GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A310

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1750 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

L40

CORE STATE AD102
VRAM 48 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2490 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
30,607
330,926
geekbench_vulkan
28,964
237,295
passmark_directx_10
31
N/A
passmark_directx_11
33
N/A
passmark_directx_12
29
N/A
passmark_directx_9
69
N/A
passmark_g2d
625
N/A
passmark_g3d
5,433
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
2,157
N/A

Analysis: Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA L40

For this graphics card matchup, NVIDIA L40 (NVIDIA) demonstrates its dominance decisively. If you're gaming at 1440p, NVIDIA L40 (NVIDIA) consistently outperforms the Arc A310 by significant percentages. This benchmark gap grows notably wider at elevated settings. This card handles demanding scenarios with grace. Its design benefits are evident.

Playing games performance across different scenarios consistently advantage NVIDIA L40 (NVIDIA). Whether it's multiplayer games to blockbuster games, NVIDIA L40 (NVIDIA) maintains its superiority. This performance reliability in multiple scenarios indicates inherent technical superiority. Gamers should anticipate capable frame rates independent of title. The versatility is remarkable.

This memory edge of NVIDIA L40 (NVIDIA) turns more critical at demanding settings. Demanding workloads requires considerable memory, and NVIDIA L40 (NVIDIA) has additional capacity. The converts into enhanced frame rates in VRAM-hungry scenarios. Next-gen games might only demand additional video memory. This edge expands over the years.

All things considered, NVIDIA L40 (NVIDIA) represents the better pick in this analysis. Its frame rate edges warrant examination for users building a demanding gaming system. Even though the Arc A310 possesses its positives, the benchmark results undeniably benefits NVIDIA L40 (NVIDIA). Reach your choice considering this. The benchmark margin is considerable sufficiently to impact.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A310
L40
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
18,176 +2266.7%
Shaders
768
18,176 +2266.7%
TMUs
32
568 +1675.0%
ROPs
16
192 +1100.0%
SM Count
142
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
1750 MHz
735 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
2490 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
48 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
49,152 +1100.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
384 bit
Bandwidth
124.0 GB/s
864.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
96 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
478.1 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
1,414.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
2.688 TFLOPS
90.52 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
672.0 GFLOPS (1:4)
1,414.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
5.376 TFLOPS (2:1)
90.52 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
142 +2266.7%
Tensor Cores
568
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
30 W
300 W
TDP (W)
30
300 +900.0%
Suggested PSU
200 W
700 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
DG2-128
AD102
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3)
Server Ada (Lxx)
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
76,300 million
Die Size
157 mm²
609 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
45.9M / mm²
125.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
111 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Xe Graphics
Server Ampere
Successor
Battlemage
Server Hopper
View Arc A310 Details View L40 Details