AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits these two GPUs into very different competitive categories. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has two benchmark entries in the database, while the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has no recorded benchmark scores. This absence of data means the comparison is structurally one-sided. The RX 7650 GRE delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, with no entries listed.

The RX 7650 GRE sits at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, which places it above the median performance tier. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 sits at the 50th percentile, though this percentile is assigned without any measured benchmark scores. The RX 7650 GRE has nearest rivals that include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER with an average score of 43223 and a delta of -1.2%, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB with 43262 and -1.2%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile with 43268 and -1.3%, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 with 43301 and -1.3%. These deltas indicate that the RX 7650 GRE trails each of those four rivals by about 1.2% to 1.3% in average benchmark score. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has no nearest rivals listed, so no comparative positioning exists within the database.

The use-case split is therefore defined by data availability. For synthetic DirectX 12 and OpenCL workloads, the RX 7650 GRE is the only one of the two with measurable results. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 cannot be ranked on the same scale because the database contains no scores for it. What the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 does offer is a different physical and architectural profile: a 16 GB memory capacity, a 256 bit memory bus, and a 150 W TDP. The RX 7650 GRE offers 8 GB on a 128 bit bus at 170 W. These figures suggest different design targets, but benchmark wins, as recorded, belong entirely to the RX 7650 GRE.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers and different architectural generations. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish and the generation label Navi III (RX 7000). It is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses the AD103 chip built on Ada Lovelace architecture, with the generation label Ada-MW. It is also fabricated by TSMC, but on a 5 nm process. The process node difference is small but measurable: 6 nm versus 5 nm.

Transistor counts differ substantially. The RX 7650 GRE contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The NVIDIA part packs more than three times the transistor count and nearly double the density per square millimeter.

Core configurations also diverge sharply. The RX 7650 GRE has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 raster output units, 32 ray tracing cores, and no tensor cores listed. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, 112 raster output units, 76 ray tracing cores, and 304 tensor cores. The NVIDIA GPU has roughly 4.75 times the shading units, 2.375 times the TMUs, 1.75 times the ROPs, and 2.375 times the ray tracing cores. The presence of 304 tensor cores on the NVIDIA part is a structural difference, as the AMD part has no tensor core count recorded.

Clock behavior differs as well. The RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz, with no game clock listed. The AMD part runs at substantially higher clocks, while the NVIDIA part relies on a much wider shader array. Memory clock is the same at 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective for both. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RX 7650 GRE uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The RX 7650 GRE is a dual-slot card with a 1x 8-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is an IGP form factor with no power connectors listed and no suggested PSU. Display outputs differ: the AMD card offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the NVIDIA part is listed as Portable Device Dependent.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the only one of the two with recorded performance evidence. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109 give it a measurable position at the 83rd percentile. Its average benchmark score of 42723 places it within 1.3% of four NVIDIA rivals, all of which score slightly higher. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has no benchmark scores, no rivals, and an average score of zero. On the basis of what the database records, the RX 7650 GRE is the supported choice for anyone seeking measurable synthetic performance data.

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 does show strengths in the specification table. It has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256 bit bus with 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, compared to 8 GB on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s for the RX 7650 GRE. It also has a higher pixel rate at 188.2 GPixel/s versus 172.5 GPixel/s, a higher texture rate at 510.7 GTexel/s versus 345.0 GTexel/s, and higher FP32 throughput at 32.69 TFLOPS versus 22.08 TFLOPS. These figures indicate that the NVIDIA part has more raw compute resources on paper. However, without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm how those specifications translate into measured performance.

The RX 7650 GRE is the part with a launch MSRP of 279 USD, an active production status, and a release date of 2025-02-06. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has no launch MSRP, an active production status, and a release date of 2023-03-20. The RX 7650 GRE is a desktop add-in board with defined dimensions of 204 mm length and 115 mm height. The NVIDIA part has no dimensions listed and is an IGP, meaning it is designed for integration rather than standalone installation. The verdict from the recorded data is that the RX 7650 GRE is the only GPU with demonstrated benchmark performance, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 remains an unmeasured specification sheet.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42723. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmark entries.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each GPU?

