GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A310

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1750 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

CORE STATE AD103
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1695 MHz
TDP 120 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
30,607
180,831
geekbench_vulkan
28,964
170,774
passmark_directx_10
31
173
passmark_directx_11
33
262
passmark_directx_12
29
107
passmark_directx_9
69
310
passmark_g2d
625
984
passmark_g3d
5,433
27,212
passmark_gpu_compute
2,157
12,347

Analysis: Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

If analyzing RTX 4090 by NVIDIA to Intel's Arc A310 graphics, a gaming difference grows quickly visible. RTX 4090 by NVIDIA secures the lead in virtually each game we ran. The gap is considerable enough to change real-world visual results. Users might observe enhanced performance. This determination is straightforward.

For ray tracing, RTX 4090 by NVIDIA pulls further forward of Intel's Arc A310 graphics. The hardware accelerators manage complex reflection computations far more efficiently. Players looking for next-gen visuals will certainly favor RTX 4090 by NVIDIA. This RT advantage is substantial. Modern releases continually take advantage of ray tracing technology.

The memory benefit of RTX 4090 by NVIDIA gets increasingly critical at increased detail settings. High resolution workloads needs substantial memory, and RTX 4090 by NVIDIA provides more capability. This leads into smoother performance in VRAM-hungry games. Modern releases can increasingly consume more VRAM. The edge grows over time.

Intel's Arc A310 graphics cannot be ignored entirely, though its gaming gap relative to RTX 4090 by NVIDIA is challenging to deny. For cost-sensitive users, Intel's Arc A310 graphics might still make value if the lesser price accounts for the reduced performance. However, for raw rendering throughput, RTX 4090 by NVIDIA stands as the definite victor. The determination is straightforward. Speed seekers should move toward RTX 4090 by NVIDIA.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A310
RTX 4090 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
9,728 +1166.7%
Shaders
768
9,728 +1166.7%
TMUs
32
304 +850.0%
ROPs
16
112 +600.0%
SM Count
76
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
1750 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1695 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
16,384 +300.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
124.0 GB/s
576.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
64 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
189.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
515.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
2.688 TFLOPS
32.98 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
672.0 GFLOPS (1:4)
515.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
5.376 TFLOPS (2:1)
32.98 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
76 +1166.7%
Tensor Cores
304
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
30 W
120 W
TDP (W)
30
120 +300.0%
Suggested PSU
200 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
DG2-128
AD103
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3)
GeForce 40 Mobile
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
45,900 million
Die Size
157 mm²
379 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
45.9M / mm²
121.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
IGP
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Xe Graphics
GeForce 30 Mobile
Successor
Battlemage
GeForce 50 Mobile
View Arc A310 Details View GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Details