GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 9060

CORE STATE Navi 44
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2990 MHz
TDP 132 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 4.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

CMP 50HX

CORE STATE TU102
VRAM 10 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1545 MHz
TDP 250 W
BUS WIDTH 320 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
3,322
N/A
geekbench_opencl
88,725
56,135
geekbench_vulkan
39,586
47,445

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 9060 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

GeForce NVIDIA CMP 50HX and the AMD RX 9060 achieve almost identical rendering results in the head-to-head comparison. The performance gaps between the cards usually land inside single digits, making both a valid option. This equivalence renders the choice nuanced. Secondary elements turn more important. Price usually influences the choice.

If frame rates is extremely comparable, cost and features grow the primary factors. Look at hardware RT quality, reconstruction features, energy efficiency, and software stability when choosing between GeForce NVIDIA CMP 50HX and the AMD RX 9060. Such variables can influence the scales. Weigh broadly. The broader picture plays a role.

From a specification perspective, GeForce NVIDIA CMP 50HX and the AMD RX 9060 feature matching capabilities. VRAM size, shader count, and bandwidth speed are virtually aligned. The hardware balance explains the comparable test data. Neither maintains a significant specification edge. The comparison is fair.

Overall, this analysis between GeForce NVIDIA CMP 50HX and the AMD RX 9060 results in a near tie. Frame rate variations are minor and improbable to affect everyday experience. Concentrate your determination on availability, driver considerations, and specific extra priorities. The two are capable options. This draw is genuine.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 9060
CMP 50HX
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,792
3,584 +100.0%
Shaders
1,792
3,584 +100.0%
TMUs
112
192 +71.4%
ROPs
64
80 +25.0%
Compute Units
28
SM Count
56
Clocks
Base Clock
1700 MHz
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
2990 MHz
1545 MHz
Game Clock
2400 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz 20.1 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
10 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
10,240 +25.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
320 bit
Bandwidth
322.3 GB/s
560.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
5 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
191.4 GPixel/s
123.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
334.9 GTexel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
21.43 TFLOPS
11.07 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
669.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
346.1 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
42.86 TFLOPS (2:1)
22.15 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
28
56 +100.0%
Tensor Cores
448
Matrix Cores
56
Power
TDP
132 W
250 W
TDP (W)
132
250 +89.4%
Suggested PSU
300 W
600 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
Turing
GPU Name
Navi 44
TU102
Codename
Strix Point
Generation
Navi IV (RX 9000)
Mining GPUs
Process Size
4 nm
12 nm
Transistors
29,700 million
18,600 million
Die Size
199 mm²
754 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
149.2M / mm²
24.7M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
116 mm 4.6 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b2x DisplayPort 2.1a
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x4
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi III
View Radeon RX 9060 Details View CMP 50HX Details