GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A530M

CORE STATE DG2-256
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1300 MHz
TDP 65 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A400

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1762 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
49,735
22,844
geekbench_vulkan
43,492
22,237

Analysis: Intel Arc A530M vs NVIDIA RTX A400

Examining the test figures for Intel Arc A530M graphics card and NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A400 graphics card, a distinct trend unfolds. Intel Arc A530M graphics card reliably provides superior frame rates in this analysis. This rendering advantage extends from noticeable to outstanding depending on the given benchmark. This dependability points to underlying technical benefits. Those wanting rendering power might factor this in.

Playing games performance in diverse titles reliably benefit Intel Arc A530M graphics card. From esports games to heavy productions, Intel Arc A530M graphics card keeps its lead. This benchmark dependability over different titles shows fundamental design superiority. Players will expect excellent performance no matter of scenario. The capability is notable.

NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A400 graphics card isn't overlooked altogether, though its performance deficit versus Intel Arc A530M graphics card is hard to ignore. For cost-sensitive consumers, NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A400 graphics card can yet make sense assuming the reduced asking price adjusts for its lesser capabilities. However, for pure rendering throughput, Intel Arc A530M graphics card is the undisputed victor. The determination is obvious. Capability seekers would gravitate toward Intel Arc A530M graphics card.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A530M
RTX A400
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,536
768 -50.0%
Shaders
1,536
768 -50.0%
TMUs
96
24 -75.0%
ROPs
48
16 -66.7%
SM Count
6
Execution Units
192
Clocks
Base Clock
900 MHz
1417 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1762 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
4,096 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
224.0 GB/s
96.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
8 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
28.19 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.994 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
42.29 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
7.987 TFLOPS (2:1)
2.706 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
6 -50.0%
Tensor Cores
24
XMX Cores
192
Power
TDP
65 W
50 W
TDP (W)
65
50 -23.1%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ampere
GPU Name
DG2-256
GA107
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
6 nm
8 nm
Transistors
11,500 million
8,700 million
Die Size
269 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
42.8M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Length
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Arc A530M Details View RTX A400 Details