AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no shared benchmark results for these two cards. The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT has ten recorded scores across 3DMark, Geekbench, and Passmark suites, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark entries at all. This lack of direct comparison data means the analysis must rely on architectural specifications and the RX 7800 XT's performance relative to its nearest rivals.

The RX 7800 XT's average benchmark score sits at 11627, placing it in the 51st percentile of all GPUs tracked. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 with an average score of 11680, putting the RX 7800 XT just 0.5% behind. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500M scores 11528, which the RX 7800 XT beats by 0.9%. Against the NVIDIA Tesla K20c at 11479, the RX 7800 XT leads by 1.3%, and it trails the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT (11842) by 1.8%. These deltas are small, indicating the RX 7800 XT performs in a tightly clustered band around the 11600 mark.

Looking at individual workloads, the RX 7800 XT shows clear strengths. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it records 4157 points. Geekbench Vulkan returns 54228, while OpenCL produces 18290. Passmark G3D shows 24176, and GPU Compute reaches 13473. The DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 Passmark scores are 304, 121, 249, and 93 respectively, with G2D at 1177. These figures paint a picture of a card that excels in modern API workloads, particularly Vulkan and DX12, while older API performance is comparatively modest.

Since the LX PRO has zero recorded benchmarks, any head-to-head numeric comparison is impossible. The data cannot show which card wins any specific test. What the database does reveal is the RX 7800 XT's position among existing hardware, and the LX PRO's position as a completely untested entry at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7800 XT uses the Navi 32 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. It packs 28,100 million transistors onto a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The chip carries the codename Wheat Nas and belongs to the Navi III generation of the RX 7000 series.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO takes a different path. Its chip is designated 7G105, running TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation. TSMC also fabricates this chip, but on a 6 nm process. Transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, with no density figure available. No codename is recorded, and there is no predecessor or successor in the database.

The manufacturing process difference is notable: 5 nm versus 6 nm. The smaller node typically allows higher clock speeds or lower power for the same performance, though the LX PRO has no base, boost, or game clock values recorded. Only its memory clock is listed at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. The RX 7800 XT runs a base clock of 1295 MHz, a boost of 2430 MHz, a game clock of 2124 MHz, and memory at 2438 MHz with 19.5 Gbps effective.

Memory architectures diverge substantially. The RX 7800 XT offers 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 624.1 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO doubles capacity to 24 GB of GDDR6 but narrows the bus to 192-bit, producing 432.0 GB/s. The wider bus on the RX 7800 XT gives it a 44.5% bandwidth advantage despite lower capacity.

Compute resources differ in configuration. The RX 7800 XT has 3840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, with 60 dedicated ray tracing cores. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing cores listed. The higher shading unit count on the LX PRO does not translate to higher throughput: the RX 7800 XT delivers 37.32 TFLOPS FP32, while the LX PRO manages 24.58 TFLOPS. The RX 7800 XT also produces 583.2 GTexel/s texture rate versus 384.0 GTexel/s, and 233.3 GPixel/s pixel rate versus 192.0 GPixel/s. The LX PRO has an FP16 advantage at 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, compared to the RX 7800 XT's 37.32 TFLOPS at 1:1.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6, while the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT has 16 GB. The RX 7800 XT compensates with a wider 256-bit bus versus 192-bit, giving it 624.1 GB/s bandwidth against the LX PRO's 432.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the LX PRO support ray tracing?

A: No ray tracing cores are listed for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The RX 7800 XT includes 60 dedicated ray tracing cores. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: What process nodes do these cards use?

A: The RX 7800 XT uses a 5 nm process from TSMC, while the LX PRO uses a 6 nm process from the same foundry. The RX 7800 XT has 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die; the LX PRO's transistor count and die size are unknown.

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute?

A: The RX 7800 XT delivers 37.32 TFLOPS FP32, compared to 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX PRO. The LX PRO leads in FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 37.32 TFLOPS on the RX 7800 XT.

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The RX 7800 XT is rated at 263 W TDP with a suggested 600 W PSU, using two 8-pin connectors. The LX PRO draws 225 W TDP with a suggested 550 W PSU, using a single 16-pin connector.

Q: How do their display outputs compare?

A: The RX 7800 XT offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a with no HDMI output.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 28,100 million | unknown |

| Die size | 346 mm² | unknown |

| Memory size | 16 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 624.1 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Memory clock | 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps) |

| Shading units | 3840 | 6144 |

| Texture mapping units | 240 | 192 |

| Ray tracing cores | 60 | none |

| FP32 performance | 37.32 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 performance | 37.32 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel rate | 233.3 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 583.2 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 263 W | 225 W |

| Power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 600 W | 550 W |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Release date | 2023-09-05 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 499 USD | none recorded |

| Dimensions | 267 mm length, 111 mm height, 50 mm width | 248 mm length, 118 mm height, 48 mm width |

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear performance hierarchy based on specifications. The RX 7800 XT leads in nearly every throughput metric: FP32 compute is 52% higher, texture rate is 52% higher, pixel rate is 21% higher, and memory bandwidth is 44% higher. Its 60 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration that the LX PRO entirely lacks. The RX 7800 XT also has an established benchmark record with a 51st percentile ranking and an average score of 11627, while the LX PRO has zero recorded scores and sits at the 50th percentile by default.

The LX PRO counters with more memory (24 GB versus 16 GB), a higher shading unit count (6144 versus 3840), and superior FP16 throughput (49.15 versus 37.32 TFLOPS). It also draws less power at 225 W versus 263 W and requires a smaller suggested PSU at 550 W versus 600 W. Its 6 nm process is a generation behind the RX 7800 XT's 5 nm node, and its unknown transistor count prevents density analysis.

For users who need maximum raw rasterization performance, the RX 7800 XT is the data-supported choice. Its benchmark scores confirm it operates in a competitive band with cards like the GTX 1660 and RX 6500 XT. The LX PRO has no measured performance to validate its specifications. The 24 GB memory pool is the only clear advantage it holds, which could matter for large datasets or specific compute workloads that exceed 16 GB.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7800 XT wins on raw performance. Its 37.32 TFLOPS FP32, 624.1 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 60 ray tracing cores make it the stronger candidate for modern gaming, particularly with DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4157 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 54228 demonstrate real-world capability in current API environments. Its 233.3 GPixel/s and 583.2 GTexel/s rates outpace the LX PRO by 21% and 52% respectively, which translates to better fill rates in resolution-heavy scenarios.

The LX PRO wins on memory capacity and efficiency. Its 24 GB frame buffer is 50% larger than the RX 7800 XT's 16 GB, which suits workloads with massive textures or large compute buffers. The 2:1 FP16 ratio means FP16 workloads run at 49.15 TFLOPS, exceeding the RX 7800 XT's 37.32 TFLOPS in that precision. Lower power draw at 225 W and a smaller physical footprint (248 mm length versus 267 mm) make it easier to fit and feed. The four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups without HDMI, which may suit display walls or specific workstation configurations.

The GPU compute segment favors the RX 7800 XT based on its Passmark GPU Compute score of 13473, though the LX PRO's larger memory could shift this balance in memory-bound tasks. The RX 7800 XT's 8-pin power connectors are more universally compatible with existing power supplies, while the LX PRO's 16-pin connector requires newer PSU standards or adapters. Neither card has benchmark data for the other in any shared test, so the verdict rests on architectural merits and the RX 7800 XT's measured track record.