AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

CORE STATE Navi 33
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2695 MHz
TDP 170 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2115 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,336
N/A
geekbench_opencl
83,109
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation. The database lists two benchmark scores for the AMD part: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109. For the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation, no benchmark scores are recorded, and its average benchmark score sits at 0 with a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, by contrast, holds an average benchmark score of 42723 and ranks in the 83rd percentile.

The AMD card's nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (average score 43223, delta -1.2%), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43262, delta -1.2%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43268, delta -1.3%), and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43301, delta -1.3%). This places the RX 7650 GRE within roughly 1.3% of those four GPUs, slightly below each in average score. The RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation has no nearest rivals listed, so no comparable delta values exist.

The absence of head-to-head tests means the only quantitative comparison available is the gap in average benchmark scores and percentiles. The AMD part's 42723 average score against the NVIDIA part's 0 recorded average is a function of missing data for the mobile GPU, not a measured performance differential. The percentile gap, 83 versus 50, similarly reflects the different data populations behind each entry. The AMD card has two distinct benchmark entries, while the NVIDIA mobile part has none, so any direct score comparison would be misleading.

FAQ

Q: What benchmark scores are recorded for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE?

A: The database lists a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109. Its average benchmark score across recorded tests is 42723.

Q: What benchmark scores are recorded for the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation?

A: No benchmark scores are recorded for this GPU. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed in the database.

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE delivers 288.0 GB/s, while the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation delivers 256.0 GB/s. Both use 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: What are the transistor counts and die sizes?

A: The AMD chip (Navi 33) contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a density of 65.2M per mm². The NVIDIA chip (AD107) contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, giving a density of 118.9M per mm².

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE reaches 22.08 TFLOPS, while the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation reaches 12.99 TFLOPS. Both list FP16 at the same figures with a 1:1 ratio.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The AMD card has a TDP of 170 W with a suggested PSU of 450 W and a single 8-pin connector. The NVIDIA mobile part has a TDP of 50 W and requires no power connectors.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation uses the AD107 chip built on Ada Lovelace architecture and belongs to the Ada-MW generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Transistor density differs substantially: the AMD die packs 13,300 million transistors across 204 mm² for a density of 65.2M per mm², while the NVIDIA die packs 18,900 million transistors across a smaller 159 mm² for a density of 118.9M per mm². The NVIDIA chip is denser in both absolute transistor count and per-area density.

The AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It includes 32 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The NVIDIA part has 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. It includes 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores. The tensor core count is a notable architectural difference: the NVIDIA GPU includes dedicated tensor hardware, while the AMD GPU does not list any.

The AMD GPU has a higher pixel rate at 172.5 GPixel/s versus 101.5 GPixel/s for the NVIDIA part, and a higher texture rate at 345.0 GTexel/s versus 203.0 GTexel/s. FP32 compute favors AMD at 22.08 TFLOPS versus 12.99 TFLOPS. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the NVIDIA part uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across several specification fields. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses a 6 nm process node, while the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation uses 5 nm, both from TSMC. The AMD card's base clock is 1720 MHz with a boost of 2695 MHz and a game clock of 2350 MHz. The NVIDIA part's base clock is 1635 MHz with a boost of 2115 MHz and no listed game clock. Memory clocks also differ: the AMD part runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the NVIDIA part runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective.

Memory bandwidth favors the AMD card at 288.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s, despite both having 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. Shading units differ: 2048 for AMD versus 3072 for NVIDIA. TMUs are 128 versus 96, and ROPs are 64 versus 48. Ray tracing cores are 32 for AMD versus 24 for NVIDIA, and tensor cores are absent for AMD versus 96 for NVIDIA.

Pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s for AMD versus 101.5 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rate is 345.0 GTexel/s versus 203.0 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 both show 22.08 TFLOPS for AMD versus 12.99 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. TDP differs dramatically: 170 W for AMD versus 50 W for NVIDIA. The AMD card is dual-slot with a 204 mm length and 115 mm height, while the NVIDIA part is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no listed dimensions.

Power connectors differ: the AMD card requires one 8-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU, while the NVIDIA part requires no connectors and has no suggested PSU listed. The AMD card has a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the NVIDIA part uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs also differ: the AMD card provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the NVIDIA part lists portable device dependent outputs.

Release dates differ, with the AMD card released on 2025-02-06 and the NVIDIA part on 2023-03-20. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 279 USD, while the NVIDIA part has no launch MSRP recorded. The AMD card's predecessor is Navi II and successor is Navi IV, while the NVIDIA part's predecessor is Ampere-MW and successor is Blackwell-MW.

The Verdict

The data indicates two GPUs built for different physical contexts. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a dual-slot desktop card with a 170 W TDP, a 204 mm length, a 450 W suggested PSU, and discrete display outputs. The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation is an IGP with a 50 W TDP, no power connectors, no dimensions, and portable device dependent outputs. The form factor alone separates their intended deployments.

On compute metrics, the AMD card leads in FP32 (22.08 TFLOPS versus 12.99 TFLOPS), pixel rate (172.5 GPixel/s versus 101.5 GPixel/s), texture rate (345.0 GTexel/s versus 203.0 GTexel/s), and memory bandwidth (288.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s). It also has more ray tracing cores (32 versus 24), more TMUs (128 versus 96), and more ROPs (64 versus 48). The NVIDIA part counters with more shading units (3072 versus 2048), 96 tensor cores, a denser transistor layout (118.9M per mm² versus 65.2M per mm²), and a significantly lower 50 W TDP.

The benchmark database does not provide measured scores for the NVIDIA part, so no validated performance comparison is possible from recorded results. The AMD card's 83rd percentile and 42723 average score come from actual entries, while the NVIDIA part's 50th percentile and 0 average score reflect missing data. Users selecting between these parts should weigh the AMD card's higher raw throughput metrics and recorded benchmark presence against the NVIDIA part's tensor core support and far lower power envelope, which suits mobile integration. The AMD card also carries a launch MSRP of 279 USD, while the NVIDIA part has none recorded.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 7650 GRE
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,048
3,072 +50.0%
Shaders
2,048
3,072 +50.0%
TMUs
128
96 -25.0%
ROPs
64
48 -25.0%
Compute Units
32
—
SM Count
—
24
Clocks
Base Clock
1720 MHz
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
2695 MHz
2115 MHz
Game Clock
2350 MHz
—
Shader Clock
2350 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
8,192 0.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
288.0 GB/s
256.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
12 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
—
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
172.5 GPixel/s
101.5 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
345.0 GTexel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
22.08 TFLOPS
12.99 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
689.9 GFLOPS (1:32)
203.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
22.08 TFLOPS (1:1)
12.99 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
32
24 -25.0%
Tensor Cores
—
96
Matrix Cores
64
—
Power
TDP
170 W
50 W
TDP (W)
170
50 -70.6%
Suggested PSU
450 W
—
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Navi 33
AD107
Codename
Hotpink Bonefish
—
Generation
Navi III (RX 7000)
Ada-MW (x000A)
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
13,300 million
18,900 million
Die Size
204 mm²
159 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
65.2M / mm²
118.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
—
8.9
Shader Model
6.9
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Length
204 mm 8 inches
—
Height
115 mm 4.5 inches
—
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
279 USD
—
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Navi II
Ampere-MW
Successor
Navi IV
Blackwell-MW
View Radeon RX 7650 GRE Details View RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation Details