AMD Radeon RX 9060 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon RX 9060 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither product records a win count in direct competition. This absence of paired test data means any comparative analysis must rely on the independently recorded performance metrics for the RX 9060 and the architectural and theoretical specifications of the LX PRO.

The RX 9060 has a full set of empirical benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 16014. This places it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals provide context for this score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti averages 16129, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 9060. The AMD Radeon R9 370X averages 15862, putting it 1% behind the RX 9060. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 averages 15852, also 1% behind. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 averages 15679, which is 2.1% behind the RX 9060. The data shows the RX 9060 sits in a tightly packed performance band, with its nearest rival only 0.7% ahead and its next closest competitors within 1% to 2.1% behind.

In individual tests, the RX 9060 records its highest score in Geekbench OpenCL at 88183. Its Vulkan score is 39476. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 3322. Passmark results show a G3D score of 17631, a GPU compute score of 9919, a G2D score of 1002, a DirectX 9 score of 280, a DirectX 11 score of 182, a DirectX 10 score of 104, and a DirectX 12 score of 44. The LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and an empty nearest rivals list. Its percentile ranking is 50, which reflects its position relative to all GPUs in the database despite the lack of direct test data.

Because the LX PRO has no empirical scores, the comparison shifts to theoretical output rates. The LX PRO lists a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. The RX 9060 lists a pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s. The LX PRO is 0.3% ahead in pixel rate and 14.7% ahead in texture rate. The LX PRO also lists 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance, while the RX 9060 lists 21.43 TFLOPS. That is a 14.7% advantage for the LX PRO in raw FP32 throughput. In FP16, the LX PRO lists 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the RX 9060 lists 21.43 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO has a 129.4% advantage in FP16 throughput.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different design lineages. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 uses the Navi 44 chip based on RDNA 4.0 architecture, with the codename Strix Point and generation Navi IV (RX 9000). It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 149.2M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip based on TrueGPU architecture, generation 7G100. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown. The RX 9060 uses a denser process node.

The RX 9060 has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The LX PRO has 3.4 times the shading units, 1.7 times the TMUs, and 1.5 times the ROPs. The LX PRO does not list ray tracing cores. The RX 9060 lists no tensor cores, and neither does the LX PRO.

Memory configurations differ substantially. The RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO offers three times the memory capacity and 50% more bandwidth. Both list the same memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The LX PRO has a larger memory footprint, which affects workloads that require large data sets.

Clock behavior differs. The RX 9060 lists a base clock of 1700 MHz, a boost clock of 2990 MHz, and a game clock of 2400 MHz. The LX PRO lists no base, boost, or game clocks. The RX 9060 also lists a higher memory clock specification in its memory section, but the LX PRO lists the same 2250 MHz memory clock in its clock section. The RX 9060 has a defined clock structure; the LX PRO does not.

Power requirements differ. The RX 9060 has a TDP of 132 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 300 W power supply. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply. Both are dual-slot cards. The RX 9060 uses PCIe 5.0 x16; the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs differ: the RX 9060 has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a, while the LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The LX PRO has physical dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width; the RX 9060 has no recorded dimensions.

API support is similar but not identical. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 9060 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The RX 9060 was released on 2025-08-04, and the LX PRO was released on 2026-03-16. Both are listed as active in production. The RX 9060 has a predecessor listed as Navi III; the LX PRO has no predecessor. Neither has a successor listed.

The Verdict

The data shows two cards with different strengths. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has empirical benchmark results, a 59th percentile ranking among all GPUs, and an average benchmark score of 16014. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, is only 0.7% faster, which puts the RX 9060 in a competitive performance class. The RX 9060 also has a lower TDP at 132 W versus 225 W, a smaller power supply recommendation at 300 W versus 550 W, and a denser 4 nm process node.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores and no nearest rivals in the database. Its percentile ranking of 50 reflects its position in the overall GPU distribution, but without empirical scores, its actual measured performance cannot be verified from the recorded data. Its theoretical specifications are higher in several areas: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 21.43 TFLOPS, 24 GB memory versus 8 GB, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 288.0 GB/s, and 6144 shading units versus 1792. The LX PRO also lists a higher texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s versus 334.9 GTexel/s and a slightly higher pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s versus 191.4 GPixel/s.

The choice depends on what the data supports. The RX 9060 is the only card with measured performance scores in the database. Its average score and percentile ranking are documented. The LX PRO is a higher-specification card on paper, with more memory, more shading units, and higher theoretical throughput, but the database contains no benchmark results to confirm how those specifications translate into actual performance. The RX 9060 also has a lower power draw and a newer PCIe interface. The LX PRO has a later release date and more display outputs.

For users who require large memory capacity, the LX PRO provides 24 GB, which is three times the RX 9060's 8 GB. For users who require higher raw FP32 throughput, the LX PRO lists a 14.7% advantage. For users who require measured performance data, the RX 9060 is the only option with recorded scores. The RX 9060 also has a higher percentile ranking at 59 versus 50, though this is based on a full benchmark suite for the RX 9060 and no benchmark suite for the LX PRO.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0, which reflects the absence of recorded benchmark results.

Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RX 9060's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which averages 16129 and is 0.7% faster. The RX 9060 is 1% ahead of both the AMD Radeon R9 370X and the AMD Radeon RX 7700, and 2.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5500.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the FP32 performance difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RX 9060 lists 21.43 TFLOPS FP32. The LX PRO lists 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is 14.7% higher.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RX 9060 has a TDP of 132 W, uses a 1x 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 300 W power supply. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The LX PRO has 6144 shading units. The RX 9060 has 1792 shading units. The LX PRO has 3.4 times as many shading units as the RX 9060.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 wins in areas supported by measured data. It has an average benchmark score of 16014 and a 59th percentile ranking, while the LX PRO has no recorded scores and a 50th percentile ranking. The RX 9060 is also ahead in power efficiency, with a 132 W TDP versus 225 W, and a 300 W suggested power supply versus 550 W. It uses a 4 nm process node, compared to the LX PRO's 6 nm node. The RX 9060 supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The RX 9060 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The RX 9060 also has a defined clock structure with a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2990 MHz, while the LX PRO has no recorded clocks. The RX 9060 has a higher percentile ranking at 59 versus 50.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in theoretical specification comparisons. It has 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is 14.7% higher than the RX 9060's 21.43 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, compared to the RX 9060's 21.43 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, a 129.4% advantage. It has 24 GB of memory versus 8 GB, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 288.0 GB/s. It has 6144 shading units versus 1792, 192 TMUs versus 112, and 96 ROPs versus 64. Its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 334.9 GTexel/s, a 14.7% advantage, and its pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 191.4 GPixel/s, a 0.3% advantage. The LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the RX 9060 has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a. The LX PRO has recorded physical dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width, while the RX 9060 has no recorded dimensions. The LX PRO also has a later release date of 2026-03-16, compared to the RX 9060's 2025-08-04.

The data indicates a clear split. The RX 9060 is the card with verified benchmark results, lower power draw, and a more recent PCIe standard. The LX PRO is the card with higher theoretical throughput, larger memory capacity, and more shading units, but no empirical scores in the database to confirm real-world performance.