AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU and Lisuan Tech LX PRO occupy opposite ends of the mobile-to-desktop spectrum, yet both are recorded as active production parts with a percentile ranking of 50 among all GPUs in the database. The former is a 30 W console-oriented chip built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the latter is a 225 W dual-slot desktop card on TSMC's 6 nm node. Their raw specifications diverge sharply, and the data shows that most performance indicators favor the Lisuan Tech LX PRO by wide margins, though the AMD part counters with efficiency and portability. This analysis walks through the head-to-head numbers, use-case splits, architectural contrasts, and specification differences, all drawn strictly from recorded measurements.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database lists no direct head-to-head benchmark scores for these two GPUs, so the comparison relies on their published compute, memory, and rendering rates. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is roughly three times the AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU's 8.294 TFLOPS. In FP16, the gap persists: the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 16.59 TFLOPS (2:1) for the AMD part. These figures indicate that the Lisuan Tech card processes shader workloads at a substantially higher throughput, a fact that will dominate any compute-heavy scenario.

Pixel and texture throughput follow the same pattern. The LX PRO outputs 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, while the Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU manages 86.40 GPixel/s and 129.6 GTexel/s. The pixel rate advantage of the LX PRO is about 2.2 times, and its texture rate advantage is nearly 3 times. For rasterized scenes with high resolution and dense texture sampling, the Lisuan Tech card holds a clear lead.

Memory bandwidth is another decisive differentiator. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 across a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s. The Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU pairs 16 GB of LPDDR5 with a 64-bit bus, producing only 51.20 GB/s. That is an 8.4 times bandwidth advantage for the LX PRO, which directly impacts data-heavy workloads such as large textures, ray tracing acceleration structures, and high-resolution frame buffers.

The AMD part does show a few wins, though they are narrower. Its boost clock reaches 2700 MHz, whereas the LX PRO lists no boost clock in the database. Base clock for the AMD GPU is 800 MHz; the LX PRO lacks a recorded base clock as well. Clock speeds alone are not comparable without full frequency profiles, but the AMD chip's 4 nm process suggests higher frequency headroom per watt. The Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU also supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO is capped at Vulkan 1.3, a small API version advantage. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, so feature-level API parity exists except for that Vulkan revision.

In terms of memory clock, the AMD part lists 800 MHz with 6.4 Gbps effective, while the LX PRO lists 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The effective data rate of the LX PRO is 2.8 times higher, which aligns with its wider bus and larger bandwidth figure. No benchmark scores are available for either GPU, so the head-to-head is derived entirely from these published rates.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in every throughput category recorded in the database. Its FP32 and FP16 compute are roughly 3 times higher, its pixel rate is 2.2 times higher, its texture rate is nearly 3 times higher, and its memory bandwidth is over 8 times higher. For tasks that saturate the GPU, such as 3D rendering, video encoding acceleration, scientific simulation with FP32, or heavy post-processing filters, the LX PRO is the stronger part. The 24 GB GDDR6 frame buffer also doubles as a large working set for AI inference or large model loading, though no tensor core counts are listed for either GPU.

The AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU wins in efficiency and physical footprint. Its TDP is 30 W versus 225 W for the LX PRO, a 7.5 times reduction in power draw. It requires no power connectors, while the LX PRO needs a single 16-pin connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The AMD part is also shorter in length at 280 mm (11 inches) versus 248 mm (9.8 inches) for the LX PRO, but it is thinner at 21 mm (0.8 inches) versus 48 mm (1.9 inches) and has a lower height at 111 mm (4.4 inches) versus 118 mm (4.6 inches). The AMD GPU uses a single USB Type-C display output, making it suitable for compact devices, while the LX PRO offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for multi-monitor desktop setups.

The AMD part's RDNA 3.0 architecture with 12 ray tracing cores provides some ray tracing capability, whereas the LX PRO lists no RT core count in the database. This means the AMD GPU has a documented hardware path for ray tracing acceleration, though its overall compute is lower. For lightweight or integrated-style workloads, the Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU's 4 nm process and 30 W power envelope make it the only viable choice in power-constrained environments.

