Intel Arc A570M vs Intel Arc A580 Comparison

Intel Arc A570M and Intel Arc A580 are two Alchemist-generation GPUs from Intel, but they occupy different segments of the market. The A570M is a mobile part, while the A580 is a desktop card. Benchmark data shows the desktop A580 holds a decisive edge in raw compute, but the A570M remains competitive in the average score pool due to its own strengths.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc A580 is the clear winner in the single available head-to-head benchmark, claiming victory in the Geekbench OpenCL test. In this test, the A580 scores 91,657 against the A570M’s 58,239, resulting in a delta of -36.5% for the mobile part. This is a substantial gap, indicating that the A580 delivers roughly 57% more raw compute performance in this workload.

However, the average benchmark score tells a different story. The A570M has an average benchmark score of 58,239, while the A580’s average is 57,756. This means the A570M actually holds a slight edge in the aggregated score, with a delta of 0.8% in its favor. This suggests that while the A580 wins the single OpenCL test, the A570M may perform relatively better in other unlisted workloads that contribute to the average, or that the A580’s average is dragged down by other benchmarks.

The wins are split by metric. If the analysis focuses strictly on the head-to-head OpenCL result, the A580 wins. If the analysis considers the average benchmark score as a representative aggregate, the A570M wins by a narrow margin. The data shows that the A580 is the stronger choice for compute-heavy tasks, while the A570M’s average performance suggests it is not far behind in overall capability.

The Verdict

Based on the data, the Intel Arc A580 is the superior product for users prioritizing raw compute performance. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 91,657 is 36.5% higher than the A570M’s score, making it the clear choice for workloads that leverage OpenCL acceleration. The A580 also benefits from being a desktop part, which typically allows for more sustained performance.

The Intel Arc A570M, despite its lower OpenCL score, should not be dismissed. Its average benchmark score of 58,239 is 0.8% higher than the A580’s average of 57,756. This indicates that in a broader range of tasks, the A570M is essentially on par with its desktop counterpart, if not slightly ahead. For users who need a mobile solution, the A570M is the only option between the two, as the A580 is a desktop card.

The verdict is straightforward. If the user is building a desktop system and needs the maximum compute throughput, the A580 wins. If the user requires a laptop GPU or values the slightly higher aggregate average score, the A570M is the appropriate pick. The data does not support a universal recommendation; it depends entirely on the use case and form factor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct comparison available is the Geekbench OpenCL test. Here, the Intel Arc A580 delivers a score of 91,657, while the Intel Arc A570M scores 58,239. This represents a 36.5% advantage for the A580, a massive margin that underscores the difference in their compute capabilities.

This result is consistent with the underlying specifications. The A580 has 3072 shading units, while the A570M has 2048, a 50% difference. The A580 also has a significantly higher boost clock of 2000 MHz versus the A570M’s 1300 MHz. These factors combine to give the A580 a theoretical FP32 throughput of 12.29 TFLOPS, compared to the A570M’s 5.325 TFLOPS. The benchmark result validates these specifications.

Despite this loss, the A570M’s average benchmark score of 58,239 is higher than the A580’s average of 57,756. This is a curious data point. It suggests that the A580’s average is pulled down by other benchmark results not listed in the head-to-head section, or that the A570M performs better in other APIs like Vulkan or DirectX. The A580 does have a Geekbench Vulkan score of 79,381, but no comparable figure exists for the A570M in the data.

The delta of 36.5% in the OpenCL test is the largest measurable performance gap between the two. It is a significant margin that will impact any workload relying on OpenCL. For other workloads, the data is incomplete, but the average scores suggest a much closer competition.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has a significantly higher Geekbench OpenCL score of 91,657, compared to the Intel Arc A570M’s 58,239. This is a 36.5% difference in favor of the A580.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 58,239, while the Intel Arc A580 averages 57,756. This gives the A570M a 0.8% edge in the aggregate.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for both GPUs?

A: Both the Intel Arc A570M and the Intel Arc A580 are in the 89th percentile against all GPUs, indicating they are both high-performing parts.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has 3072 shading units, while the Intel Arc A570M has 2048. The A580 also has more texture mapping units (192 vs 128) and render output units (96 vs 64).

Q: Are there any other benchmark results for the A580?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A580 also has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 79,381. No comparable results are listed for the A570M.

Q: What is the form factor difference?

A: The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile GPU with an IGP slot width, while the Intel Arc A580 is a desktop card with a dual-slot design. The A580 also requires two 8-pin power connectors and a 450 W power supply.

Architecture Differences

Both GPUs are based on Intel’s Xe-HPG architecture, but they use different chips. The Intel Arc A570M uses the DG2-256 chip, while the Intel Arc A580 uses the DG2-512 chip. This is a fundamental difference, as the DG2-512 is a larger, more powerful die.

The process node is identical: both are built on TSMC’s 6 nm process. However, the transistor counts differ significantly. The A570M has 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, while the A580 has 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. This results in a higher transistor density for the A580 at 53.4M / mm², compared to the A570M’s 42.8M / mm².

The memory architecture also differs, despite both having 8 GB of GDDR6. The A570M uses a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, while the A580 uses a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This gives the A580 a significant memory bandwidth advantage, which is crucial for high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. They also feature ray tracing cores, with the A570M having 16 and the A580 having 24. Neither has tensor cores listed. The A580 has more of every execution unit, including shading units, TMUs, and ROPs, which explains its higher compute throughput.

Specification Differences

The specification differences between the Intel Arc A570M and Intel Arc A580 are substantial. The A570M is a mobile part with a boost clock of 1300 MHz, while the A580 is a desktop part with a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The base clocks are 900 MHz and 1700 MHz, respectively.

Memory specifications differ in clock speed and bandwidth. The A570M has a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), while the A580 has a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The bus width is 128-bit for the A570M and 256-bit for the A580, leading to bandwidths of 224.0 GB/s and 512.0 GB/s.

The compute specifications are heavily skewed toward the A580. The A580 has 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, compared to the A570M’s 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s for the A580 versus 83.20 GPixel/s for the A570M. The texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 166.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 12.29 TFLOPS for the A580 and 5.325 TFLOPS for the A570M, with FP16 at 24.58 TFLOPS and 10.65 TFLOPS, respectively.

Power and physical specifications also differ. The A570M has a TDP of 75 W and is an IGP, while the A580 has a TDP of 175 W and is a dual-slot card requiring two 8-pin power connectors and a 450 W power supply. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for the A570M and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the A580. Display outputs are portable-device-dependent for the A570M, while the A580 offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0.