GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 9060

CORE STATE Navi 44
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2990 MHz
TDP 132 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 4.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A2000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1687 MHz
TDP 95 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
3,322
N/A
geekbench_opencl
88,725
56,518
geekbench_vulkan
39,586
53,146
passmark_directx_10
N/A
57
passmark_directx_11
N/A
68
passmark_directx_12
N/A
47
passmark_directx_9
N/A
115
passmark_g2d
N/A
491
passmark_g3d
N/A
9,611
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
4,334

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 9060 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

Radeon NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and GeForce RX 9060 offer almost identical benchmark results in the side-by-side comparison. The performance variations between both GPUs typically sit inside single digits, leaving either a solid pick. The equality makes the selection multifaceted. Other elements become especially significant. Availability usually affects the balance.

When frame rates is so matched, cost and functionality turn the main considerations. Evaluate RT performance quality, upscaling support, thermal requirements, and ecosystem maturity when choosing between Radeon NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and GeForce RX 9060. These elements might affect the balance. Think comprehensively. This complete picture counts.

When people torn between Radeon NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and GeForce RX 9060, feel confident that either option offers similar visual capability. The score figures demonstrates nil definite winner. Base your choice on other considerations and appreciate capable visual performance no matter what. The two are winners in this respective regard. Go with safely.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 9060
RTX A2000 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,792
2,560 +42.9%
Shaders
1,792
2,560 +42.9%
TMUs
112
80 -28.6%
ROPs
64
48 -25.0%
Compute Units
28
SM Count
20
Clocks
Base Clock
1700 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
2990 MHz
1687 MHz
Game Clock
2400 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz 20.1 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
4,096 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
322.3 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
2 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
191.4 GPixel/s
80.98 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
334.9 GTexel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
21.43 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
669.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
135.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
42.86 TFLOPS (2:1)
8.637 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
28
20 -28.6%
Tensor Cores
80
Matrix Cores
56
Power
TDP
132 W
95 W
TDP (W)
132
95 -28.0%
Suggested PSU
300 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Navi 44
GA107
Codename
Strix Point
Generation
Navi IV (RX 9000)
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
4 nm
8 nm
Transistors
29,700 million
8,700 million
Die Size
199 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
149.2M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b2x DisplayPort 2.1a
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi III
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
Ada-MW
View Radeon RX 9060 Details View RTX A2000 Mobile Details