Intel Arc A380E vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Comparison
Intel Arc A380E
GeForce RTX 5080
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Arc A380E vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
The Verdict
The database places the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in a completely different competitive tier from the Intel Arc A380E. The RTX 5080 sits at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, while the Arc A380E sits at the 50th percentile. The RTX 5080 is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark scores, and its average benchmark score of 56,083 dwarfs the Arc A380E's unrecorded baseline. The Arc A380E is an end-of-life product from the Alchemist generation, while the RTX 5080 is an active GeForce 50-series part.
For users seeking maximum rendering performance, the RTX 5080 is the clear choice. Its FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS is roughly 13.7 times the Arc A380E's 4.096 TFLOPS. The RTX 5080 also delivers 879.3 GTexel/s of texture fill rate versus 128.0 GTexel/s on the Intel part, and 293.1 GPixel/s versus 64.00 GPixel/s. The RTX 5080's nearest rivals in the database, the AMD Radeon 8060S and AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, sit within 0.7 percent of its average score, indicating the RTX 5080 is competitive within its immediate peer group.
The Arc A380E serves a different purpose entirely. Its 75 W TDP requires no power connectors and only a 250 W suggested PSU. The RTX 5080 draws 360 W and needs a 16-pin connector with a 750 W suggested PSU. The Arc A380E is also shorter at 254 mm versus 304 mm, and thinner at 20 mm versus 40 mm. For constrained systems where power delivery and physical space are the limiting factors, the Arc A380E is the only viable option in this pairing.
Where Each One Wins
The RTX 5080 wins in every measurable performance category. PassMark G3D score of 36,565 and PassMark GPU Compute score of 21,789 demonstrate strong general rendering and compute capability. Geekbench OpenCL score of 235,901 and Vulkan score of 255,450 show cross-API proficiency. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,637 indicates strong modern DirectX 12 performance. The RTX 5080 also has a larger memory footprint at 16 GB of GDDR7 versus 6 GB of GDDR6, a 256-bit bus versus 96-bit, and bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s versus 186.0 GB/s.
The Arc A380E wins in power efficiency and installation flexibility. Its 75 W TDP is one-fifth of the RTX 5080's 360 W. It uses no external power connectors, occupies a single slot, and measures 254 mm long, 127 mm tall, and 20 mm wide. The RTX 5080 is dual-slot, uses a 16-pin connector, and is larger in every dimension. The Arc A380E also provides four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, while the RTX 5080 offers one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.
The RTX 5080's transistor count of 45,600 million on a 378 mm² die gives it a density of 120.6 million transistors per mm². The Arc A380E packs 7,200 million transistors into 157 mm², a density of 45.9 million per mm². The RTX 5080 also has far more execution resources: 10,752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores versus the Arc A380E's 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 RT cores.
Architecture Differences
The two GPUs come from different architectural families. The Arc A380E uses Intel's Xe-HPG architecture on the DG2-128 chip, part of the Alchemist generation. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The RTX 5080 uses NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB203 chip, part of the GeForce 50 generation, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC.
The compute capability differs fundamentally. The Arc A380E delivers 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.192 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The RTX 5080 delivers 56.28 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. This means the RTX 5080 does not halve its throughput when switching to FP16, while the Arc A380E doubles its rate with reduced precision.
Memory architecture also diverges. The Arc A380E uses 6 GB of GDDR6 with a 96-bit bus and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at 1937 MHz with 15.5 Gbps effective speed. The RTX 5080 uses 16 GB of GDDR7 with a 256-bit bus and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at 1875 MHz with 30 Gbps effective speed. The RTX 5080's memory clock is lower in MHz, but the higher effective data rate and wider bus produce more than five times the bandwidth.
The RTX 5080 includes 336 tensor cores, which the Arc A380E lacks entirely. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 5080 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Arc A380E uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The RTX 5080's 84 RT cores versus the Arc A380E's 8 RT cores indicate a substantial difference in ray tracing throughput.
