GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 9060

CORE STATE Navi 44
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2990 MHz
TDP 132 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 4.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T1000

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1395 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
3,322
N/A
geekbench_opencl
88,725
37,704
geekbench_vulkan
39,586
34,874

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 9060 vs NVIDIA T1000

Reviewing the test numbers for NVIDIA T1000 by NVIDIA and AMD's RX 9060 graphics, a trend of close throughput emerges. Not one card wins steadily across the benchmarks. The alternating of wins suggests core balance. Users confront a real choice in this matchup. Both GPUs achieve solid visual results.

In-game results also show similar performance between NVIDIA T1000 by NVIDIA and AMD's RX 9060 graphics. FPS differences generally land within 5-10%. Such small differences are rarely visible during practical gameplay. Either cards offer capable performance. Players should decide assuredly between these two.

Over dwelling on slight FPS advantages, potential buyers should consider other elements. Power efficiency, noise levels, materials, and warranty options often play a role greater than small FPS variations. The variables can tip the decision. Consider further than only performance. The complete picture is important.

When people undecided between NVIDIA T1000 by NVIDIA and AMD's RX 9060 graphics, be certain that both option delivers matching graphics throughput. The benchmark figures confirms not a clear victor. Reach your choice on additional considerations and appreciate strong rendering performance either way. The two are winners in this own sense. Select comfortably.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 9060
T1000
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,792
896 -50.0%
Shaders
1,792
896 -50.0%
TMUs
112
56 -50.0%
ROPs
64
32 -50.0%
Compute Units
28
SM Count
14
Clocks
Base Clock
1700 MHz
1065 MHz
Boost Clock
2990 MHz
1395 MHz
Game Clock
2400 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz 20.1 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
4,096 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
322.3 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
1024 KB
L3 Cache
32 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
191.4 GPixel/s
44.64 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
334.9 GTexel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
21.43 TFLOPS
2.500 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
669.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
78.12 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
42.86 TFLOPS (2:1)
5.000 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
28
Matrix Cores
56
Power
TDP
132 W
50 W
TDP (W)
132
50 -62.1%
Suggested PSU
300 W
250 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
Turing
GPU Name
Navi 44
TU117
Codename
Strix Point
Generation
Navi IV (RX 9000)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
4 nm
12 nm
Transistors
29,700 million
4,700 million
Die Size
199 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
149.2M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
156 mm 6.1 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b2x DisplayPort 2.1a
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi III
Quadro Volta
Successor
Workstation Ampere
View Radeon RX 9060 Details View T1000 Details