AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The Verdict

The database places the AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO in entirely different performance classes. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU, built for low-power console and handheld use, scores 516 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 1st percentile of all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, with no recorded benchmark score, sits at the 50th percentile, indicating a substantially higher performance tier. The data shows the LX PRO is the clear choice for demanding workloads, while the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU is suited for ultra-low-power embedded scenarios.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and 24 GB of GDDR6 memory. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU delivers 5.530 TFLOPS, 128.0 GB/s, and 16 GB of LPDDR5X. The LX PRO leads in every raw performance metric recorded, with a 225 W TDP compared to the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU's 28 W TDP. Users requiring sustained high-frame-rate rendering or large dataset processing should select the LX PRO. Users prioritizing minimal power draw and compact integration should select the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU.

Architecture Differences

The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU uses the Strix Point chip on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 145.9M per mm². The chip has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 48 render output units, and 16 ray tracing cores. Its boost clock reaches 2700 MHz, with a base clock of 800 MHz. Memory operates at 1000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective speed over a 128-bit bus. The power delivery uses no external connectors, and the display output is a single USB Type-C port.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip on the TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, though transistor count and die size are not recorded. It has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. No ray tracing core count is listed. Its memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed over a 192-bit bus. The LX PRO requires a 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU, and it offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

The architecture gap is significant. The RDNA 3.5 architecture in the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU supports ray tracing with 16 dedicated cores, while the TrueGPU architecture in the LX PRO has no listed ray tracing cores. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The LX PRO supports FP16 at a 2:1 ratio (49.15 TFLOPS) versus FP32, while the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU supports FP16 at a 1:1 ratio (5.530 TFLOPS).

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw FP32 compute power?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU delivers 5.530 TFLOPS. The LX PRO is approximately 4.4 times higher in this metric.

Q: How do memory capacities and bandwidth compare?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU offers 16 GB of LPDDR5X memory with a 128-bit bus and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU has a TDP of 28 W and requires no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, requires a 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU.

Q: Which GPU has a better benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU sits at the 1st percentile. The LX PRO has no recorded individual benchmark score in the database.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the physical dimensions of the Lisuan Tech LX PRO?

A: The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length (9.8 inches), 118 mm in height (4.6 inches), and 48 mm in width (1.9 inches), with a dual-slot form factor.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification. The process node differs: 4 nm for the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU versus 6 nm for the LX PRO. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU uses the Strix Point chip, while the LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU has 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die; the LX PRO has no recorded transistor count or die size.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2700 MHz. The LX PRO has no recorded base or boost clocks. Memory clocks also differ: 1000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective for the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU versus 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for the LX PRO.

Memory configuration differs in size, type, bus width, and bandwidth. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU uses 16 GB of LPDDR5X on a 128-bit bus with 128.0 GB/s. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s.

Compute unit counts differ: 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 48 ROPs for the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU versus 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs for the LX PRO. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU has 16 ray tracing cores; the LX PRO has none listed.

Pixel and texture rates differ: the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU achieves 129.6 GPixel/s and 172.8 GTexel/s, while the LX PRO achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 5.530 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 5.530 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power and physical specifications differ. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU has a 28 W TDP, no power connectors, and one USB Type-C display output. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, a 16-pin power connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, a dual-slot form factor, and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU has no recorded bus interface. The LX PRO has recorded dimensions of 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm; the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU has no recorded dimensions.

Release dates differ: July 8, 2025 for the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU versus March 16, 2026 for the LX PRO. Both are listed as Active in production status.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU has one recorded benchmark: 516 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores.

The nearest rivals for the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU provide context for its performance level. The Intel HD Graphics P4000 scores 534 points, which is 3.4% higher than the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU. The AMD Radeon HD 6870 scores 536 points, 3.7% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 6750M scores 484 points, which is 6.6% lower than the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU. The AMD Radeon HD 6770M scores 569 points, 9.3% higher.

These comparisons show the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU operates in the performance range of older discrete GPUs from the HD 6000 series era. Its 1st percentile ranking confirms it sits near the bottom of the overall GPU performance distribution. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, at the 50th percentile, would be expected to outperform the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU by a wide margin, but the absence of recorded benchmarks prevents a precise delta calculation.

The specification data supports this expectation. The LX PRO's FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is 4.4 times higher than the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU's 5.530 TFLOPS. Memory bandwidth is 3.4 times higher (432.0 GB/s versus 128.0 GB/s). Texture rate is 2.2 times higher (384.0 GTexel/s versus 172.8 GTexel/s). Pixel rate is 1.5 times higher (192.0 GPixel/s versus 129.6 GPixel/s). The LX PRO also has 6 times the shading units (6144 versus 1024) and 4 times the ROPs (96 versus 48).

The power envelope tells a different story. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU uses 28 W, which is 8 times less than the LX PRO's 225 W TDP. For power-constrained applications, the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU offers a functional rendering solution at a fraction of the power draw. The LX PRO, with its 550 W suggested PSU, targets desktop systems with ample power delivery.

The data indicates that performance scaling is not linear with power consumption. The LX PRO delivers 4.4 times the FP32 performance at 8 times the power. Efficiency favors the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU in this comparison, but absolute performance favors the LX PRO. The absence of a benchmark score for the LX PRO means the database cannot confirm real-world scaling beyond the specifications. The 50th percentile ranking for the LX PRO, however, places it in the middle of all recorded GPUs, while the Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU's 1st percentile places it near the very bottom.