AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

CORE STATE Navi 31
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2245 MHz
TDP 260 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile

CORE STATE Wildcat Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2300 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Xe3-LPG
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
4,814
N/A
geekbench_opencl
175,758
N/A
geekbench_vulkan
99,850
N/A
passmark_directx_10
139
N/A
passmark_directx_11
300
N/A
passmark_directx_12
107
N/A
passmark_directx_9
310
N/A
passmark_g2d
1,180
N/A
passmark_g3d
27,089
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
15,016
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE and the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile occupy entirely different segments of the graphics hardware spectrum. The RX 7900 GRE is a high-end discrete desktop solution built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the Intel part is a low-power integrated graphics processor designed for mobile devices. The recorded data shows a massive performance gulf between the two, driven by differences in chip design, memory configuration, and thermal envelope.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE sits at the 77th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is recorded at the 50th percentile, indicating a median position.

Q: How much VRAM does the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE have?

A: The RX 7900 GRE uses 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. This is a fixed, dedicated memory pool.

Q: What type of memory does the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile use?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses System Shared memory. Its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as System Shared or System Dependent, meaning it draws from the host system's main memory.

Q: What is the transistor count on the AMD chip?

A: The Navi 31 chip inside the RX 7900 GRE contains 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. This density works out to 109.1M transistors per square millimeter.

Q: What is the power draw of each GPU?

A: The RX 7900 GRE has a TDP of 260 W and requires a 600 W suggested power supply. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W and uses no external power connectors.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE and the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7900 GRE uses the Navi 31 chip under the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Plum Bonito. It belongs to the Navi III generation and is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses the Wildcat Lake chip under the Xe3-LPG architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M generation. Intel fabricates this chip on a 3 nm process at its own foundry. The manufacturing process difference is notable: the AMD part uses 5 nm, while the Intel part uses 3 nm.

The RX 7900 GRE is a discrete card with a dual-slot design, a 276 mm length, a 110 mm height, and a 51 mm width. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and requires two 8-pin power connectors. The Intel part is an IGP, meaning integrated graphics processor, with no slot width, no dimensions, no power connectors, and an IGP bus interface. It is designed for portable devices.

Compute resources differ by orders of magnitude. The RX 7900 GRE has 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, 160 ROPs, and 80 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and 1 ray tracing core. Neither GPU lists tensor cores in the database.

The AMD card runs at a base clock of 1287 MHz, a game clock of 1880 MHz, and a boost clock of 2245 MHz. Its memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2300 MHz; it has no game clock listed and its memory clock is marked System Shared.

Pixel and texture rates reinforce the gap. The RX 7900 GRE delivers 359.2 GPixel/s and 718.4 GTexel/s. The Intel part delivers 9.200 GPixel/s and 18.40 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance shows the RX 7900 GRE at 45.98 TFLOPS for FP32 and 91.96 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1). The Intel part reaches 588.8 GFLOPS for FP32 and 1,177.6 GFLOPS for FP16 (2:1).

The RX 7900 GRE has a release date of 2023-07-26, a predecessor in the Navi II series, and a successor in Navi IV. The Intel part has a release date of 2026-04-15 and lists HD Graphics-M as its predecessor. Both are currently marked as Active in production status.

The Verdict

The data positions these two GPUs for completely different use cases. The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a discrete desktop graphics card with a 260 W TDP, 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, and a 57,700 million transistor chip. It is built for high-end gaming and compute workloads where raw throughput matters. Its 77th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 32456 place it well above the median.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is a 25 W integrated solution with 128 shading units and system-shared memory. It has no dedicated VRAM, no discrete dimensions, and no power connectors. Its 50th percentile ranking reflects a middle-of-the-pack position, but that ranking comes with an average benchmark score of 0 in the database due to the absence of recorded benchmark entries.

For a user building a desktop system with a dedicated power supply and expecting high frame rates or heavy compute, the RX 7900 GRE is the only viable option based on the recorded specifications. For a thin-and-light portable device where power efficiency and integration matter, the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile fits the IGP form factor. The two do not compete in the same market segment. The RX 7900 GRE has a launch MSRP of 549 USD. The Intel part has no launch MSRP listed.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

The RX 7900 GRE uses the Navi 31 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture and the Plum Bonito codename. The Intel part uses the Wildcat Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture and no codename recorded. The AMD chip is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel chip uses a 3 nm process at Intel. Transistor count is 57,700 million for AMD and unknown for Intel. Die size is 529 mm² for AMD and unknown for Intel. Transistor density is 109.1M / mm² for AMD and null for Intel.

Clocks differ: AMD runs at 1287 MHz base, 1880 MHz game, and 2245 MHz boost. Intel runs at 300 MHz base and 2300 MHz boost. AMD memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective; Intel memory clock is System Shared. AMD memory is 16 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. Intel memory is System Shared across size, type, bus width, and bandwidth.

Compute units differ sharply: AMD has 5120 shading units, 320 TMUs, 160 ROPs, and 80 RT cores. Intel has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and 1 RT core. Pixel rate is 359.2 GPixel/s for AMD versus 9.200 GPixel/s for Intel. Texture rate is 718.4 GTexel/s versus 18.40 GTexel/s. FP32 is 45.98 TFLOPS versus 588.8 GFLOPS. FP16 is 91.96 TFLOPS versus 1,177.6 GFLOPS.