Clock behavior is also different. The Arc A380E has a flat clock profile with base and boost both at 2000 MHz. The RTX 5080 has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. The RTX 5080's boost clock is 30.85 percent higher than its base, while the Arc A380E shows no boost headroom in the recorded data.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute throughput?
A: The RTX 5080 delivers 56.28 TFLOPS FP32, which is approximately 13.7 times the Arc A380E's 4.096 TFLOPS. The RTX 5080 also maintains 56.28 TFLOPS in FP16, while the Arc A380E reaches 8.192 TFLOPS in FP16.
Q: How do the memory subsystems compare?
A: The RTX 5080 has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 960.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc A380E has 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus with 186.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5080 provides more than five times the memory bandwidth.
Q: What are the power requirements for each card?
A: The Arc A380E has a 75 W TDP, uses no power connectors, and requires a 250 W suggested PSU. The RTX 5080 has a 360 W TDP, uses one 16-pin connector, and requires a 750 W suggested PSU.
Q: Which card has more ray tracing cores?
A: The RTX 5080 has 84 RT cores. The Arc A380E has 8 RT cores. The RTX 5080 also includes 336 tensor cores, while the Arc A380E has no tensor cores listed.
Q: What is the physical size difference?
A: The Arc A380E measures 254 mm by 127 mm by 20 mm and is single-slot. The RTX 5080 measures 304 mm by 137 mm by 40 mm and is dual-slot.
Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The RTX 5080's average benchmark score of 56,083 is 0.6 percent above the AMD Radeon 8060S at 55,757 and 0.7 percent above the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB at 55,698. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by 2.2 percent, which scores 57,367.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Arc A380E and the RTX 5080. However, the RTX 5080 has ten recorded benchmark entries, and the Arc A380E has none. This absence of data for the Arc A380E is itself informative: the Intel part cannot be evaluated against the RTX 5080 using the same test suite.
The RTX 5080's strongest recorded result is the Geekbench Vulkan score of 255,450, followed by the Geekbench OpenCL score of 235,901. The PassMark G3D score of 36,565 and PassMark GPU Compute score of 21,789 show compute performance in a different test framework. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,637 represents modern DirectX 12 gaming workload performance.
The PassMark sub-scores for the RTX 5080 show an interesting distribution. DirectX 9 scores 389, DirectX 11 scores 324, DirectX 10 scores 208, and DirectX 12 scores 151. The 2D score of 1,415 is notably higher than any of the 3D DirectX sub-scores, indicating strong 2D compositing and desktop rendering capability relative to its 3D legacy API performance.
For the Arc A380E, the recorded data shows a peak FP16 rate of 8.192 TFLOPS, which is exactly double its FP32 rate of 4.096 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 128.0 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 64.00 GPixel/s correspond to its 64 TMUs and 32 ROPs at 2000 MHz. The RTX 5080's texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s is 6.87 times higher, and its pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s is 4.58 times higher.
The RTX 5080's 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration paths that the Arc A380E does not offer in tensor operations. The Arc A380E's 8 RT cores provide a minimal ray tracing presence. The RTX 5080's transistor density of 120.6 million per mm² versus 45.9 million per mm² reflects the process node difference between 5 nm and 6 nm, as well as architectural complexity.
The RTX 5080 releases on 2025-01-29, while the Arc A380E released on 2024-03-31. The Arc A380E is marked end-of-life with a successor named Battlemage, while the RTX 5080 is active with a successor named GeForce 60. The RTX 5080 has a launch MSRP of 999 USD. The Arc A380E has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.
The RTX 5080's percentile ranking of 87 places it well above the Arc A380E's 50th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 8060S, is nearly identical in average score with a 0.6 percent delta. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE leads the RTX 5080 by 2.2 percent. This puts the RTX 5080 in a tight competitive cluster where small percentage differences separate cards. The Arc A380E has no nearest rivals recorded, so its competitive position cannot be assessed with the same granularity.