AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has a full suite of benchmark results, an average benchmark score of 22549, and a percentile ranking of 67 among all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentile ranking of 50. For any user whose decision rests on measured performance, the RX 7700 XT is the only option with quantifiable results. The LX PRO offers a larger memory pool and a different architectural approach, but without any benchmark data, its actual performance cannot be verified from the database. The data indicates that the RX 7700 XT is an active, shipping product with a launch MSRP of 449 USD, while the LX PRO is listed as active with no launch MSRP and no performance records. The choice, strictly from the data, is clear for anyone needing verified performance: the RX 7700 XT.

Architecture Differences

The two cards diverge fundamentally in their underlying designs. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series, uses the Navi 32 chip, and is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename Wheat Nas. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a chip designated 7G105, an architecture called TrueGPU, and belongs to the 7G100 generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, but its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

The compute resources differ markedly. The RX 7700 XT has 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 raster operation pipelines, and 54 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO counteracts with 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines, but it has no listed ray tracing cores. In raw shader count, the LX PRO has 77.8% more shading units than the RX 7700 XT. However, the clock behavior tells a different story: the RX 7700 XT has a base clock of 1435 MHz, a game clock of 2171 MHz, and a boost clock of 2544 MHz, while the LX PRO has no base, boost, or game clock listed. The RX 7700 XT therefore has defined operating frequencies, while the LX PRO's frequencies are absent from the record.

Memory configurations share some traits. Both cards use GDDR6 memory with a 192 bit bus width and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The capacities differ: the RX 7700 XT has 12 GB, while the LX PRO has 24 GB, exactly double. Both run memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The pixel rate favors the RX 7700 XT at 244.2 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX PRO, a difference of 27.2%. The texture rate also favors AMD: 549.5 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, a 43.1% advantage. Floating-point throughput is split by precision. The RX 7700 XT delivers 35.17 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS for FP32 but 49.15 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 output is 39.8% higher than the RX 7700 XT's, while its FP32 output is 30.1% lower.

Power and physical specifications also differ. The RX 7700 XT has a TDP of 245 W and uses two 8-pin power connectors. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and uses a single 16-pin connector. Both suggest a 550 W power supply and both are dual-slot cards. The RX 7700 XT measures 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width. The LX PRO is shorter at 248 mm, lower at 118 mm, and slightly narrower at 48 mm. Display outputs diverge sharply: the RX 7700 XT offers 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, while the LX PRO offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. API support is nearly identical for DirectX and OpenGL, both at 12 Ultimate (12_2) and 4.6 respectively, but the RX 7700 XT supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The RX 7700 XT was released on 2023-09-05, while the LX PRO carries a release date of 2026-03-16.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two cards. The wins counters for both cards are set to zero. Therefore, a direct comparison of measured results is impossible from the recorded data. What can be analyzed is the RX 7700 XT's standalone benchmark suite and its position relative to its nearest rivals, which are all NVIDIA or older AMD parts.

The RX 7700 XT's average benchmark score of 22549 places it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, has an average score of 22435, a delta of 0.5% in favor of the RX 7700 XT. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile scores 22729, which is 0.8% higher than the RX 7700 XT. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, 1.5% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 scores 22170, which is 1.7% lower than the RX 7700 XT. These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating that the RX 7700 XT's average performance is closely grouped with these four cards, slightly ahead of two and slightly behind two.

Individual benchmark results for the RX 7700 XT cover several test suites. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3316. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 138383, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 46443. Passmark results include a G3D score of 22547, a G2D score of 1161, a GPU compute score of 12912, and legacy DirectX tests with scores of 119 for DX10, 232 for DX11, 79 for DX12, and 294 for DX9. The average benchmark score of 22549 is nearly identical to the Passmark G3D score of 22547, indicating that the G3D result dominates the average. For the LX PRO, there are no benchmark entries at all, so no wins can be assigned. The data confirms that any discussion of measured performance must center on the RX 7700 XT.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has an average benchmark score of 22549. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: How does the RX 7700 XT compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7700 XT is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile and 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700. It is 0.8% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and 1.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080.

Q: What are the memory capacities of the two cards?

A: The RX 7700 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory. Both use a 192 bit bus width and achieve 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6144 shading units, which is 77.8% more than the RX 7700 XT's 3456 shading units. However, the LX PRO has no listed ray tracing cores, while the RX 7700 XT has 54.

Q: What is the FP16 performance difference?

A: The LX PRO delivers 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, which is 39.8% higher than the RX 7700 XT's 35.17 TFLOPS FP16. The RX 7700 XT uses a 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, while the LX PRO uses a 2:1 ratio.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RX 7700 XT has a TDP of 245 W and requires two 8-pin power connectors. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and requires a single 16-pin connector. Both suggest a 550 W power supply.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7700 XT wins in every category where measured data exists. Its average benchmark score of 22549 is the only non-zero average in this comparison. Its percentile ranking of 67 versus the LX PRO's 50 indicates that, based on the database's overall distribution, the RX 7700 XT sits higher among all GPUs. In pixel rate, the RX 7700 XT delivers 244.2 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, a 27.2% advantage. In texture rate, it delivers 549.5 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, a 43.1% advantage. In FP32 throughput, it delivers 35.17 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, a 43.1% advantage. It is also the only card with ray tracing cores, listing 54 of them, and the only card with defined clock speeds. The RX 7700 XT has a higher TDP at 245 W versus 225 W, which is consistent with its higher rated throughput.

The LX PRO wins in specific architectural and capacity categories. Its 24 GB memory capacity is double the RX 7700 XT's 12 GB, which matters for workloads that require very large frame buffers. Its shading unit count of 6144 exceeds the RX 7700 XT's 3456 by 77.8%. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS exceeds the RX 7700 XT's 35.17 TFLOPS by 39.8%, which can benefit compute workloads that use reduced precision. The LX PRO also has a lower TDP of 225 W versus 245 W, a single 16-pin power connector instead of two 8-pin connectors, and a shorter physical length of 248 mm versus 267 mm. Its 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs allow for four simultaneous display connections, while the RX 7700 XT offers one HDMI 2.1a, two DisplayPort 2.1, and one USB Type-C.

The data does not support a performance win for the LX PRO because no benchmark results are recorded. The architectural advantages it holds, memory capacity, shader count, and FP16 throughput, are real from the specification sheet, but they remain unverified by any measured test. The RX 7700 XT, with a full suite of benchmark scores and a percentile rank of 67, is the only card in this comparison with demonstrated performance data. Any use case that depends on verified frame rates, compute scores, or direct comparisons to other GPUs aligns with the RX 7700 XT. Use cases that demand maximum memory capacity or raw FP16 compute on paper align with the LX PRO, but those advantages come without any recorded confirmation of real-world performance.