AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Intel Arc A750 Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT and Intel Arc A750 represent two distinct approaches to the graphics card market, with the AMD card positioned as a higher-tier RDNA 3.0 part and the Intel card as an end-of-life Alchemist product. Benchmark data shows a decisive overall performance gap: the RX 7700 XT wins 9 of 10 head-to-head tests, with an average benchmark score of 22,549 compared to the Arc A750's 20,582. The single test where Intel prevails is a significant one, however, and the specific workloads in question reveal a more nuanced story than the raw win count suggests.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The RX 7700 XT's dominance is most pronounced in compute and legacy DirectX workloads. In PassMark's GPU Compute test, the AMD card scores 12,912 against Intel's 5,368, a 140.5% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison and reflects a fundamental difference in raw processing capability. Similarly, in PassMark DirectX 11, the RX 7700 XT scores 232 versus 72, a 222.2% margin that indicates the AMD architecture is far better suited to that API's rendering path. DirectX 9 results follow the same pattern, with AMD winning 294 to 181, a 62.4% lead.

The gap narrows considerably in more modern and standardized workloads. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), the RX 7700 XT scores 3,316 against 2,612, a 27% win. PassMark DirectX 12 shows a much tighter race: 79 versus 70, a 12.9% advantage for AMD. This suggests that while the AMD card is consistently faster, the performance delta shrinks as the API workload becomes more representative of contemporary game engines. The Geekbench OpenCL result reinforces the compute-heavy narrative, with AMD posting 138,383 versus 98,554, a 40.4% lead.

The one clear Intel victory is in Geekbench Vulkan, where the Arc A750 scores 85,631 against the RX 7700 XT's 46,443 — a 45.8% margin in Intel's favor. This is a massive reversal and highlights that the Arc A750's Xe-HPG architecture has a particular strength in Vulkan's explicit, low-overhead API model. It is importantly this single win does not translate to other benchmarks, as 3DMark Steel Nomad (also DX12-adjacent) and all PassMark tests favor AMD.

In the legacy DirectX tests, the differences are stark but the absolute scores are low. PassMark DirectX 10 shows AMD at 119 versus 65 (83.1% lead), while DirectX 9 shows 294 versus 181 (62.4% lead). PassMark G2D (2D graphics) also favors AMD, 1,161 to 732, a 58.6% margin. The overall PassMark G3D score, which aggregates several tests, lands at 22,547 for AMD and 12,534 for Intel, a 79.9% difference that aligns with the average benchmark score gap of roughly 9.6%.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different process nodes and architectures. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT uses the Navi 32 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process, with 28,100 million transistors packed into a 346 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The Intel Arc A750 uses the DG2-512 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process, with 21,700 million transistors spread across a larger 406 mm² die, resulting in a lower density of 53.4M per mm². The smaller, denser AMD die is a direct consequence of the more advanced manufacturing node.

Memory configurations differ significantly. The RX 7700 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a wider 256-bit bus, achieving 512.0 GB/s. Despite having less memory, Intel's card has 18.5% more bandwidth, which is a notable advantage for bandwidth-sensitive workloads. However, the capacity difference means the AMD card can hold more textures and data locally, a factor that becomes critical at higher resolutions.

Shader and texture resources are closely matched on paper, with Intel holding a slight edge in raw unit counts. The Arc A750 has 3,584 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, while the RX 7700 XT has 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Yet the AMD card's higher clock speeds (boost 2,544 MHz vs 2,400 MHz) and RDNA 3.0 design yield far higher throughput: the RX 7700 XT reaches 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 versus 17.20 TFLOPS for Intel, and a texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s versus 537.6 GTexel/s. The pixel rate tells a similar story, with AMD at 244.2 GPixel/s and Intel at 268.8 GPixel/s.

Ray tracing cores differ in count and design philosophy. The RX 7700 XT has 54 RT cores, while the Arc A750 has 28. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API feature parity is maintained. The power envelope is comparable, with AMD rated at 245 W TDP and Intel at 225 W, both requiring a 550 W suggested PSU and dual-slot cooling. The AMD card uses two 8-pin power connectors, while Intel uses one 6-pin and one 8-pin. Display outputs are similar, though AMD offers a USB Type-C port that Intel lacks.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7700 XT is the clear winner for general-purpose GPU compute and legacy API gaming. Its 40.4% lead in Geekbench OpenCL and 140.5% lead in PassMark GPU Compute indicate strong performance in productivity applications, rendering, and non-gaming workloads that rely on OpenCL. For older games that use DirectX 9, 10, or 11, the AMD card is vastly superior, with margins ranging from 62.4% to 222.2%. This makes it the safer choice for a broad library of existing titles.

The RX 7700 XT also wins in the modern DX12 space, as shown by its 27% lead in 3DMark Steel Nomad and 12.9% lead in PassMark DirectX 12. While the margin narrows, AMD still holds the advantage in the most relevant API for current AAA releases. Its larger 12 GB memory capacity provides more headroom for high-resolution textures and future game requirements compared to the 8 GB Arc A750.

The Arc A750's single head-to-head win is in Geekbench Vulkan, where it scores 45.8% higher than the RX 7700 XT. This indicates that for Vulkan-based game engines and applications, the Intel card is not just competitive but decisively faster. This is a meaningful win for a specific and increasingly popular API, particularly in Linux gaming and certain cross-platform titles. However, this advantage does not extend to any other test in the suite, and the A750's overall average score of 20,582 places it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, just one point below the RX 7700 XT's 67th percentile.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is the stronger overall GPU. It wins 9 of 10 benchmarks, with an average score of 22,549 that is 9.6% higher than the Arc A750's 20,582. For users prioritizing compute performance, legacy DirectX compatibility, or modern DX12 gaming, the RX 7700 XT is the superior choice. Its 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is more than double the Arc A750's 17.20 TFLOPS, and its 12 GB memory buffer is 50% larger.

The Intel Arc A750 is not without merits. Its 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth exceeds the AMD card's 432.0 GB/s, and its Vulkan performance is exceptional, as evidenced by the 85,631 Geekbench score. However, with an end-of-life production status and a win in only one of ten tests, it is positioned as a niche product for users who primarily run Vulkan workloads and value the higher memory bus width. The RX 7700 XT, by contrast, is an active product with broad benchmark superiority, making it the data-driven recommendation for most users.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has an average benchmark score of 22,549, compared to the Intel Arc A750's 20,582, a difference of roughly 9.6%.

Q: In which benchmark does the Intel Arc A750 beat the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT?

A: The Intel Arc A750 wins in Geekbench Vulkan, scoring 85,631 against the RX 7700 XT's 46,443, a 45.8% margin.

Q: What is the memory capacity and bus width difference?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel Arc A750 has 8 GB on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do the FP32 compute performances compare?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT delivers 35.17 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc A750 delivers 17.20 TFLOPS FP32, making the AMD card more than twice as fast in this metric.

Q: What are the production statuses of the two cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has an "Active" production status, while the Intel Arc A750 is marked as "End-of-life."

Q: Which card requires more power connectors?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT uses two 8-pin power connectors, while the Intel Arc A750 uses one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector. Both have a suggested PSU of 550 W.