Intel Arc A380M vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a stark contrast between the Intel Arc A380M and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head results for these two specific cards, which is itself a significant finding. The absence of comparative scores means the analysis must rely entirely on the architectural specifications and derived performance ceilings recorded in the database.

The raw compute figures tell a one-sided story. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the Intel Arc A380M manages 4.096 TFLOPS. That places the LX PRO at exactly 6 times the raw floating-point output of the A380M. The gap is equally pronounced in FP16 work, where the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS against the A380M's 8.192 TFLOPS, again a 6:1 ratio. These are not incremental differences; they represent entirely different performance tiers.

Memory bandwidth reinforces the same conclusion. The LX PRO moves data at 432.0 GB/s across a 192-bit bus, while the A380M operates at 186.0 GB/s on a 96-bit interface. The LX PRO offers 2.32 times the bandwidth. Effective memory speed also differs: the LX PRO runs at 18 Gbps effective, the A380M at 15.5 Gbps effective. Even the memory pool diverges sharply, 24 GB versus 6 GB, a 4:1 capacity advantage for the LX PRO.

Pixel and texture throughput follow the same pattern. The LX PRO sustains 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The A380M manages 64.00 GPixel/s and 128.0 GTexel/s. Every fill-rate metric shows the LX PRO at exactly 3 times the A380M's output. The shading unit count reinforces this hierarchy: 6144 shading units on the LX PRO versus 1024 on the A380M, a 6:1 ratio that matches the FP32 gap. The LX PRO also fields 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs against the A380M's 64 TMUs and 32 ROPs.

Neither card has recorded benchmark scores in the database, and both sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The percentile field, however, appears to be a placeholder rather than a measured value, since both cards share the identical percentile despite their vastly different specifications. The database shows zero wins for either card in head-to-head competition, which again reflects the absence of comparative test data rather than a genuine tie.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark scores, the database's specification fields define the likely strengths of each card. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in every compute-heavy scenario. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 capability point to workloads involving large matrix operations, neural network inference, and scientific simulation. The 24 GB memory pool, combined with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, supports large datasets, high-resolution textures, and multi-model loading. The 192-bit bus width provides the headroom for sustained data streaming.

The Intel Arc A380M claims a different kind of victory: efficiency. Its 35 W TDP is dramatically lower than the LX PRO's 225 W. The A380M achieves its performance at roughly one-sixth the power draw. For portable devices, the MXM-A (3.1) form factor and 35 W envelope make it viable in compact chassis where the LX PRO's dual-slot 248 mm length and 225 W requirement would not fit. The A380M's 6 GB memory is modest, but adequate for lighter workloads such as mobile rendering, video decode, or entry-level creative tasks.

The A380M also carries a temporal advantage in the database. Its release date is recorded as January 23, 2023, while the LX PRO appears as March 16, 2026. The A380M has been in the field longer, meaning its driver ecosystem and software support have had more time to mature. The LX PRO's newer arrival suggests less real-world validation, though its specifications indicate it targets a different market segment entirely.

The LX PRO wins decisively in display output flexibility. It provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a connectors, enabling multi-monitor setups directly from the card. The A380M's display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning its connectivity depends on the host laptop or module carrier. For stationary workstations, the LX PRO's fixed outputs are a clear advantage.

Architecture Differences

The two cards share a manufacturing foundation but diverge completely in design philosophy. Both use a 6 nm process node from TSMC. That is where the similarity ends. The Intel Arc A380M uses the DG2-128 chip under the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation for Arc 3 Mobile. The A380M integrates 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a chip designated 7G105 under the "TrueGPU" architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. The database records its transistor count and die size as unknown, which complicates direct comparison. The LX PRO compensates with far more execution resources: 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, versus the A380M's 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs.

Ray tracing support marks another divergence. The A380M includes 8 dedicated RT cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The LX PRO lists no RT core count in the database, suggesting either the absence of dedicated ray tracing hardware or unreported specifications. This could matter for applications that rely on real-time ray tracing, such as certain 3D rendering pipelines.

API support shows partial overlap. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The A380M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO lists Vulkan 1.3. The newer Vulkan revision on the A380M may offer better compatibility with recently updated applications, though the practical difference depends on software adoption.

The LX PRO uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, the standard for desktop expansion. The A380M uses MXM-A (3.1), a module interface designed for laptops and small-form-factor systems. The LX PRO requires a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU, while the A380M has no external power connector listed, operating entirely within its 35 W envelope. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, occupying a dual-slot bracket. The A380M's dimensions are not recorded, reflecting its variable MXM implementation.

The Verdict

The data separates these cards into different product categories. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a high-throughput compute card. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 24 GB GDDR6 memory, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth place it in a class designed for demanding workloads that saturate memory and compute resources. The 6:1 ratio in shading units and FP32 throughput over the A380M is not a marginal advantage; it is a fundamental difference in positioning.

The Intel Arc A380M is a low-power mobile solution. Its 35 W TDP, MXM-A form factor, and 6 GB memory suit portable systems where power budget and physical size constrain options. The A380M's 8 RT cores provide ray tracing capability that the LX PRO does not document. The A380M also supports Vulkan 1.4, a newer specification than the LX PRO's 1.3.

For workloads that demand maximum compute throughput, large memory capacity, and high bandwidth, the LX PRO is the only choice supported by the recorded data. For portable or low-power environments, the A380M is the viable option. The power differential is stark: 35 W versus 225 W. The LX PRO needs a 550 W PSU and a 16-pin connector; the A380M draws power from its host module.

Both cards share the same process node and foundry, but their architectures target different physical and thermal envelopes. The LX PRO's dual-slot 248 mm card cannot replace the A380M in an MXM slot, and the A380M cannot match the LX PRO's throughput in compute-heavy tasks. The data does not suggest one is "better" in absolute terms; it shows two specialized tools for different jobs.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, exactly 6 times the Intel Arc A380M's 4.096 TFLOPS.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: The LX PRO has 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 18 Gbps effective memory speed. The A380M has 6 GB GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus with 186.0 GB/s bandwidth and 15.5 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Do both cards support ray tracing?

A: The Intel Arc A380M includes 8 dedicated RT cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO lists no RT core count in the database.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The A380M operates at 35 W TDP with no external power connector. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a suggested 550 W PSU.

Q: What bus interfaces do the cards use?

A: The A380M uses MXM-A (3.1), a mobile module interface. The LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16, a desktop expansion slot.

Q: Which card supports more display outputs?

A: The LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The A380M's display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent," meaning they vary by host system.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Arc A380M | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|-------|-----------------|---------------------|

| Chip | DG2-128 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile) | 7G100 |

| Transistors | 7,200 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 157 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 45.9M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 1550 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 6 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 96 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 186.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1024 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 64 | 192 |

| ROPs | 32 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 8 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 64.00 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 128.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 4.096 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 8.192 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 35 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | MXM Module | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | null | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | MXM-A (3.1) | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | not recorded | 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm |

| Release Date | 2023-01-23 | 2026-03-16 |