Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER Comparison

Intel Arc 140T Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER occupy opposite extremes of the mobile and desktop graphics spectrum. The Arc 140T is an integrated processor graphics solution built for thin-and-light laptops, while the RTX 5070 SUPER is a high-end discrete add-in board. Benchmark data shows the RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs. The Intel Arc 140T has no recorded benchmark scores, placing it at the 50th percentile by default, though this reflects absent data rather than measured performance. The comparison below relies strictly on the recorded specifications and the single benchmark result available.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile is for systems where power draw and integration matter more than raw frame rates. Its 35 W TDP and IGP slot width mean it is designed to be soldered onto a processor, using system memory for both capacity and bandwidth. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, with its 275 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, 1x 16-pin power connector, and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, is for desktop builds that can supply power and cooling. The RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance against the Arc 140T's 4.813 TFLOPS, a 6.7x difference in raw compute. It also has 6400 shading units versus 1024, 50 ray tracing cores versus 8, and 200 tensor cores versus none listed for the Intel part.

The RTX 5070 SUPER is the choice for anyone running 3DMark Steel Nomad or similar DX12 workloads, as its 2690 score is the only measured data point in this comparison. The Arc 140T has no benchmarks, so its practical gaming performance cannot be quantified from the database. Buyers needing a discrete GPU with 18 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth should pick the NVIDIA card. Users prioritizing minimal power consumption, integrated graphics, and system-shared memory should consider the Intel part, but only for light workloads, since no performance numbers exist to validate its capabilities.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS, which is 6.7 times the 4.813 TFLOPS of the Arc 140T.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc 140T uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Arc 140T has a 35 W TDP, while the RTX 5070 SUPER has a 275 W TDP. The NVIDIA card also requires a 1x 16-pin power connector.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 50 ray tracing cores. The Arc 140T has 8.

Q: What is the RTX 5070 SUPER's benchmark score?

A: It scores 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places it at the 18th percentile. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M with an average score of 2664, a 1% difference.

Q: Does the Arc 140T have any measured benchmark results?

A: The database lists no benchmark entries for the Arc 140T, so its performance percentile of 50 is not based on recorded scores.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc 140T Mobile uses the Xe-LPG+ architecture built on TSMC's 5 nm process. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M generation for Arrow Lake-H chips, with the predecessor listed as HD Graphics-M. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It includes 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. No tensor cores are listed for this part, and transistor count and die size are unknown.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB205 chip, also fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. It is part of the GeForce 50 generation and GeForce 50-series family. The GPU has 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 118.3M per mm². It features 6400 shading units, 200 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 50 ray tracing cores, and 200 tensor cores. Both GPUs support the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The architectural gap is substantial. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 6.25 times the shading units, 3.125 times the TMUs, 2.5 times the ROPs, 6.25 times the ray tracing cores, and 200 tensor cores where the Arc 140T has none recorded. The Intel part's Xe-LPG+ architecture is designed for integrated use, with no dedicated memory interface, while the NVIDIA GPU uses Blackwell 2.0 with a full discrete memory subsystem.

Specification Differences

Clock speeds differ markedly. The Arc 140T runs at a 300 MHz base clock and 2350 MHz boost. The RTX 5070 SUPER has a 2325 MHz base and 2512 MHz boost, plus a 1750 MHz memory clock running at 28 Gbps effective.

Memory is the largest specification chasm. The Arc 140T uses system-shared memory, meaning its size, type, and bus width are all "System Shared," with bandwidth described as "System Dependent." The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s.

Compute rates underline the divide. The Arc 140T produces 75.20 GPixel/s pixel fill rate and 150.4 GTexel/s texture rate. The RTX 5070 SUPER produces 201.0 GPixel/s and 502.4 GTexel/s, which are 2.7x and 3.3x higher respectively. FP32 throughput is 4.813 TFLOPS for Intel versus 32.15 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. FP16 performance is 9.626 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Arc 140T, while the RTX 5070 SUPER achieves 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1).

Physical and power specifications separate the two completely. The Arc 140T is an IGP with a 35 W TDP, no power connector, no suggested PSU, and an IGP bus interface. Display outputs are portable-device dependent. The RTX 5070 SUPER is a dual-slot card measuring 245 mm by 115 mm by 40 mm, with a 275 W TDP, 1x 16-pin power connector, PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, and outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1b plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Release dates also differ: the Arc 140T launched on 2025-01-12, while the RTX 5070 SUPER is dated 2025-12-31. Both are marked as Active in production status. Neither has a launch MSRP in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two GPUs, and no wins are recorded for either side. The only measured performance data is the RTX 5070 SUPER's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690. That score places the NVIDIA card at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, meaning 82% of recorded GPUs score higher. Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M with an average score of 2664 (1% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 at 2662 (1.1% lower), the Intel Arc Pro B50 at 2660 (1.1% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 at 2645 (1.7% lower). All four competitors are within 1.7% of the RTX 5070 SUPER, indicating that this particular Steel Nomad result is tightly clustered around the 2645-2690 range.

The Arc 140T has an empty benchmarks array, so its performance cannot be compared directly. The 50th percentile assigned to it is a placeholder from the database, not a measured outcome. With no scores, no wins, and no rival comparisons, the Intel part's real-world performance in this test remains unknown.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 SUPER wins on every recorded specification that affects discrete graphics performance. It has more shading units (6400 versus 1024), more texture units (200 versus 64), more ROPs (80 versus 32), more ray tracing cores (50 versus 8), and 200 tensor cores against none for the Arc 140T. Its memory subsystem is fully specified at 18 GB GDDR7 with 672.0 GB/s, whereas the Arc 140T depends entirely on shared system memory. Compute throughput is 6.7x higher in FP32 and 3.3x higher in texture rate. The NVIDIA card also has faster base and boost clocks, and it is the only one with a measured benchmark score, the 2690 in Steel Nomad DX12.

The Arc 140T wins on power efficiency and integration. Its 35 W TDP is 240 W lower than the RTX 5070 SUPER's 275 W. As an IGP, it requires no power connector, no dual-slot cooler, and no PCIe slot, making it suitable for compact portable devices. Its display outputs are portable-device dependent, which matches its intended use in laptops. The Arc 140T also carries a lower base clock, which reduces idle and low-load power draw, and its FP16 throughput of 9.626 TFLOPS, while lower than the NVIDIA part, is delivered at a fraction of the power budget.

For workloads like 3D rendering, ray tracing, or high-resolution gaming, the recorded data points exclusively to the RTX 5070 SUPER. For battery-powered systems or builds where a discrete GPU cannot fit, the Arc 140T is the only viable option between the two, though its actual performance is unmeasured in the database. The choice rests on whether the use case demands the NVIDIA card's massive compute and memory advantages or the Intel part's minimal power footprint and system integration.