Intel Arc A380E vs NVIDIA RTX 6000D Comparison

Intel Arc A380E and NVIDIA RTX 6000D occupy opposite ends of the GPU spectrum. The database shows the Arc A380E as an end-of-life entry-level part with modest resources, while the RTX 6000D is an active, top-tier workstation accelerator. Their benchmark results, architectural choices, and physical requirements differ so sharply that they serve entirely different workloads. This analysis breaks down where each card wins, what the silicon differences mean, and how the recorded data supports each conclusion.

Where Each One Wins

The use-case split is defined by compute throughput and memory capacity. The RTX 6000D dominates every measurable performance category in the database. Its average benchmark score of 195,964 places it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs tracked, a position that indicates it is built for sustained, high-intensity parallel workloads. The Arc A380E, with no recorded benchmarks and a 50th percentile ranking, sits at the median of all GPUs, meaning it delivers roughly average performance for its class but nothing close to the RTX 6000D.

For workloads that rely on raw FP32 arithmetic, the RTX 6000D delivers 97.04 TFLOPS, while the Arc A380E provides 4.096 TFLOPS. That is a factor of roughly 23.7x in theoretical floating-point throughput. Rendering, simulation, and AI training tasks that depend on large matrix operations will overwhelmingly favor the RTX 6000D. The Arc A380E is suited for lighter duties: basic desktop acceleration, older game titles, or multi-display setups where its 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs and low power draw are assets.

Memory capacity further separates the two. The RTX 6000D carries 84 GB of GDDR7 on a 448-bit bus, yielding 1.40 TB/s of bandwidth. The Arc A380E has 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s. For datasets that exceed 6 GB, such as large language models or high-resolution 3D scenes, the RTX 6000D is the only viable option. The Arc A380E would fail to load such workloads entirely. For smaller tasks, the Arc A380E’s bandwidth is sufficient, but its pixel rate of 64.00 GPixel/s is far below the RTX 6000D’s 466.6 GPixel/s, limiting its output resolution and frame rate in graphics-heavy applications.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The Arc A380E uses Intel’s Xe-HPG architecture on the DG2-128 chip, part of the Alchemist generation (Arc 3). It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The RTX 6000D uses NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB202 chip, part of the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC, with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, yielding a density of 122.9 million per square millimeter.

The transistor count difference is stark: the RTX 6000D packs nearly 13 times more transistors than the Arc A380E. The die size is nearly five times larger. This scale difference directly explains the performance gap. The RTX 6000D also has a higher transistor density, indicating a more complex design that packs more logic into each square millimeter.

Clock behavior differs as well. The Arc A380E runs at a fixed 2000 MHz for both base and boost, with no variance. The RTX 6000D has a base clock of 1992 MHz and a boost clock of 2430 MHz, a 438 MHz headroom that allows dynamic performance scaling under load. Memory clocks also diverge: the Arc A380E uses 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective) GDDR6, while the RTX 6000D uses 1560 MHz (25 Gbps effective) GDDR7. The newer GDDR7 standard, combined with the wider bus, produces the 1.40 TB/s bandwidth advantage.

Compute unit counts reinforce the hierarchy. The Arc A380E has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units (TMUs), 32 raster output units (ROPs), and 8 ray tracing cores. The RTX 6000D has 19,968 shading units, 624 TMUs, 192 ROPs, 156 ray tracing cores, and 624 tensor cores. The Arc A380E has no tensor cores listed, which means it lacks dedicated hardware for AI acceleration. The RTX 6000D’s tensor cores enable mixed-precision workloads, a capability absent from the Arc A380E’s specifications.

Power and physical design also diverge. The Arc A380E has a 75 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and is a single-slot card measuring 254 mm by 127 mm by 20 mm. The RTX 6000D has a 600 W TDP, requires one 16-pin connector, is dual-slot, and measures 304 mm by 137 mm by 40 mm. The suggested power supply ratings are 250 W for the Arc A380E and 1000 W for the RTX 6000D. The bus interface differs: PCIe 4.0 x8 for the Arc A380E versus PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX 6000D, affecting data transfer rates to the host system.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Arc A380E and RTX 6000D. The Arc A380E has an empty benchmark list, so no scores are recorded for it. The RTX 6000D has two benchmarks: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3522 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 388405. Without matching tests for the Arc A380E, a direct comparison of these specific metrics is impossible.

However, the average benchmark scores provide a proxy. The RTX 6000D’s average benchmark score is 195,964, which places it in the 98th percentile. Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB with an average score of 194,415 (0.8% lower), the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB with 187,147 (4.7% lower), the NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB with 207,124 (5.4% higher), and the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation with 184,664 (6.1% lower). This cluster shows the RTX 6000D sits among top-tier data center and workstation accelerators. The Arc A380E, by contrast, has no nearest rivals recorded and a 50th percentile ranking, suggesting it falls in the middle of the overall GPU distribution but without any comparative scores to anchor its position.

