Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile Comparison

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is in a completely different performance class than the Intel Arc A370M. Across the two shared tests, NVIDIA wins decisively, with the Intel part trailing by over 70% in each instance. The Arc A370M’s average benchmark score of 29,175 places it at the 74th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX 4070 Mobile, despite a slightly lower percentile rank of 73, delivers a far higher absolute score in the tests that matter most for modern workloads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is in Geekbench OpenCL, where the RTX 4070 Mobile scores 109,197 against the Arc A370M’s 29,676. That is a delta of -72.8% for the Intel part, meaning NVIDIA’s mobile GPU is roughly 3.7 times faster in raw compute throughput as measured by this test. The gap is nearly identical in Geekbench Vulkan: NVIDIA scores 108,367 versus Intel’s 28,673, a -73.5% delta. There are no benchmark categories where the Arc A370M wins; the head-to-head table shows zero wins for Intel and two for NVIDIA.

What makes these numbers more telling is the context from the rivals lists. The Arc A370M’s average score of 29,175 sits within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29,197) and AMD FirePro W8000 (29,211), and it is actually 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28,996). Meanwhile, the RTX 4070 Mobile’s average score of 27,435 is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (27,425) and within 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (27,565). This means the Intel part competes with integrated-class and older discrete GPUs, while the NVIDIA part trades blows with desktop-class flagship hardware from the previous generation.

The Vulkan results reinforce the same conclusion. A 73.5% deficit in Vulkan is particularly damaging for the Arc A370M because Vulkan is a low-overhead API that tends to favor architectures with strong driver efficiency and high shader throughput. The RTX 4070 Mobile’s 108,367 score in Vulkan is nearly identical to its OpenCL result, suggesting consistent performance across API boundaries. The Arc A370M’s two scores are also close to each other (29,676 and 28,673), but both are anchored at a level that is simply not competitive with the Ada Lovelace part.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has a higher average benchmark score of 29,175, compared to 27,435 for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile. However, this average is based on only two Geekbench tests, while the NVIDIA part has nine benchmark entries, including Passmark tests where it scores 19,587 in G3D and 8,399 in compute.

Q: How large is the performance gap in Geekbench Vulkan?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile scores 108,367 in Geekbench Vulkan, while the Arc A370M scores 28,673. The delta is -73.5%, meaning NVIDIA is approximately 3.8 times faster in this specific test.

Q: Does the Arc A370M beat any of its nearest rivals?

A: Yes, the Arc A370M’s average score of 29,175 is 0.6% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 470’s 28,996. It is also effectively tied with the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and AMD FirePro W8000, with deltas of -0.1% for both.

Q: What is the percentile rank of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A370M is at the 74th percentile of all GPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is at the 73rd percentile. Despite the lower percentile, the NVIDIA part has far higher absolute scores in the shared benchmarks.

Q: Are there any benchmark tests where the Intel GPU wins?

A: No. In the two head-to-head tests available (Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile wins both. The wins counter shows 0 for Intel and 2 for NVIDIA.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Mobile compare to a desktop RTX 3090?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile’s average score of 27,435 is 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090’s 27,565, making them statistically equivalent in this benchmark database.

Where Each One Wins

The data does not support a single use case where the Intel Arc A370M outperforms the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile. In compute-heavy workloads, the RTX 4070 Mobile’s OpenCL score of 109,197 versus 29,676 for the Arc A370M indicates a massive advantage for tasks like rendering, physics simulation, or any GPU-accelerated application that leverages OpenCL. The Vulkan result (108,367 versus 28,673) extends that dominance to gaming and real-time graphics APIs where Vulkan is the standard.

For the Arc A370M, the only meaningful “win” is relative to its own peer group. Its 0.6% edge over the AMD Radeon RX 470 and near-ties with the RX Vega M GH and FirePro W8000 show it is a viable option for lightweight, integrated-class workloads. But against the RTX 4070 Mobile, there is no scenario in the benchmark data where the Intel part takes the lead. The NVIDIA GPU’s additional benchmark coverage—including Passmark G3D at 19,587 and compute at 8,399—further demonstrates its ability to handle a broader range of tasks, while the Arc A370M has no corresponding data points.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ substantially in almost every measurable specification. The RTX 4070 Mobile has 4,608 shading units versus 1,024 for the Arc A370M, and its texture mapping units number 144 against 64. Raster output units are 48 versus 32. Memory capacity is 8 GB versus 4 GB, with the NVIDIA part using a 128-bit bus compared to 64-bit, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth versus 112.0 GB/s. The RTX 4070 Mobile also has 36 ray tracing cores and 144 tensor cores; the Arc A370M lists 8 ray tracing cores and no tensor core count.

Clock speeds tell a nuanced story. The Arc A370M has a higher base clock (1550 MHz versus 1395 MHz) and a higher boost clock (2050 MHz versus 1695 MHz). Yet the RTX 4070 Mobile still achieves far higher throughput because its raw execution resources are over four times larger. The NVIDIA GPU’s memory clock is 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) for Intel. Power consumption also differs sharply: the RTX 4070 Mobile is rated at 115 W TDP, while the Arc A370M is 35 W. Both use a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, and both are classified as IGP slot width with portable-device-dependent display outputs.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap is as wide as the performance gap. The Arc A370M is built on Intel’s Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The RTX 4070 Mobile uses NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD106 chip, on TSMC’s 5 nm process. That chip packs 22,900 million transistors into a 188 mm² die, for a density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The 5 nm node allows NVIDIA to fit over three times the transistors into only a slightly larger die.

The Intel part is from the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 Mobile) and is now end-of-life, having been released on 2022-03-29. The NVIDIA part belongs to the GeForce 40 Mobile generation, released on 2023-01-02, and is still active in production. Its predecessor is GeForce 30 Mobile and its successor is GeForce 50 Mobile. Feature-wise, the RTX 4070 Mobile’s 144 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated workloads that the Arc A370M cannot match, and its 36 ray tracing cores versus 8 gives it a substantial advantage in ray-traced scenes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical, but the underlying hardware execution capacity is not remotely comparable.

The Verdict

The choice between these two GPUs is not a choice at all if performance is the criterion. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile wins every benchmark it shares with the Intel Arc A370M, with deficits of 72.8% in OpenCL and 73.5% in Vulkan for the Intel part. The RTX 4070 Mobile’s 8 GB of memory, 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and 144 tensor cores make it suitable for demanding gaming, content creation, and AI workloads. Its average score rivals desktop GPUs like the RTX 3090, placing it in a performance tier that the Arc A370M cannot approach.

The Intel Arc A370M is a 35 W part with 4 GB of memory and a 64-bit bus, designed for thin-and-light systems. Its benchmark scores place it alongside AMD’s RX Vega M GH and RX 470, which is respectable for its power class but not relevant to anyone comparing it against a 115 W Ada Lovelace GPU. The only reason to select the Arc A370M would be extreme power constraints or a system design that specifically requires its integrated form factor, but even then, the data shows it delivers only a fraction of the performance. Buyers seeking maximum GPU capability in a mobile platform should pick the RTX 4070 Mobile without hesitation; the Arc A370M wins no category in this comparison.