AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation Comparison
AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation. The database lists two benchmark scores for the AMD part: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109. For the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation, no benchmark scores are recorded, and its average benchmark score sits at 0 with a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, by contrast, holds an average benchmark score of 42723 and ranks in the 83rd percentile.
The AMD card's nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (average score 43223, delta -1.2%), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43262, delta -1.2%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43268, delta -1.3%), and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43301, delta -1.3%). This places the RX 7650 GRE within roughly 1.3% of those four GPUs, slightly below each in average score. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation has no nearest rivals listed, so no comparable delta values exist.
The absence of head-to-head tests means the only quantitative comparison available is the gap in average benchmark scores and percentiles. The AMD part's 42723 average score against the NVIDIA part's 0 recorded average is a function of missing data for the mobile GPU, not a measured performance differential. The percentile gap, 83 versus 50, similarly reflects the different data populations behind each entry. The AMD card has two distinct benchmark entries, while the NVIDIA mobile part has none, so any direct score comparison would be misleading.
FAQ
Q: What benchmark scores are recorded for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE?
A: The database lists a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109. Its average benchmark score across recorded tests is 42723.
Q: What benchmark scores are recorded for the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation?
A: No benchmark scores are recorded for this GPU. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed in the database.
Q: How do the two GPUs compare in memory bandwidth?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE delivers 288.0 GB/s, while the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation delivers 256.0 GB/s. Both use 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.
Q: What are the transistor counts and die sizes?
A: The AMD chip (Navi 33) contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a density of 65.2M per mm². The NVIDIA chip (AD107) contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, giving a density of 118.9M per mm².
Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE reaches 22.08 TFLOPS, while the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation reaches 12.99 TFLOPS. Both list FP16 at the same figures with a 1:1 ratio.
Q: What are the power requirements?
A: The AMD card has a TDP of 170 W with a suggested PSU of 450 W and a single 8-pin connector. The NVIDIA mobile part has a TDP of 50 W and requires no power connectors.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation uses the AD107 chip built on Ada Lovelace architecture and belongs to the Ada-MW generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC.
Transistor density differs substantially: the AMD die packs 13,300 million transistors across 204 mm² for a density of 65.2M per mm², while the NVIDIA die packs 18,900 million transistors across a smaller 159 mm² for a density of 118.9M per mm². The NVIDIA chip is denser in both absolute transistor count and per-area density.
The AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It includes 32 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The NVIDIA part has 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. It includes 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores. The tensor core count is a notable architectural difference: the NVIDIA GPU includes dedicated tensor hardware, while the AMD GPU does not list any.
The AMD GPU has a higher pixel rate at 172.5 GPixel/s versus 101.5 GPixel/s for the NVIDIA part, and a higher texture rate at 345.0 GTexel/s versus 203.0 GTexel/s. FP32 compute favors AMD at 22.08 TFLOPS versus 12.99 TFLOPS. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the NVIDIA part uses PCIe 4.0 x16.
Specification Differences
The two GPUs differ across several specification fields. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses a 6 nm process node, while the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation uses 5 nm, both from TSMC. The AMD card's base clock is 1720 MHz with a boost of 2695 MHz and a game clock of 2350 MHz. The NVIDIA part's base clock is 1635 MHz with a boost of 2115 MHz and no listed game clock. Memory clocks also differ: the AMD part runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the NVIDIA part runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective.
Memory bandwidth favors the AMD card at 288.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s, despite both having 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. Shading units differ: 2048 for AMD versus 3072 for NVIDIA. TMUs are 128 versus 96, and ROPs are 64 versus 48. Ray tracing cores are 32 for AMD versus 24 for NVIDIA, and tensor cores are absent for AMD versus 96 for NVIDIA.
Pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s for AMD versus 101.5 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rate is 345.0 GTexel/s versus 203.0 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 both show 22.08 TFLOPS for AMD versus 12.99 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. TDP differs dramatically: 170 W for AMD versus 50 W for NVIDIA. The AMD card is dual-slot with a 204 mm length and 115 mm height, while the NVIDIA part is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no listed dimensions.
Power connectors differ: the AMD card requires one 8-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU, while the NVIDIA part requires no connectors and has no suggested PSU listed. The AMD card has a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the NVIDIA part uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs also differ: the AMD card provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the NVIDIA part lists portable device dependent outputs.
Release dates differ, with the AMD card released on 2025-02-06 and the NVIDIA part on 2023-03-20. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 279 USD, while the NVIDIA part has no launch MSRP recorded. The AMD card's predecessor is Navi II and successor is Navi IV, while the NVIDIA part's predecessor is Ampere-MW and successor is Blackwell-MW.
The Verdict
The data indicates two GPUs built for different physical contexts. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a dual-slot desktop card with a 170 W TDP, a 204 mm length, a 450 W suggested PSU, and discrete display outputs. The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation is an IGP with a 50 W TDP, no power connectors, no dimensions, and portable device dependent outputs. The form factor alone separates their intended deployments.
On compute metrics, the AMD card leads in FP32 (22.08 TFLOPS versus 12.99 TFLOPS), pixel rate (172.5 GPixel/s versus 101.5 GPixel/s), texture rate (345.0 GTexel/s versus 203.0 GTexel/s), and memory bandwidth (288.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s). It also has more ray tracing cores (32 versus 24), more TMUs (128 versus 96), and more ROPs (64 versus 48). The NVIDIA part counters with more shading units (3072 versus 2048), 96 tensor cores, a denser transistor layout (118.9M per mm² versus 65.2M per mm²), and a significantly lower 50 W TDP.
The benchmark database does not provide measured scores for the NVIDIA part, so no validated performance comparison is possible from recorded results. The AMD card's 83rd percentile and 42723 average score come from actual entries, while the NVIDIA part's 50th percentile and 0 average score reflect missing data. Users selecting between these parts should weigh the AMD card's higher raw throughput metrics and recorded benchmark presence against the NVIDIA part's tensor core support and far lower power envelope, which suits mobile integration. The AMD card also carries a launch MSRP of 279 USD, while the NVIDIA part has none recorded.