AMD Radeon RX 7700S vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570 Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 and AMD Radeon RX 7700S occupy different strata of the mobile graphics market. The recorded data shows a single head-to-head benchmark, Geekbench OpenCL, where the RX 7700S delivers a decisive victory, scoring 62,983 against the MX570’s 38,299. This 39.2% margin establishes the RX 7700S as the substantially more capable part, but the MX570 holds its own in specific efficiency-oriented contexts. The database places the MX570 at the 81st percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 7700S sits at the 78th percentile, a distinction driven by their average benchmark scores and the distribution of other tested parts.

Where Each One Wins

The primary use-case split is clear: the AMD Radeon RX 7700S is built for demanding workloads, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 is designed for low-power, everyday acceleration. In the only direct benchmark comparison, the RX 7700S wins outright. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 62,983 is 64.4% higher than the MX570’s 38,299. This indicates a massive advantage in compute-heavy tasks such as rendering, video encoding, and general-purpose GPU computation. The RX 7700S also has a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,185, showcasing its capability in modern DirectX 12 gaming titles, a benchmark the MX570 does not have recorded.

Conversely, the MX570’s win condition lies in its power envelope. With a 15 W TDP, it operates at a fraction of the 100 W TDP of the RX 7700S. This makes the MX570 suitable for ultra-thin laptops where battery life and thermal management are paramount. Its Geekbench score, while lower, still places it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms a significant majority of the database entries. The RX 7700S, despite its higher raw performance, falls to the 78th percentile because its average benchmark score of 33,849 is dragged down by the inclusion of its other recorded tests (Vulkan and 3DMark) in the averaging. The MX570 has only one benchmark entry, so its average score equals its OpenCL result. Therefore, the MX570 wins in scenarios prioritizing extreme portability and low power draw, while the RX 7700S wins in every performance-centric scenario.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures and manufacturing processes. The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 uses the Ampere architecture, fabricated on an 8 nm process at Samsung. The chip, designated GA107S, contains 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 43.5 million per square millimeter. In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 7700S is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the Navi 33 chip (codename Hotpink Bonefish) manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. This chip packs 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die, achieving a higher density of 65.2 million per square millimeter.

These architectural choices lead to significant differences in feature sets. The MX570 includes 16 ray tracing cores and 64 tensor cores, reflecting NVIDIA’s focus on hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The RX 7700S includes 32 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores, relying on other compute units for similar tasks. The MX570’s FP32 performance is 4.731 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at the same rate (1:1 ratio), indicating a unified shader approach. The RX 7700S offers 20.48 TFLOPS FP32 and 40.96 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio), showing a doubled FP16 throughput that is typical of RDNA 3.0’s dual-issue design.

Memory subsystems also diverge sharply. The MX570 has 2 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7700S has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s. This 3x bandwidth advantage is critical for high-resolution textures and data-intensive compute workloads. The RX 7700S also uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the MX570 uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern API compatibility. The RX 7700S is an active product, while the MX570 is marked as end-of-life, released in December 2021 versus January 2023 for the RX 7700S.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct comparison available in the database is the Geekbench OpenCL test. The AMD Radeon RX 7700S scores 62,983, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 scores 38,299. The delta is recorded as -39.2%, indicating the MX570 is 39.2% slower than the RX 7700S. This is a substantial margin that reflects the fundamental differences in compute resources. The RX 7700S has 2,048 shading units, identical to the MX570, but it pairs them with 128 texture mapping units (TMUs) and 64 render output units (ROPs), versus 64 TMUs and 32 ROPs on the MX570. This doubling of TMUs and ROPs, combined with a higher boost clock of 2500 MHz versus 1155 MHz, explains the performance gap.

The RX 7700S’s pixel rate is 160.0 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 320.0 GTexel/s, compared to 36.96 GPixel/s and 73.92 GTexel/s for the MX570. These metrics show the RX 7700S is more than four times faster in pixel throughput and texture fill rates. In real-world terms, this translates to the ability to drive higher resolutions and more detailed geometry without bottlenecking. The MX570’s nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (average score 38,349, delta -0.1%) and the RTX 4080 Mobile (38,135, delta 0.4%). This contextualizes the MX570 as performing in the same league as high-end mobile RTX parts in this specific OpenCL test, which is surprising given its low TDP.

For the RX 7700S, its nearest rivals are older, desktop-class GPUs like the AMD Radeon HD 7950 (average score 33,951, delta -0.3%) and the AMD Radeon RX 480 (33,997, delta -0.4%). This indicates that the RX 7700S’s average score of 33,849 is lower than its OpenCL peak due to its other benchmark results. Its Geekbench Vulkan score is 36,380, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,185. The Vulkan score is notably lower than the OpenCL score, suggesting that the RX 7700S’s driver or architecture performs better under OpenCL than Vulkan in this database’s measurements.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700S is significantly faster, scoring 62,983 compared to the NVIDIA GeForce MX570’s 38,299, a 39.2% lead.

Q: Does the MX570 have any performance advantage?

A: No, the MX570 loses the only head-to-head benchmark. However, its 15 W TDP is substantially lower than the RX 7700S’s 100 W, making it a better fit for low-power devices.

Q: How do their memory configurations compare?

A: The RX 7700S has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the MX570 has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the differences in ray tracing and AI hardware?

A: The MX570 has 16 ray tracing cores and 64 tensor cores. The RX 7700S has 32 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores.

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor count?

A: The RX 7700S has 13,300 million transistors, compared to the MX570’s 8,700 million.

Q: What is the release timeline for these products?

A: The MX570 was released in December 2021 and is end-of-life. The RX 7700S was released in January 2023 and is still active.

Specification Differences

The following table highlights the key specifications where the two GPUs differ, based solely on the recorded data.

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | AMD Radeon RX 7700S |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |

| Process Node | 8 nm (Samsung) | 6 nm (TSMC) |

| Transistors | 8,700 million | 13,300 million |

| Die Size | 200 mm² | 204 mm² |

| Base Clock | 832 MHz | 1500 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2500 MHz |

| Game Clock | Not specified | 2200 MHz |

| Memory Size | 2 GB | 8 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 64 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |

| TMUs | 64 | 128 |

| ROPs | 32 | 64 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 32 |

| Tensor Cores | 64 | None |

| FP16 Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | 40.96 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 36.96 GPixel/s | 160.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 320.0 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 15 W | 100 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2021-12-16 | 2023-01-03 |

| Predecessor | Not specified | Polaris Mobile |