AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER occupy different segments, as the recorded data shows two products with no overlapping benchmark results. The Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU, a console-class integrated part from AMD, has zero recorded benchmark scores in the database, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers a single DirectX 12 result. The NVIDIA card scores 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with an average benchmark score of 6270. Its percentile ranking against all GPUs sits at 36, indicating that roughly two-thirds of the database entries perform better. The AMD part holds a percentile of 50, but with no actual performance measurements, that ranking reflects its position among all GPUs based on the database's cataloging, not a tested outcome.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counters show zero for both products. This means no direct comparative tests exist between the AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER in the database. The only performance data available comes from the NVIDIA card's single benchmark run. In that test, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER produces a score of 6269.5 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 workload, which translates to an average score of 6270 across its recorded submissions.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER provide context for interpreting that score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 matches it exactly with an average score of 6270 and a delta percentage of 0. The AMD FirePro W600 trails by 0.8 percent with a score of 6223, while the NVIDIA Quadro K620 sits 0.2 percent behind at 6282. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads by 0.9 percent with a score of 6327. These deltas are small, all within a single percentage point, which indicates that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's performance clusters tightly with those four entries in this particular workload.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU has no benchmark scores, there is no numerical basis for comparing its performance to the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER or to any other GPU. The database shows zero wins for each product in head-to-head matchups, reinforcing that no direct comparisons have been conducted. The analysis must therefore rely on the specification sheets and architectural details rather than measured performance for the AMD part.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU, the win analysis splits by capability rather than by tested scores. The NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in every measurable performance category where numbers exist. Its FP32 compute reaches 43.94 TFLOPS, while the AMD part delivers 5.530 TFLOPS, an eight-fold difference. The pixel rate favors NVIDIA at 235.4 GPixel/s versus 129.6 GPixel/s for AMD, and the texture rate shows 686.6 GTexel/s compared to 172.8 GTexel/s. Memory bandwidth heavily favors the NVIDIA card at 896.0 GB/s, more than three times the AMD's 256.0 GB/s.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also wins on raw throughput components. It carries 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, 70 ray tracing cores, and 280 tensor cores. The AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and 16 ray tracing cores, with no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA card's boost clock reaches 2452 MHz, while the AMD part boosts to 2700 MHz, a rare metric where the AMD chip has the higher figure. The AMD processor also wins on power efficiency, with a 28 W TDP against the NVIDIA's 350 W, and on process node, using a 4 nm fabrication versus the NVIDIA's 5 nm.

The AMD part wins in the integrated form factor category. It uses no power connectors, requires no external power supply recommendation, and outputs through a single USB Type-C port. The NVIDIA card needs a 16-pin connector, spans dual slots, and measures 304 mm in length. The AMD chip is designed for compact, low-power systems, while the NVIDIA card targets desktop expansion slots with PCIe 5.0 x16 connectivity.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations. AMD uses RDNA 3.5, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while NVIDIA employs Blackwell 2.0 on a 5 nm process, also from TSMC. The transistor counts differ substantially: the AMD chip, codenamed Strix Point, packs 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, yielding a density of 145.9 million transistors per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip, GB203, has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, producing a lower density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The smaller AMD die with higher density reflects its integrated nature, while the larger NVIDIA die accommodates more compute resources.

Ray tracing hardware differs in scale. The AMD part includes 16 RT cores, while the NVIDIA card has 70. Tensor core availability is exclusive to the NVIDIA side, with 280 tensor cores present; the AMD part lists none. The memory subsystems use different technologies entirely. AMD pairs its chip with 16 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus, achieving 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. NVIDIA also has 16 GB, but uses GDDR7 on the same 256-bit bus width, reaching 896.0 GB/s. The memory clock rates reflect this gap: AMD runs at 1000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective speed, while NVIDIA runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective.

Compute precision handling shows both parts support FP16 at a 1:1 ratio to FP32, meaning they do not double-rate half-precision work. The FP32 outputs, 5.530 TFLOPS for AMD and 43.94 TFLOPS for NVIDIA, scale with the shading unit counts. API support is identical on paper: both list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display output configurations differ, with AMD offering a single USB Type-C and NVIDIA providing one HDMI 2.1b port plus three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Specification Differences

The specification sheet shows several fields where the two products diverge. Clock speeds differ in both base and boost values. AMD runs a base clock of 800 MHz and boosts to 2700 MHz, while NVIDIA starts at 2295 MHz and boosts to 2452 MHz. The NVIDIA card has a higher base clock but a lower boost clock, while the AMD chip has a wider clock range. Power consumption shows the largest relative difference: the AMD TDP is 28 W, and the NVIDIA TDP is 350 W, a twelve-fold gap. The NVIDIA card requires a 16-pin power connector and occupies dual slots, while the AMD part needs no external connectors and has no slot width listed.

Physical dimensions are only recorded for the NVIDIA card, measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The AMD part has no dimension data in the database. Bus interface also differs: NVIDIA uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while AMD has no bus interface listed, consistent with its integrated design. The manufacturing node differs by one nanometer, with AMD at 4 nm and NVIDIA at 5 nm. Transistor density per square millimeter is higher for AMD at 145.9 million, compared to NVIDIA's 120.6 million. The release dates show AMD arriving on October 15, 2025, and NVIDIA on December 31, 2025. The launch MSRP for the NVIDIA card is 749 USD; the AMD part has no MSRP recorded.

Memory type and bandwidth specifications differ as noted, with LPDDR5X versus GDDR7. The texture mapping units and ROPs are higher on the NVIDIA side, 280 versus 64 and 96 versus 48 respectively. The NVIDIA card also lists tensor cores at 280, a category where AMD has no entry. Display outputs differ, with the AMD part using a single USB Type-C and the NVIDIA card providing multiple ports. The production status for both is Active.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS, while the AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU provides 5.530 TFLOPS, making the NVIDIA card approximately eight times faster in this metric.

Q: How do the memory bandwidth figures compare?

A: The NVIDIA card reaches 896.0 GB/s using 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, whereas the AMD part achieves 256.0 GB/s with 16 GB of LPDDR5X on the same bus width. The NVIDIA bandwidth is 3.5 times higher.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU has a TDP of 28 W, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W. The NVIDIA part consumes twelve times the power of the AMD chip.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Yes, both list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 as their supported APIs, despite the different architectures.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU boosts to 2700 MHz, which is higher than the NVIDIA card's boost clock of 2452 MHz, even though the NVIDIA base clock is higher at 2295 MHz.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU?

A: No, the database contains zero benchmark scores for the AMD part. The only recorded benchmark result is for the NVIDIA card, which scores 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.