The Verdict

Based on the recorded data, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is the performance leader across all major compute and memory metrics. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate place it far ahead of the AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU in raw throughput. Users who prioritize maximum rendering speed, high-resolution textures, or large data transfers should select the LX PRO, provided they can accommodate its 225 W TDP, dual-slot design, and 550 W suggested PSU.

The AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU is the appropriate choice for scenarios where power consumption is the limiting factor. Its 30 W TDP, lack of external power connectors, and compact 21 mm width make it suitable for thin-and-light devices, handhelds, or fanless designs. The 16 GB LPDDR5 memory is smaller but still substantial, and the 12 RT cores offer a documented hardware ray tracing path. The AMD part is not competitive in absolute performance, but its efficiency profile and physical dimensions define a distinct niche.

No benchmark scores exist to validate real-world performance, so these conclusions stem from published specification rates. The percentile of 50 for both parts indicates median positioning relative to all GPUs in the database, but that metric does not differentiate them against each other. The verdict is clear: choose the LX PRO for performance, the Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU for low-power compact systems.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU provides 8.294 TFLOPS, making the LX PRO roughly three times faster.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each GPU offer?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 432.0 GB/s from 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, whereas the AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU has 51.20 GB/s from 16 GB LPDDR5 on a 64-bit bus.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU has a TDP of 30 W and requires no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The AMD part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU lists 12 RT cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no RT core count recorded in the database.

Q: What are the physical size differences?

A: The AMD GPU is 280 mm long, 111 mm high, and 21 mm wide. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is 248 mm long, 118 mm high, and 48 mm wide, with a dual-slot design.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU uses the Phoenix chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It contains 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 142.6M per mm². The architecture includes 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 12 dedicated ray tracing cores. Memory is LPDDR5 with 16 GB capacity and a 64-bit bus. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its display output is a single USB Type-C port.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with a TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Transistor count and die size are unknown, and no transistor density is listed. The architecture features 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no RT core or tensor core counts recorded. Memory is 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs include four DisplayPort 1.4a ports.

The process node difference is significant: 4 nm for AMD versus 6 nm for Lisuan Tech, which likely explains the AMD part's lower power draw. The AMD GPU integrates ray tracing hardware explicitly, while the Lisuan Tech card does not list such cores. The AMD part also uses a smaller memory bus and slower memory type, which constrains its bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech card's TrueGPU architecture appears designed for high throughput, given its large shading unit count and memory bandwidth, but the database does not specify its core organization or cache hierarchy.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across every major specification field. The AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2700 MHz; the Lisuan Tech LX PRO lists no base or boost clocks. Memory clocks differ: AMD lists 800 MHz with 6.4 Gbps effective, while Lisuan Tech lists 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. Memory size is 16 GB for AMD versus 24 GB for Lisuan Tech, with types LPDDR5 and GDDR6 respectively. Bus width is 64 bit versus 192 bit, and bandwidth is 51.20 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

Shading units number 768 for AMD and 6144 for Lisuan Tech. TMUs are 48 versus 192, and ROPs are 32 versus 96. The AMD GPU has 12 RT cores; Lisuan Tech has none listed. Pixel rates are 86.40 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rates are 129.6 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 8.294 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 16.59 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS.

TDP is 30 W for AMD and 225 W for Lisuan Tech. The AMD GPU has no slot width recorded and no power connectors, while Lisuan Tech is dual-slot with one 16-pin connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. Bus interface is not listed for AMD, but Lisuan Tech uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 1x USB Type-C for AMD versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for Lisuan Tech. Dimensions differ: AMD is 280 mm by 111 mm by 21 mm, while Lisuan Tech is 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm. Release dates are 2023-06-12 for AMD and 2026-03-16 for Lisuan Tech. The AMD GPU has a launch MSRP of 699 USD, while Lisuan Tech has no launch MSRP recorded.