The RTX 6000D’s FP16 performance is notable: it delivers 97.04 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning it does not halve throughput for half-precision work. The Arc A380E delivers 8.192 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, meaning it halves its FP32 rate for FP16. This difference matters for AI inference and scientific computing, where FP16 is common. The RTX 6000D’s tensor cores further accelerate these workloads, while the Arc A380E lacks that hardware entirely.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the RTX 6000D is designed for professional compute, AI, and high-end visualization, while the Arc A380E serves as a low-power entry point for basic graphics. The RTX 6000D’s 98th percentile ranking, 84 GB memory, and 97.04 TFLOPS FP32 make it suitable for tasks that require massive parallel processing and large datasets. The Arc A380E’s 50th percentile ranking, 6 GB memory, and 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 limit it to lighter workloads.

The RTX 6000D is the clear choice for anyone whose work involves training or running large neural networks, rendering complex 3D scenes, or processing multi-gigabyte datasets. Its 1.40 TB/s bandwidth and 624 tensor cores are essential for such tasks. The Arc A380E cannot handle these workloads due to insufficient memory and compute resources.

The Arc A380E is appropriate for systems where power consumption and physical footprint matter more than raw performance. Its 75 W TDP, single-slot design, and lack of power connectors make it easy to integrate into compact or low-power builds. It can drive up to four DisplayPort displays at 2.0 spec, which is adequate for multi-monitor productivity setups. Its 2000 MHz fixed clock indicates stable operation without boost variability.

The production statuses reinforce this split. The Arc A380E is end-of-life, with a release date of March 31, 2024, and a successor named Battlemage. The RTX 6000D is active, released July 13, 2025, with no successor listed. The RTX 6000D’s launch MSRP is 8,565 USD, a detail that can be stated once but does not alter the performance analysis. Neither card is positioned as a direct competitor to the other.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The RTX 6000D delivers 97.04 TFLOPS FP32, while the Arc A380E provides 4.096 TFLOPS FP32.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The RTX 6000D has 84 GB of GDDR7 on a 448-bit bus with 1.40 TB/s bandwidth. The Arc A380E has 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus with 186.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the Arc A380E have tensor cores?

A: No, the Arc A380E lists no tensor cores. The RTX 6000D has 624 tensor cores.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Arc A380E has a 75 W TDP and requires no power connectors. The RTX 6000D has a 600 W TDP and requires one 16-pin connector. The suggested power supplies are 250 W and 1000 W, respectively.

Q: Which card has better ray tracing hardware?

A: The RTX 6000D has 156 ray tracing cores. The Arc A380E has 8 ray tracing cores.

Q: What are the recorded benchmark scores for the RTX 6000D?

A: The RTX 6000D scores 3522 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 388405 in Geekbench OpenCL. The Arc A380E has no recorded benchmarks.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc A380E | NVIDIA RTX 6000D |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) | Blackwell PRO W (x000) |

| Process node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 7,200 million | 92,200 million |

| Die size | 157 mm² | 750 mm² |

| Transistor density | 45.9M / mm² | 122.9M / mm² |

| Base clock | 2000 MHz | 1992 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2000 MHz | 2430 MHz |

| Memory clock | 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective) | 1560 MHz (25 Gbps effective) |

| Memory size | 6 GB | 84 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory bus width | 96 bit | 448 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 186.0 GB/s | 1.40 TB/s |

| Shading units | 1024 | 19968 |

| TMUs | 64 | 624 |

| ROPs | 32 | 192 |

| Ray tracing cores | 8 | 156 |

| Tensor cores | None | 624 |

| Pixel rate | 64.00 GPixel/s | 466.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 128.0 GTexel/s | 1,516.3 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 4.096 TFLOPS | 97.04 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 8.192 TFLOPS (2:1) | 97.04 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 600 W |

| Slot width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 1000 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.0 | 4x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Dimensions | 254 mm x 127 mm x 20 mm | 304 mm x 137 mm x 40 mm |

| Production status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release date | 2024-03-31 | 2025-07-13 |

| Predecessor | Xe Graphics | Workstation Ada |

| Successor | Battlemage | None |

| Launch MSRP | None | 8,565 USD |

| Percentile vs all GPUs | 50 | 98 |

| Average benchmark score | 0 | 195,964 |

The recorded data shows no overlap in target usage. The RTX 6000D is a professional-grade accelerator with top-tier compute and memory, while the Arc A380E is a low-power consumer part with limited scope. Benchmarks, architecture, and physical specifications all point to the same conclusion: these GPUs are not competitors, they are solutions for entirely different problems.