Power and physical specs diverge completely. AMD TDP is 260 W; Intel TDP is 25 W. AMD uses a dual-slot cooler with 2x 8-pin power connectors and a 600 W suggested PSU. Intel is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. AMD uses PCIe 4.0 x16; Intel uses an IGP bus interface. AMD display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C. Intel display outputs are listed as Portable Device Dependent.

APIs are identical: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Release dates differ, with AMD at 2023-07-26 and Intel at 2026-04-15. The AMD card lists Navi II as predecessor and Navi IV as successor. The Intel part lists HD Graphics-M as predecessor and no successor. The AMD card has dimensions of 276 mm length, 110 mm height, and 51 mm width. The Intel part has no dimensions recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two GPUs. The wins counter shows 0 for both sides. However, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE has a full set of recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has an empty benchmark array.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RX 7900 GRE scores 4814 points. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 175758 points. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 99850 points. Passmark results for the RX 7900 GRE are as follows: DirectX 10 scores 139, DirectX 11 scores 300, DirectX 12 scores 107, DirectX 9 scores 310, G2D scores 1180, G3D scores 27089, and GPU Compute scores 15016.

The average benchmark score for the RX 7900 GRE is 32456. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD FirePro S10000 with an average score of 32388 and a delta of 0.2 percent, the AMD FirePro S9300 X2 with an average score of 32540 and a delta of negative 0.3 percent, the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME with an average score of 32601 and a delta of negative 0.4 percent, and the AMD Radeon Pro 570X with an average score of 32176 and a delta of 0.9 percent. These deltas are all within one percent, indicating that the RX 7900 GRE sits in a tightly packed performance cluster among these rival cards.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no benchmark scores, no average score, and no nearest rivals in the database. Its percentile of 50 is a positional value, but without measured results, direct numerical comparison is impossible. The recorded data confirms that the RX 7900 GRE delivers 45.98 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and a 359.2 GPixel/s pixel rate. The Intel part delivers 588.8 GFLOPS of FP32 compute, system-dependent bandwidth, and a 9.200 GPixel/s pixel rate.

The RX 7900 GRE is ahead of the Intel part in every recorded compute metric: roughly 78 times the FP32 throughput, roughly 39 times the pixel rate, roughly 39 times the texture rate, 40 times the shading units, 40 times the TMUs, and 40 times the ROPs. The Intel part has a higher boost clock at 2300 MHz versus 2245 MHz, but that advantage does not compensate for the far smaller execution resource pool. The RX 7900 GRE also carries 80 ray tracing cores versus 1 on the Intel part.

Memory bandwidth is a decisive separator. The RX 7900 GRE sustains 576.0 GB/s from dedicated GDDR6, while the Intel part relies on system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. A discrete GPU with dedicated memory and a 256-bit bus will not behave like an IGP borrowing host memory, regardless of clock speeds. The RX 7900 GRE also consumes 260 W versus 25 W, a 10.4 times difference in power draw, which explains the performance differential.

In terms of production status, both are Active. The RX 7900 GRE launched on 2023-07-26 with a launch MSRP of 549 USD. The Intel part launches on 2026-04-15 with no MSRP recorded. The RX 7900 GRE has a successor in Navi IV, while the Intel part has no successor listed. The recorded data shows a clear hierarchy: the RX 7900 GRE is a high-throughput discrete card, and the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is a low-power integrated unit. Every measured specification, from shading units to memory bandwidth to FP32 throughput, places the AMD card in a different performance class.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 7900 GRE
Graphics 1 Xe Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
5,120
128 -97.5%
Shaders
5,120
128 -97.5%
TMUs
320
8 -97.5%
ROPs
160
4 -97.5%
Compute Units
80
—
Execution Units
—
2
Clocks
Base Clock
1287 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
2245 MHz
2300 MHz
Game Clock
1880 MHz
—
Shader Clock
1880 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
System Shared
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
System Shared
VRAM (MB)
16,384
—
Memory Type
GDDR6
System Shared
Memory Bus
256 bit
System Shared
Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
System Dependent
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
64 KB (per EU)
L2 Cache
6 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
64 MB
—
L0 Cache
64 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
359.2 GPixel/s
9.200 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
718.4 GTexel/s
18.40 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
45.98 TFLOPS
588.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,436.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
73.60 GFLOPS (1:8)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
91.96 TFLOPS (2:1)
1,177.6 GFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
80
1 -98.8%
XMX Cores
—
32
Matrix Cores
160
—
Power
TDP
260 W
25 W
TDP (W)
260
25 -90.4%
Suggested PSU
600 W
—
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Xe3-LPG
GPU Name
Navi 31
Wildcat Lake
Codename
Plum Bonito
—
Generation
Navi III (RX 7000)
Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake)
Process Size
5 nm
3 nm
Transistors
57,700 million
unknown
Die Size
529 mm²
unknown
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Density
109.1M / mm²
—
AMD MCM
GCD Transistors
45,400 million
—
GCD Die Size
304.35 mm²
—
MCD Transistors
2,050 million x6
—
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Length
276 mm 10.9 inches
—
Height
110 mm 4.3 inches
—
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a2x DisplayPort 2.11x USB Type-C
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
IGP
Other
Launch Price
549 USD
—
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Navi II
HD Graphics-M
Successor
Navi IV
—
View Radeon RX 7900 GRE Details View Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile Details