AMD Radeon RX 7700 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Radeon RX 7700 shows a mature benchmark profile with nine distinct test results. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO currently has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, leaving its average benchmark score at zero. This absence of measured data makes direct numerical comparison impossible for most tests, but the available specifications and the RX 7700's percentile position allow for meaningful analysis.

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 delivers an average benchmark score of 15,852 across all recorded tests. This places it at the 58th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The closest rival in the database is the AMD Radeon R9 370X with an average score of 15,862, which is essentially identical at a delta of -0.1%. The RX 7700 sits 1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16,014 score) and 1.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16,129 score). Against the AMD Radeon Pro W5500, the RX 7700 leads by 1.1%, with that card scoring 15,679.

In individual tests, the RX 7700 shows its strongest result in the Passmark G3D benchmark with a score of 20,974. The Passmark G2D test records 1,206 points, while the Geekbench OpenCL result reaches 106,028. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test produces a score of 2,865. Passmark GPU compute delivers 10,963 points. Legacy DirectX tests show 261 for DirectX 9, 186 for DirectX 11, 96 for DirectX 12, and 92 for DirectX 10.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no head-to-head benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, and it holds a 50th percentile position among all GPUs. Without measured scores, the comparison relies on architectural and specification differences rather than direct test results.

The Verdict

The data indicates the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the only one of the two cards with verified benchmark results. Its 58th percentile ranking and average score of 15,852 place it in the middle-upper tier of the database, with performance essentially matching the R9 370X and sitting within 1.7% of the RTX 3060 Ti. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO's zero average score and empty benchmark array mean it has no recorded performance evidence to compare.

For users who require measured performance data, the RX 7700 is the clear choice. The card has nine recorded benchmark scores, a defined percentile position, and a stable set of nearest rivals that provide context for its performance level. The LX PRO offers specifications on paper but no verified results, making any performance claims unsubstantiated by the database.

The RX 7700's 58th percentile means it outperforms 58% of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the R9 370X, is effectively tied at -0.1%, indicating that the RX 7700's performance cluster is well established. The 1.1% lead over the Pro W5500 and the 1% gap behind the RX 9060 further define its competitive position.

For buyers, the RX 7700 is the only card with data supporting its capabilities. The LX PRO's lack of benchmarks prevents any recommendation based on measured performance. Users who prioritize verified results should select the RX 7700. The LX PRO remains an unknown quantity with no recorded evidence of its real-world performance.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 wins in every category where data exists. Its nine benchmark scores cover DirectX 9 through DirectX 12, OpenCL, 3DMark, G2D, G3D, and GPU compute workloads. The DirectX 9 score of 261 and DirectX 11 score of 186 suggest strong legacy API performance. The DirectX 12 score of 96 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2,865 indicate modern workload capability. The G3D score of 20,974 and the GPU compute score of 10,963 show balanced general-purpose and compute performance.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark wins because no benchmarks have been recorded. Its specification sheet suggests potential advantages in specific areas, but without test data, these cannot be confirmed. The LX PRO lists 24 GB of GDDR6 memory compared to the RX 7700's 16 GB, which could benefit memory-heavy workloads if the card performs as specified. Its FP16 compute of 49.15 TFLOPS is double its FP32 rate, indicating a 2:1 ratio that may accelerate certain half-precision tasks.

The RX 7700's FP16 and FP32 rates are identical at 25.18 TFLOPS, showing a 1:1 ratio. This means the RX 7700 does not accelerate half-precision workloads relative to full precision, while the LX PRO potentially doubles its throughput in FP16 operations. The RX 7700 counters with higher pixel rate at 236.1 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and higher texture rate at 393.4 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

Memory bandwidth favors the RX 7700 at 624.1 GB/s compared to 432.0 GB/s for the LX PRO. The RX 7700 uses a 256-bit memory bus while the LX PRO uses a 192-bit bus. The RX 7700's memory clock runs at 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX PRO. These differences give the RX 7700 a 44% bandwidth advantage, which can matter in texture-heavy and high-resolution workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15,852. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0 because no benchmarks have been recorded for it.

