AMD Radeon RX 7700S vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data presents two very different interpretations of GPU performance. The AMD Radeon RX 7700S is a mobile-focused part with a complete benchmark profile, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a desktop-oriented card with no recorded benchmark scores. The RX 7700S holds an average benchmark score of 33849, placing it in the 78th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon HD 7950 (average score 33951, 0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 480 (average score 33997, 0.4% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB (average score 33694, 0.5% lower), and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 (average score 33622, 0.7% lower). These deltas show the RX 7700S sits in a tight cluster, essentially trading blows with older desktop cards.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile, with no rival data available. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible. The LX PRO does carry significantly higher theoretical specifications, including 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, 6144 shading units, and a 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 rating. However, the database contains no measurements to confirm whether those specifications translate into actual performance. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the RX 7700S is the only part with verified benchmark results, while the LX PRO remains unvalidated. Users requiring immediate, measured performance data should look to the RX 7700S. Users needing raw memory capacity or higher theoretical compute might consider the LX PRO, but they would be relying on unverified specifications.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different design lineages. The AMD Radeon RX 7700S uses the Navi 33 chip built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename "Hotpink Bonefish". It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) generation and uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². Its predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a chip labeled "7G105" under an architecture called "TrueGPU", belonging to the "7G100" generation. It also uses a 6 nm TSMC process node, but transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown. The architecture name suggests a different design philosophy, but the database provides no further structural details.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7700S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3, a minor API version difference. Both use PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interfaces. The RX 7700S includes 32 ray tracing cores, while the LX PRO lists no ray tracing core count, indicating a possible absence of dedicated RT hardware. The RX 7700S is an integrated graphics package (IGP) with no power connectors and a 100 W TDP. The LX PRO is a dual-slot card requiring a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU, with a 225 W TDP. The LX PRO also has defined physical dimensions (248 mm length, 118 mm height, 48 mm width), while the RX 7700S has portable-device-dependent display outputs and no fixed dimensions.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a 192-bit memory bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, compared to the RX 7700S's 128-bit bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both use GDDR6 memory with 18 Gbps effective speed, but the LX PRO's wider bus provides 144 GB/s more bandwidth.

Q: What is the FP32 compute difference?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is rated at 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the RX 7700S is rated at 20.48 TFLOPS. The LX PRO also leads in FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 40.96 TFLOPS for the RX 7700S, both using a 2:1 ratio.

Q: How do the benchmark scores compare?

A: The RX 7700S has a recorded average benchmark score of 33849, with individual tests including 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2185, Geekbench OpenCL at 62983, and Geekbench Vulkan at 36380. The LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores, so no direct comparison is possible.

Q: Which card has more shading units and texture units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operations units. The RX 7700S has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The LX PRO also has higher pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s vs 160.0 GPixel/s) and texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s vs 320.0 GTexel/s).

Q: What are the memory capacity differences?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the RX 7700S offers 8 GB. This is a threefold difference in capacity, which could matter for large datasets or high-resolution textures.

Q: Do both cards support the same API levels?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7700S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The RX 7700S also has 32 ray tracing cores, whereas the LX PRO has no listed RT core count.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every measurable specification field. The RX 7700S uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture. Both use a 6 nm TSMC process, but transistor count (13,300 million vs unknown) and die size (204 mm² vs unknown) only exist for the RX 7700S. Clock speeds differ significantly: the RX 7700S has base, boost, and game clocks of 1500 MHz, 2500 MHz, and 2200 MHz, while the LX PRO has no core clock data recorded. Memory clocks are identical at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Memory configuration differs substantially. The RX 7700S has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO leads in shading units (6144 vs 2048), TMUs (192 vs 128), ROPs (96 vs 64), pixel rate (192.0 vs 160.0 GPixel/s), texture rate (384.0 vs 320.0 GTexel/s), FP32 (24.58 vs 20.48 TFLOPS), and FP16 (49.15 vs 40.96 TFLOPS). The RX 7700S has 32 ray tracing cores; the LX PRO has none listed.

Power and physical specifications diverge completely. The RX 7700S has a 100 W TDP, is an IGP form factor, uses no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, is dual-slot, requires a 1x 16-pin connector and a 550 W suggested PSU, and measures 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm. The RX 7700S has no fixed display outputs, while the LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Release dates also differ: the RX 7700S launched on January 3, 2023, while the LX PRO is dated March 16, 2026. The RX 7700S is in the 78th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 33849; the LX PRO is in the 50th percentile with an average score of 0.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the RX 7700S and the LX PRO. The head-to-head benchmark list is empty, and both win counts remain at zero. This absence of measured data is itself informative. The RX 7700S has three recorded benchmark results: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2185, Geekbench OpenCL at 62983, and Geekbench Vulkan at 36380. These contribute to its average score of 33849. The LX PRO has no benchmark entries, meaning its theoretical specifications cannot be verified against any real-world workload.

The nearest rival data for the RX 7700S provides context. Its average score of 33849 is 0.3% below the AMD Radeon HD 7950 (33951), 0.4% below the AMD Radeon RX 480 (33997), 0.5% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB (33694), and 0.7% above the NVIDIA RTX A5000 (33622). These deltas, all under one percent, indicate the RX 7700S performs within a narrow band of these older desktop cards. The LX PRO has no comparable data, so its position relative to any rival cannot be established.

The theoretical compute numbers suggest the LX PRO should outperform the RX 7700S. The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is 20% higher than the RX 7700S's 20.48 TFLOPS. Its memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is 50% higher than 288.0 GB/s. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is 20% higher, and its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is 20% higher. Yet none of these advantages appear in benchmark results, because none exist. The data cannot confirm whether the LX PRO's higher specifications produce higher real-world performance, and the RX 7700S remains the only card with measured results.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the RX 7700S wins in every category where measurement exists. It has a verified average benchmark score of 33849, a 78th percentile ranking, and three individual benchmark results. It also has a defined transistor count, die size, clock speeds, and ray tracing cores. The LX PRO wins in theoretical specification categories: memory capacity (24 GB vs 8 GB), memory bandwidth (432.0 GB/s vs 288.0 GB/s), shading units (6144 vs 2048), TMUs (192 vs 128), ROPs (96 vs 64), FP32 compute (24.58 vs 20.48 TFLOPS), FP16 compute (49.15 vs 40.96 TFLOPS), pixel rate, texture rate, and physical connectivity with four DisplayPort outputs. It also has a defined physical form factor and power requirement, which could be relevant for desktop integration.

The RX 7700S is the only part with evidence of actual performance. Its closest rivals are all older desktop GPUs, and it sits within 0.7% of each of them. This suggests it delivers consistent, mid-tier desktop-class performance in a mobile package. The LX PRO, with its larger memory pool and higher compute ratings, appears designed for workloads that demand capacity and throughput, such as large model rendering or multi-display setups. However, the database provides no confirmation that the LX PRO achieves its theoretical rates. The data indicates the RX 7700S is the verified choice for measured performance, while the LX PRO offers higher specifications that remain unproven. Users with workloads that stress memory capacity or raw compute might find the LX PRO's specifications attractive, but the lack of benchmark data means those specifications carry no demonstrated backing.