A: The RX 7650 GRE is at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is at the 50th percentile.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256 bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the TDP figures for these GPUs?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has a TDP of 150 W.

Q: Does the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 have tensor cores?

A: Yes, it has 304 tensor cores. The RX 7650 GRE has no tensor core count listed in the database.

Q: What process nodes are used by each GPU?

A: The RX 7650 GRE is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two GPUs. The winsA and winsB fields are both 0, and the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty. The available comparison therefore relies on the individual benchmark records of the RX 7650 GRE and the absence of any records for the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2.

The RX 7650 GRE scores 2336 in 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 83109. These two results are the only measured performance data in the comparison. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has an empty benchmarks array, so there are no scores to place alongside those results. The nearest rivals of the RX 7650 GRE provide context for its average score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER averages 43223, which is 1.2% higher than the RX 7650 GRE. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB averages 43262, also 1.2% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile averages 43268, 1.3% higher. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 averages 43301, 1.3% higher. All four rivals outscore the RX 7650 GRE by a narrow margin, placing it just below that cluster of NVIDIA products.

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has no rivals listed in the database. Its percentile of 50 is the default midpoint, but it carries no measured benchmark support. In the absence of direct scores, the specification data can be used to identify where the NVIDIA part would theoretically compete. Its FP32 throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS is 48% higher than the RX 7650 GRE's 22.08 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s is 48% higher than 345.0 GTexel/s. Its memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s is exactly double the 288.0 GB/s of the RX 7650 GRE. These are large theoretical advantages, but the database offers no measured confirmation of how they perform in actual workloads.

The RX 7650 GRE counters with higher clock speeds. Its boost clock of 2695 MHz is 60% higher than the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2's 1680 MHz. Its base clock of 1720 MHz is 85% higher than 930 MHz. The AMD part also has a game clock of 2350 MHz, a figure the NVIDIA part does not list. The RX 7650 GRE is the only one of the two with any recorded frame-level or compute-level benchmark output, so any head-to-head analysis must default to the AMD part as the measured performer.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every major specification field. The RX 7650 GRE is built on a 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is built on a 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. Transistor density is 65.2M per mm² for AMD and 121.1M per mm² for NVIDIA. The architecture names differ: RDNA 3.0 versus Ada Lovelace. The codename is Hotpink Bonefish for AMD, with none listed for NVIDIA. The generation labels are Navi III (RX 7000) versus Ada-MW.

Memory capacity is 8 GB for the RX 7650 GRE and 16 GB for the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2. Both use GDDR6, but the bus width is 128 bit versus 256 bit, and bandwidth is 288.0 GB/s versus 576.0 GB/s. Shading units are 2048 versus 9728. TMUs are 128 versus 304. ROPs are 64 versus 112. Ray tracing cores are 32 versus 76. Tensor cores are absent from the AMD listing and present at 304 on the NVIDIA part. Pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s versus 188.2 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 345.0 GTexel/s versus 510.7 GTexel/s. FP32 is 22.08 TFLOPS versus 32.69 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 22.08 TFLOPS versus 32.69 TFLOPS, both at a 1:1 ratio.

Clock specifications show the AMD part running much faster. Base clock is 1720 MHz versus 930 MHz. Boost clock is 2695 MHz versus 1680 MHz. The RX 7650 GRE has a game clock of 2350 MHz, while the NVIDIA part has none listed. Memory clock is identical at 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective. TDP is 170 W for AMD and 150 W for NVIDIA. The RX 7650 GRE is a dual-slot card with a 1x 8-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is an IGP with no power connectors and no suggested PSU. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 for AMD, versus Portable Device Dependent for NVIDIA. The RX 7650 GRE measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height, while the NVIDIA part has no dimensions listed. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Release dates are 2025-02-06 for the RX 7650 GRE and 2023-03-20 for the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2. The RX 7650 GRE has a launch MSRP of 279 USD, while the NVIDIA part has none.