Intel Arc A380M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a single recorded benchmark for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER: the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it scores 6269.5 points. The Intel Arc A380M has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, and the head-to-head comparison list is empty, so direct comparative measurements between these two cards are unavailable from the recorded data.

What the database does show is where the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits relative to its nearest rivals. Its average benchmark score is 6270, placing it at the 36th percentile among all GPUs. The closest comparable card is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which averages exactly 6270 points, a 0% difference. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223, which is 0.8% behind the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 averages 6282, 0.2% ahead, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, 0.9% ahead.

The 36th percentile ranking indicates that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits below the median in the database's overall GPU distribution. However, its near-tie with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 suggests that within its immediate competitive neighborhood, the performance delta is negligible. The spread among the four nearest rivals is remarkably tight, with only 1.7 percentage points separating the fastest (Radeon R7 M350 at 6327) from the slowest (FirePro W600 at 6223).

For the Intel Arc A380M, the absence of benchmark data means no quantitative comparison is possible. The database records zero wins for either card in the head-to-head section, reflecting the lack of direct test results. What can be stated from the data alone is that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5, while the Arc A380M has no comparable entry.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs represent fundamentally different design philosophies and market positions. The Intel Arc A380M uses the DG2-128 chip built on the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation for Arc 3 Mobile. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, belonging to the GeForce 50-series generation. It is built on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC, with 45,600 million transistors spread across a 378 mm² die. The transistor density reaches 120.6 million per square millimeter, which is roughly 2.6 times denser than the Intel part.

The compute resources differ dramatically. The Arc A380M features 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 render output units, and 8 ray tracing cores. It has no dedicated tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER packs 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The shading unit count alone is nearly 9 times higher on the NVIDIA card.

Memory configurations also diverge sharply. The Intel card uses 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective), producing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, with memory at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The bandwidth advantage for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is approximately 4.8 times.

Clock speeds show the NVIDIA part running higher. The Arc A380M has a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost of 2000 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER operates at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost. Pixel and texture rates follow suit: the Intel card achieves 64.00 GPixel/s and 128.0 GTexel/s, while the NVIDIA card reaches 235.4 GPixel/s and 686.6 GTexel/s. Floating-point throughput is 4.096 TFLOPS (FP32) for Intel versus 43.94 TFLOPS for NVIDIA, a difference of roughly 10.7 times.

The API support is identical: both cards list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Power consumption differs enormously, with the Arc A380M rated at 35 W TDP and the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER at 350 W, a tenfold gap. The Intel card uses an MXM module form factor with MXM-A (3.1) bus interface, while the NVIDIA card is dual-slot, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and connects via PCIe 5.0 x16.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER dominates every measurable performance category in the database. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5 establishes a concrete performance baseline. The Intel Arc A380M has no recorded benchmark score, so no direct win can be attributed to it in the database's measurements.

The NVIDIA card wins on raw throughput metrics. Its FP32 compute of 43.94 TFLOPS is over ten times the Arc A380M's 4.096 TFLOPS. Texture fill rate of 686.6 GTexel/s versus 128.0 GTexel/s represents a 5.4 times advantage. Pixel fill rate of 235.4 GPixel/s versus 64.00 GPixel/s is a 3.7 times lead. Memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s versus 186.0 GB/s is a 4.8 times advantage.

The Intel card wins on power efficiency in absolute terms. At 35 W TDP, it draws one tenth the power of the 350 W NVIDIA part. The transistor count difference also favors Intel in terms of die size efficiency for its intended mobile segment, but the density metric favors NVIDIA at 120.6M per mm² versus 45.9M per mm².

The form factor distinction matters. The Arc A380M is an MXM module, designed for portable devices with display outputs described as portable-device dependent. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot desktop card with fixed display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b) and physical dimensions of 304 mm length, 137 mm height, and 48 mm width. Each card wins in its respective deployment scenario: the Intel part for compact mobile systems, the NVIDIA part for desktop workstations with expansion space.

