GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A380

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz
TDP 75 W
BUS WIDTH 96 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A400

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1762 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
808
N/A
geekbench_opencl
38,224
22,844
geekbench_vulkan
36,736
22,237
passmark_directx_10
37
32
passmark_directx_11
38
37
passmark_directx_12
35
27
passmark_directx_9
73
87
passmark_g2d
610
899
passmark_g3d
6,252
5,983
passmark_gpu_compute
2,762
2,557

Analysis: Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

For this graphics card battle, Intel's Arc A380 shows its dominance decisively. Whether you're rendering at 1080p, Intel's Arc A380 consistently exceeds NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 by notable gaps. The benchmark margin widens even more at demanding quality levels. This GPU executes heavy games with grace. The engineering superiority are clear.

NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 struggles to keep up with Intel's Arc A380's raw power. In price-conscious builders, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 can still deliver acceptable capability, though people demanding premium experience might invest toward Intel's Arc A380. This gaming gap is sufficiently notable to dismiss. Heavy games especially highlight this gap. This premium returns benefits in frame rates.

Playing games tests across various titles repeatedly support Intel's Arc A380. From fast-paced titles to demanding productions, Intel's Arc A380 keeps its advantage. This performance consistency over diverse games demonstrates inherent engineering superiority. Enthusiasts might expect excellent results regardless of genre. This adaptability is notable.

Overall, Intel's Arc A380 delivers the better choice in this evaluation. The gaming advantages warrant evaluation for anyone building a powerful rendering build. While NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A400 offers its strengths, this score figures clearly advantages Intel's Arc A380. Base your decision accordingly. This benchmark difference is substantial enough to matter.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A380
RTX A400
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
768 -25.0%
Shaders
1,024
768 -25.0%
TMUs
64
24 -62.5%
ROPs
32
16 -50.0%
SM Count
6
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1417 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1762 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
6 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
6,144
4,096 -33.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
96 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
186.0 GB/s
96.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
28.19 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.198 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
42.29 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)
2.706 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
6 -25.0%
Tensor Cores
24
XMX Cores
128
Power
TDP
75 W
50 W
TDP (W)
75
50 -33.3%
Suggested PSU
250 W
250 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ampere
GPU Name
DG2-128
GA107
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
6 nm
8 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
8,700 million
Die Size
157 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
45.9M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.6
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
222 mm 8.7 inches
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
114 mm 4.5 inches
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
149 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Xe Graphics
Quadro Turing
Successor
Battlemage
Workstation Ada
View Arc A380 Details View RTX A400 Details