the Intel Arc A570M and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104. The head-to-head benchmark list is empty, and neither card appears in the other’s nearest rivals. This means no direct performance delta can be computed from identical tests.

What does exist is a single Geekbench OpenCL score for the Arc A570M: 58,239 points. That result places the Arc A570M in the 88th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile, with no recorded tests. The absence of data for the NVIDIA card prevents any head-to-head win calculation: the database records 0 wins for each part.

For context, the Arc A570M’s nearest rivals in the database are all within a narrow band. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58,392, which is 0.3% higher than the Arc A570M. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085, which is 0.3% lower. The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58,528, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657, 0.7% higher. These deltas are small, indicating that the Arc A570M’s single recorded score clusters tightly with those four cards. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no nearest rivals listed, so its position cannot be assessed through that path.

Because the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 lacks benchmark entries, the only numerical comparison possible is against the field, not against each other. The Arc A570M’s 88th percentile is a strong standing, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104’s 50th percentile with zero score is uninformative. Any claim about one beating the other would require fabricated data, so the honest statement is that the database currently shows no head-to-head results.

Where Each One Wins

Without shared benchmarks, wins must be inferred from the recorded fields. The Arc A570M can be said to win in availability of measured performance: it has a concrete OpenCL score, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has none. That is a data-coverage win, not a performance win.

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 wins on several raw specification counts. Its shading units number 4,352 versus 2,048 for the Arc A570M. Its texture mapping units total 136 versus 128. Its ray tracing cores are 34 versus 16. Its tensor cores are 136, a feature the Arc A570M does not list. Its pixel rate is 121.7 GPixel/s versus 83.20 GPixel/s. Its texture rate is 344.8 GTexel/s versus 166.4 GTexel/s. Its FP32 throughput is 22.06 TFLOPS versus 5.325 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput is 22.06 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1). Its memory bandwidth is 288.0 GB/s versus 224.0 GB/s. Its boost clock is 2535 MHz versus 1300 MHz. Its base clock is 2310 MHz versus 900 MHz. All of these favor the NVIDIA card.

The Arc A570M wins on power efficiency, if the database’s TDP figures are taken as operational limits. Its TDP is 75 W versus 160 W for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104. The Arc A570M also wins on transistor density per square millimeter: 42.8M / mm² versus 121.8M / mm² is not a win for Intel, but the Arc’s die is smaller at 269 mm² versus 294 mm². The Arc A570M uses fewer transistors: 11,500 million versus 35,800 million. Those are not wins in performance, but they indicate a lighter silicon footprint.

In terms of production status, the Arc A570M is listed as Active, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is End-of-life. That gives the Intel part a status advantage in the database.

Architecture Differences

The Arc A570M uses Intel’s Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its chip is DG2-256, and it belongs to the Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) generation. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Its chip is AD104, and it belongs to the GeForce 40 generation.

The process node difference is small but real: 6 nm versus 5 nm. The transistor counts differ substantially: 11,500 million for the Arc A570M versus 35,800 million for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104. The die sizes are 269 mm² versus 294 mm², meaning the NVIDIA chip packs far more transistors into a slightly larger area. Transistor density reflects this: 42.8M / mm² for Intel versus 121.8M / mm² for NVIDIA.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 includes tensor cores (136) for AI workloads, a feature absent from the Arc A570M’s listed specifications. The Arc A570M has 16 ray tracing cores, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 34. The NVIDIA card’s FP16 rate matches its FP32 rate at a 1:1 ratio, whereas the Arc A570M halves FP16 throughput at a 2:1 ratio. This indicates a different compute architecture: Ada Lovelace does not sacrifice half-precision throughput, while Xe-HPG does.

Memory architecture is similar in width: both use a 128-bit bus. The Arc A570M uses GDDR6 at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed, yielding 224.0 GB/s. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses GDDR6 at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, yielding 288.0 GB/s. Both have 8 GB of memory. The NVIDIA card’s higher memory clock directly explains its bandwidth advantage.

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has a dual-slot design and one 16-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Arc A570M is listed as IGP (integrated graphics processor) slot width, with no power connector and no suggested PSU. Display outputs differ: the Arc A570M is portable-device dependent, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The NVIDIA card’s dimensions are recorded at 240 mm length, 111 mm height, and 40 mm width; the Arc A570M has no dimensions listed.

FAQ

Q: Does the database show any direct benchmark comparison between the Arc A570M and the RTX 4060 Ti AD104?

A: No. The head-to-head benchmark list is empty, and neither card appears in the other’s nearest rivals. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: What is the Arc A570M’s single benchmark score and how does it rank?

A: The Arc A570M scores 58,239 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are within 0.7%: the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 0.7% higher, the NVIDIA P102-100 is 0.5% higher, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is 0.3% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM is 0.3% lower.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 4,352 shading units, while the Arc A570M has 2,048. The NVIDIA card also has more texture mapping units (136 versus 128) and more ray tracing cores (34 versus 16).

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The Arc A570M has a TDP of 75 W, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has a TDP of 160 W. The Intel part consumes less power according to the database, but the NVIDIA card offers higher clock speeds and throughput.

Q: Do both cards support the same APIs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 additionally lists tensor cores, which the Arc A570M does not.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The Arc A570M is listed as Active, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is listed as End-of-life. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 had a launch MSRP of 399 USD.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Arc A570M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Chip | DG2-256 | AD104 |

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | Ada Lovelace |

| Generation | Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) | GeForce 40 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 11,500 million | 35,800 million |

| Die Size | 269 mm² | 294 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 42.8M / mm² | 121.8M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 900 MHz | 2310 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 2535 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 4352 |

| TMUs | 128 | 136 |

| ROPs | 64 | 48 |

| RT Cores | 16 | 34 |

| Tensor Cores | None listed | 136 |

| Pixel Rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | 121.7 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 166.4 GTexel/s | 344.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 5.325 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1) | 22.06 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 160 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 450 W |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 240 mm, 111 mm, 40 mm |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2023-07-31 | 2024-03-31 |

| Predecessor | None | GeForce 30 |

| Successor | None | GeForce 50 |

| Launch MSRP | None | 399 USD |

The ROP count is the only area where the Arc A570M exceeds the RTX 4060 Ti AD104: 64 versus 48. All other compute and memory specifications favor the NVIDIA card.

The Verdict

The database does not support a direct performance verdict between these two cards because the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no benchmark scores. The only recorded performance data belongs to the Arc A570M, which shows a strong 88th percentile OpenCL score of 58,239, nearly matching the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT.

From a specification standpoint, the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 dominates in raw compute: more than double the shading units, four times the FP32 throughput (22.06 TFLOPS versus 5.325 TFLOPS), higher clocks, higher memory bandwidth, and more ray tracing and tensor cores. It also carries a higher TDP of 160 W versus 75 W, indicating a design intended for desktop power budgets.

The Arc A570M is a mobile-part design with an IGP slot width, portable-device-dependent outputs, and no power connector. Its advantages are limited to lower power draw, a smaller die, and a higher ROP count. It also remains in Active production, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is End-of-life.

For a user choosing based on the database alone, the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 offers a far larger specification envelope, but its lack of benchmark data means its real-world performance cannot be confirmed here. The Arc A570M has a verified score that places it in the top 12% of all GPUs. The verdict is conditional: if raw throughput and features matter, the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is the stronger part on paper; if measured performance and active availability matter, the Arc A570M has the only recorded evidence.