The release timeline also separates them. The Arc A380M launched on 2023-01-23, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a release date of 2025-12-31. Both are listed as Active in production status.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every specification field. The Arc A380M belongs to no series, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is part of the GeForce 50-series. The chip names are DG2-128 versus GB203. Architecture is Xe-HPG versus Blackwell 2.0. Process node is 6 nm versus 5 nm, both TSMC.

Transistor count: 7,200 million versus 45,600 million. Die size: 157 mm² versus 378 mm². Transistor density: 45.9M per mm² versus 120.6M per mm². Base clock: 1550 MHz versus 2295 MHz. Boost clock: 2000 MHz versus 2452 MHz. Memory clock: 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Memory size: 6 GB versus 16 GB. Memory type: GDDR6 versus GDDR7. Bus width: 96 bit versus 256 bit. Memory bandwidth: 186.0 GB/s versus 896.0 GB/s. Shading units: 1,024 versus 8,960. TMUs: 64 versus 280. ROPs: 32 versus 96. RT cores: 8 versus 70. Tensor cores: none listed versus 280.

Pixel rate: 64.00 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 128.0 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32: 4.096 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS. FP16: 8.192 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1). TDP: 35 W versus 350 W. Slot width: MXM Module versus Dual-slot. Power connectors: none versus 1x 16-pin. Bus interface: MXM-A (3.1) versus PCIe 5.0 x16.

Display outputs differ: portable-device dependent for Intel, versus 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b for NVIDIA. Physical dimensions are absent for Intel, while NVIDIA lists 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm. Release dates: 2023-01-23 versus 2025-12-31. The launch MSRP for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is 749 USD; the Intel card has no listed launch MSRP.

The only identical fields are the API set (DirectX 12 Ultimate 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4), the production status (Active), and the manufacturer foundry (TSMC).

FAQ

Q: What benchmark score does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER achieve?

A: The database records a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, with an average benchmark score of 6270.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is exactly tied with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at 6270 points (0% delta). The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223 (0.8% behind), the NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282 (0.2% ahead), and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327 (0.9% ahead).

Q: Does the Intel Arc A380M have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Arc A380M, and its average benchmark score is 0.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between these two cards?

A: The Arc A380M uses 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus with 186.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8,960 shading units, while the Arc A380M has 1,024.

Q: What are the TDP values for each card?

A: The Intel Arc A380M has a TDP of 35 W. The NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear hierarchical relationship. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER outperforms the Arc A380M in every recorded performance metric, from shading units (8,960 versus 1,024) to FP32 throughput (43.94 TFLOPS versus 4.096 TFLOPS) to memory bandwidth (896.0 GB/s versus 186.0 GB/s). Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5 provides a concrete reference point, while the Arc A380M has no benchmark data to counter it.

The Arc A380M's advantages are limited to power consumption (35 W versus 350 W) and form factor (MXM module versus dual-slot desktop card). These attributes suit it for portable device integration, where the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER cannot physically fit. The NVIDIA card requires a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot, a 16-pin power connector, and 304 mm of length, making it a desktop-only solution.

The percentile ranking of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER at 36% among all GPUs suggests it sits below the median, yet its near-identical score to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 indicates consistency within its class. The tight clustering of its four nearest rivals, spanning only 104 points from lowest (6223) to highest (6327), shows that the 5070 Ti SUPER is not an outlier in its performance tier.

For users who need a mobile-oriented GPU with minimal power draw, the Arc A380M is the only option between these two given its MXM form factor and 35 W TDP. For anyone building a desktop system where space and power are available, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers roughly ten times the compute throughput, 4.8 times the memory bandwidth, and a verified benchmark score. The database contains no evidence that the Arc A380M can approach the NVIDIA card in any performance test. The choice reduces to deployment environment rather than performance parity, as the recorded data shows no overlap in capability between the two.