Q: How does the RX 7700 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7700 is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15,862 score), 1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16,014 score), 1.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16,129 score), and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15,679 score).

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two cards?

A: The RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 624.1 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has higher compute throughput in FP32?

A: The RX 7700 has 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The LX PRO has 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, making the RX 7700 slightly higher by 0.6 TFLOPS.

Q: What are the manufacturing process nodes for each card?

A: The RX 7700 uses a 5 nm process node from TSMC with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The LX PRO uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.

Q: Do both cards support the same API levels?

A: Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7700 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 uses the Navi 32 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation and the Radeon RX 7000 series. The chip contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, produced on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The transistor density is 81.2 million per square millimeter.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip built on TrueGPU architecture, with no codename listed. It belongs to the 7G100 generation and has no series designation. The manufacturer is listed as unknown. The chip is produced on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but transistor count, die size, and transistor density are all listed as unknown.

The RX 7700 has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It includes 40 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It lists no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores.

Ray tracing support differs significantly. The RX 7700 has dedicated ray tracing hardware with 40 RT cores. The LX PRO has no listed RT cores, meaning its ray tracing capability, if any, is unconfirmed. The RX 7700's RDNA 3.0 architecture includes ray tracing acceleration as a core feature, while the TrueGPU architecture of the LX PRO does not specify this capability.

Compute ratios also differ. The RX 7700 delivers FP16 at the same rate as FP32, both at 25.18 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO delivers FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS versus FP32 at 24.58 TFLOPS, a 2:1 ratio. This suggests the LX PRO may be optimized for half-precision workloads, though no benchmark data confirms this.

The RX 7700 has a predecessor in Navi II and a successor in Navi IV. The LX PRO lists no predecessor and no successor. The RX 7700 was released on September 17, 2025, while the LX PRO was released on March 16, 2026. Both cards are listed as Active in production status.

Specification Differences

Clock speeds differ substantially. The RX 7700 has defined clocks with a base of 1900 MHz, boost of 2459 MHz, and game clock of 2041 MHz. The LX PRO lists no base, boost, or game clocks. Memory clocks are 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) for the RX 7700 and 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX PRO.

Memory size differs with the RX 7700 at 16 GB and the LX PRO at 24 GB, both using GDDR6. Bus width is 256-bit for the RX 7700 and 192-bit for the LX PRO. Bandwidth is 624.1 GB/s for the RX 7700 and 432.0 GB/s for the LX PRO.

Shading units are 2,560 for the RX 7700 versus 6,144 for the LX PRO. Texture mapping units are 160 versus 192. Render output units are identical at 96. Ray tracing cores exist only on the RX 7700 with 40 cores; the LX PRO has none listed.

Pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s for the RX 7700 and 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX PRO. Texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s for the RX 7700 and 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX PRO. FP32 compute is 25.18 TFLOPS for the RX 7700 and 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX PRO. FP16 compute is 25.18 TFLOPS for the RX 7700 and 49.15 TFLOPS for the LX PRO.

Thermal design power is 200 W for the RX 7700 and 225 W for the LX PRO. Both are dual-slot cards. Power connectors differ with the RX 7700 using 2x 8-pin and the LX PRO using 1x 16-pin. Both suggest a 550 W power supply.

Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for both cards. Display outputs differ: the RX 7700 provides 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C. The LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Physical dimensions differ. The RX 7700 measures 267 mm in length (10.5 inches), 135 mm in height (5.3 inches), and 50 mm in width (2 inches). The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length (9.8 inches), 118 mm in height (4.6 inches), and 48 mm in width (1.9 inches). The LX PRO is shorter, lower, and slightly narrower, which may simplify case compatibility.

Vulkan support differs with the RX 7700 at version 1.4 and the LX PRO at version 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7700 belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series with a known manufacturer, while the LX PRO has no series and an unknown manufacturer. The process node is 5 nm for the RX 7700 and 6 nm for the LX PRO.