Intel Arc A380E vs Intel Arc Pro A60 Comparison

Intel Arc A380E and Intel Arc Pro A60 are both Alchemist-generation GPUs built on Intel's Xe-HPG architecture, yet they occupy distinct positions in the product stack. The A380E targets entry-level embedded and edge applications with a compact, low-power design, while the A60 is a professional workstation part with substantially more compute resources and memory bandwidth. The database shows a significant performance gap between the two, reflected in their percentile rankings and benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 has an average benchmark score of 60326, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel Arc A380E has no recorded benchmark scores and sits in the 50th percentile, indicating the A60 delivers substantially higher measured performance.

Q: Which GPU has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The Arc Pro A60 features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc A380E has 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s, exactly half the bandwidth of the A60.

Q: How do the core configurations compare?

A: The Arc Pro A60 uses the DG2-256 chip with 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 16 ray tracing cores. The Arc A380E uses the smaller DG2-128 chip with 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores, representing half the resources in each category.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The Arc A380E runs at a fixed 2000 MHz for both base and boost clocks. The Arc Pro A60 has a lower 900 MHz base clock but boosts up to 2050 MHz, which is 50 MHz higher than the A380E's maximum.

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor count and die size?

A: The Arc Pro A60 houses 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, while the Arc A380E contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. Both are fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process, though the A380E achieves a higher transistor density of 45.9M per mm² versus 42.8M per mm² for the A60.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The Arc A380E is marked as end-of-life with a release date of March 31, 2024. The Arc Pro A60 is currently active in production, having been released earlier on June 5, 2023.

Architecture Differences

Both GPUs share the Xe-HPG architecture and belong to the Alchemist generation, but they use different physical chips. The Arc A380E is built around the DG2-128 die, while the Arc Pro A60 uses the larger DG2-256 die. This chip disparity leads to a doubling of execution resources in the A60: shading units go from 1024 to 2048, TMUs from 64 to 128, ROPs from 32 to 64, and ray tracing cores from 8 to 16.

The memory subsystem also differs fundamentally. The A380E pairs a 96-bit memory bus with 6 GB of GDDR6, while the A60 doubles the bus width to 192 bits and doubles capacity to 12 GB. This yields 384.0 GB/s versus 186.0 GB/s, a 2.06x bandwidth advantage for the A60. Memory clock rates are close, with the A380E at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective) and the A60 at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Clock behavior is another architectural distinction. The A380E maintains a constant 2000 MHz base and boost, reflecting a power-optimized design. The A60 operates with a 900 MHz base clock, likely for thermal management in professional workloads, but boosts to 2050 MHz, slightly above the A380E. Power delivery differs as well: the A380E has a 75 W TDP with no power connectors, while the A60 has a 130 W TDP and a suggested 300 W PSU, indicating a need for dedicated power input.

The PCIe interface also separates these cards. The A380E uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the A60 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, doubling the available host bandwidth. Both support identical API sets: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs match at 4x DisplayPort 2.0, and both are single-slot designs, though the A380E has recorded dimensions of 254 mm length, 127 mm height, and 20 mm width, while the A60's dimensions are not listed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Arc A380E and Intel Arc Pro A60. However, the Arc Pro A60 has two recorded benchmark results from Geekbench: an OpenCL score of 63485 and a Vulkan score of 57166, yielding an average score of 60326. The Arc A380E has no benchmark entries, so direct numerical comparison relies on the A60's placement among its nearest rivals.

The A60's average score of 60326 places it near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, which averages 60347, a delta of 0%. This is a striking result, indicating the professional A60 performs within a rounding error of the flagship consumer GPU in the database's aggregate scoring. Against AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48, which scores 60140, the A60 is ahead by 0.3%. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M outscores the A60 by 2.5% with 61896, while the A60 leads the AMD Radeon PRO V710 by 2.8%, as that card scores 58657.

In the absence of direct A380E benchmark data, the percentile rankings provide the clearest signal. The A60 sits in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, while the A380E is at the 50th percentile. This gap suggests the A380E delivers roughly median performance while the A60 approaches top-tier levels. The A60's Vulkan score of 57166 is notably lower than its OpenCL score of 63485, a 11% difference, indicating the card's performance varies significantly by API workload.

