AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB vs Intel UHD Graphics 710 Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB and Intel UHD Graphics 710 occupy opposite ends of the graphics spectrum, and the benchmark data reflects a decisive performance gap. The Radeon RX 9060 XT delivers an average benchmark score of 4093, while the Intel UHD Graphics 710 trails with an average of 3792. The RX 9060 XT sits at the 24th percentile among all GPUs, whereas the UHD 710 lands at the 22nd percentile, indicating that both are positioned in the lower half of the performance distribution, but the AMD part is measurably ahead.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion: the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is the superior performer in nearly every measurable category. Its average benchmark score of 4093 surpasses the Intel UHD Graphics 710’s 3792 by roughly 8 percent. The RX 9060 XT also holds a higher percentile ranking at 24 versus 22, meaning it outperforms a slightly larger share of the GPU population. For users seeking any level of discrete graphics capability, the RX 9060 XT is the only rational choice based on the available metrics.

The Intel UHD Graphics 710, by contrast, is an integrated processor graphics solution with a 15 W TDP, designed for basic display output rather than demanding workloads. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650, which scores 3823, and the NVIDIA GeForce MX110 at 3834, placing it in a cluster of low-end parts. The RX 9060 XT’s rivals are similarly low-scoring, such as the Intel HD Graphics 630 at 4075 and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M at 4033, yet the AMD part still edges them out. Strictly from the data, the RX 9060 XT is for anyone who needs a functional discrete GPU, while the UHD 710 is suitable only for systems where integrated graphics are the sole option and performance is secondary.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures and manufacturing processes. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT uses the RDNA 4.0 architecture on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a chip codenamed Navi 44. It belongs to the Radeon RX 9000 series and the Navi IV generation. The Intel UHD Graphics 710, conversely, relies on the Generation 12.2 architecture on Intel’s 10 nm process, using an Alder Lake chip. This architectural divide explains the massive difference in transistor count: the RX 9060 XT integrates 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 149.2 million per square millimeter. The UHD 710 has no listed transistor count or die size, but its integrated nature and 10 nm process suggest a much smaller footprint.

Core configuration further separates the two. The RX 9060 XT packs 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, along with 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. The UHD 710 has just 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 8 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores at all. Clock speeds also diverge sharply: the RX 9060 XT runs at a base of 1700 MHz, a boost of 3130 MHz, and a game clock of 2530 MHz, while the UHD 710 operates at a base of 300 MHz and a boost of 1300 MHz. Memory architecture differs completely, with the RX 9060 XT using 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus for 322.3 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the UHD 710 relies on system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The RX 9060 XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the UHD 710 only reaches DirectX 12 (12_1), a meaningful feature gap for modern titles.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB scores 4093 on average, compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 710’s 3792, making the AMD part approximately 8 percent faster overall.

Q: Does the Intel UHD Graphics 710 support ray tracing?

A: No. The UHD 710 has no ray tracing cores listed, whereas the RX 9060 XT includes 32 RT cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for each GPU based on benchmark scores?

A: For the RX 9060 XT, the nearest rivals are the Intel HD Graphics 630 at 4075 (0.4 percent behind) and the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M at 4151 (1.4 percent ahead). For the UHD 710, the closest competitors are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 at 3823 and the NVIDIA GeForce MX110 at 3834.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The RX 9060 XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 322.3 GB/s bandwidth. The UHD 710 uses system-shared memory with a system-dependent bus width and bandwidth.

Q: How do the pixel and texture rates compare?

A: The RX 9060 XT achieves a pixel rate of 200.3 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 400.6 GTexel/s. The UHD 710 manages 10.40 GPixel/s and 10.40 GTexel/s, representing a massive deficit in both metrics.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The RX 9060 XT boosts to 3130 MHz, while the UHD 710 tops out at 1300 MHz, a difference of over 140 percent in favor of the AMD part.

Specification Differences

The specification sheet highlights stark contrasts across nearly every field. The RX 9060 XT is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, while the UHD 710 uses a 10 nm process at Intel with no listed transistor or die data. Clock speeds favor the RX 9060 XT overwhelmingly: base 1700 MHz versus 300 MHz, and boost 3130 MHz versus 1300 MHz. The RX 9060 XT also lists a game clock of 2530 MHz, which the UHD 710 lacks entirely.

Memory setups are incompatible in design. The RX 9060 XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 322.3 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the UHD 710 uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. Core counts differ by an order of magnitude: 2048 shading units versus 128, 128 TMUs versus 8, and 64 ROPs versus 8. The RX 9060 XT includes 32 RT cores; the UHD 710 has none. Power consumption likewise diverges, with the RX 9060 XT rated at 150 W TDP and requiring a 450 W power supply, while the UHD 710 draws just 15 W and requires no external power connector. The RX 9060 XT is a dual-slot card with a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the UHD 710 is an integrated GPU using a Ring Bus interface. Display outputs differ as well: the RX 9060 XT offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a, whereas the UHD 710’s outputs are motherboard dependent. The RX 9060 XT also carries a launch MSRP of 299 USD, while the UHD 710 has no listed MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark results are not available in the dataset, so the comparison relies on each GPU’s respective benchmark suite. The RX 9060 XT was tested in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, scoring 4093. The UHD 710 was evaluated in Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan, scoring 3496 and 4088 respectively, for an average of 3792. The RX 9060 XT’s single score of 4093 is higher than both of the UHD 710’s individual results, with a margin of 0.1 percent over the Vulkan score and 17 percent over the OpenCL score.

The nearest rival data reinforces the RX 9060 XT’s standing. Its closest competitor, the Intel HD Graphics 630, scores 4075, a mere 0.4 percent behind. The NVIDIA Quadro K2100M leads it by 1.4 percent at 4151, while the GeForce GT 755M trails by 1.5 percent at 4033. For the UHD 710, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 scores 3823, which is 0.8 percent behind, and the GeForce MX110 scores 3834, 1.1 percent behind. This suggests the UHD 710 is competitive within its low-power integrated segment, but that segment is far below the RX 9060 XT’s performance tier.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB wins in every scenario that demands graphical processing power. Its 25.64 TFLOPS of FP32 performance dwarfs the UHD 710’s 332.8 GFLOPS, making it suitable for gaming, content creation, and any GPU-accelerated workload. The 32 RT cores enable ray-traced effects, and the 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 322.3 GB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for modern textures and resolutions. The RX 9060 XT’s higher pixel rate of 200.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 400.6 GTexel/s ensure smooth rendering even at high settings. For users with a discrete GPU slot, a 450 W power supply, and a need for performance, the RX 9060 XT is the clear pick.

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 wins only in scenarios where power efficiency and integration are paramount. Its 15 W TDP requires no additional power connectors and generates minimal heat, making it ideal for basic office tasks, video playback, and systems where a discrete GPU is not feasible. The UHD 710’s system-shared memory eliminates the need for dedicated VRAM, reducing cost and complexity. Its DirectX 12 (12_1) support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility allow it to run older or less demanding games, but the 10.40 GPixel/s pixel rate and 10.40 GTexel/s texture rate cap its potential. The UHD 710 is also marked as end-of-life, whereas the RX 9060 XT is active in production, suggesting the AMD part has a longer support horizon. In summary, the RX 9060 XT wins on performance, while the UHD 710 wins on integration and power draw, but the data shows no scenario where the UHD 710 matches the RX 9060 XT’s output.