The A380E's fixed 2000 MHz clock and half-width memory bus would theoretically limit its throughput, but without recorded scores, the database cannot quantify the exact margin. The A60's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 compute versus the A380E's 4.096 TFLOPS, a 2.05x ratio, aligns with the doubling of shading units and suggests a similar scaling in raw compute-bound tasks.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The chip designates the largest divergence: DG2-128 for the A380E versus DG2-256 for the A60. Transistor counts follow accordingly, with 7,200 million versus 11,500 million, and die sizes of 157 mm² versus 269 mm². Transistor density slightly favors the A380E at 45.9M per mm² versus 42.8M per mm².

Clock speeds show a mixed picture. The A380E holds a constant 2000 MHz for base and boost, while the A60 starts at 900 MHz base and reaches 2050 MHz boost. Memory clocks are 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective) for the A380E and 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) for the A60. Memory capacity doubles from 6 GB to 12 GB, bus width from 96-bit to 192-bit, and bandwidth from 186.0 GB/s to 384.0 GB/s.

Execution resources double across the board: shading units 1024 to 2048, TMUs 64 to 128, ROPs 32 to 64, and ray tracing cores 8 to 16. Pixel rate rises from 64.00 GPixel/s to 131.2 GPixel/s, texture rate from 128.0 GTexel/s to 262.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 from 4.096 TFLOPS to 8.397 TFLOPS. FP16 also scales from 8.192 TFLOPS to 16.79 TFLOPS, both at a 2:1 ratio.

Power specifications differ significantly: the A380E has a 75 W TDP with no power connectors and a suggested 250 W PSU, while the A60 has a 130 W TDP and a suggested 300 W PSU. The bus interface goes from PCIe 4.0 x8 to PCIe 4.0 x16. The A380E includes physical dimensions of 254 mm by 127 mm by 20 mm, while the A60 records no dimensions. Production status separates them as end-of-life versus active, with release dates of March 31, 2024, and June 5, 2023, respectively.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro A60 wins in every measurable performance category. Its 12 GB memory capacity and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for large datasets and high-resolution textures common in professional visualization and compute workloads. The 2048 shading units and 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provide double the raw compute of the A380E, which matters for rendering, simulation, and machine learning inference tasks that scale with shading resources. The 16 ray tracing cores enable more complex ray-traced scenes, and the 131.2 GPixel/s fill rate supports high-resolution output.

The A60's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface doubles host bandwidth compared to the A380E's x8 link, reducing data transfer bottlenecks for workloads that stream geometry or buffers from system memory. Its 88th percentile ranking and benchmark scores rivaling the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, with a 0% delta in average score, indicate professional-grade performance that the A380E cannot approach based on its 50th percentile standing.

The Intel Arc A380E wins on power efficiency and physical integration. Its 75 W TDP requires no power connectors, simplifying installation in embedded systems or compact chassis where power delivery and cooling are constrained. The 250 W suggested PSU versus 300 W for the A60 reflects lower system power requirements. The A380E also achieves a higher transistor density of 45.9M per mm², indicating a more efficient use of silicon area. Its fixed 2000 MHz clock eliminates boost variability, which may be desirable for deterministic timing in industrial or edge applications. The smaller die size of 157 mm² and recorded dimensions of 254 mm length allow for easier fitment in space-limited enclosures.

The A380E's generation label "Arc 3" positions it as an entry-tier product, while the A60's "Pro Series" designation targets professional environments. For tasks that require sustained low-power operation or minimal cooling, the A380E holds the advantage. For any performance-sensitive workload, the A60 dominates based on the available data.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Arc Pro A60 delivers 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 compute, 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 12 GB of GDDR6, resulting in an average benchmark score of 60326 and an 88th percentile ranking. Its nearest rival comparison shows parity with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 at a 0% delta and a 2.8% lead over the AMD Radeon PRO V710. These figures confirm the A60 as a high-performance professional GPU capable of competing with top-tier consumer and workstation cards.

The Intel Arc A380E offers 4.096 TFLOPS FP32, 186.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 6 GB of memory, with no recorded benchmark scores and a 50th percentile placement. Its specifications represent exactly half the A60's execution resources and memory throughput, suggesting a linear performance relationship in compute-bound tasks. The constant 2000 MHz clock and 75 W TDP make it a low-power option, but the absence of benchmark data leaves its real-world performance unquantified in the database.

Users requiring maximum compute, memory capacity, and bandwidth should select the Arc Pro A60. Its active production status and benchmark-verified performance make it suitable for demanding professional workloads. Users prioritizing minimal power draw, no external power connectors, and compact dimensions should consider the A380E, despite its end-of-life status and lack of recorded performance data. The A60's 88th percentile versus the A380E's 50th percentile encapsulates the performance gap: the A60 is a top-tier performer, while the A380E sits at median level.