AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data places the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE in a distinctly different performance tier than the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. The AMD card holds an 83rd percentile rank among all GPUs in the database, while the NVIDIA embedded part sits at the 50th percentile. The RX 7650 GRE achieves an average benchmark score of 42,723, whereas the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, yielding an average of zero.

Looking at the direct measurements available for the AMD card, it scores 2,336 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test and 83,109 in Geekbench OpenCL. These figures place it in close competition with several NVIDIA desktop and mobile parts. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER with an average score of 43,223, which sits just 1.2% above the RX 7650 GRE. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB also averages 43,262, again 1.2% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile averages 43,268, a 1.3% advantage, and the original NVIDIA Quadro M6000 averages 43,301, also 1.3% ahead.

The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has no nearest rivals listed and no head-to-head benchmark entries, so direct score comparisons between the two cards cannot be drawn from the database. What the data does show is the gap in raw compute output. The AMD card delivers 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the NVIDIA part delivers 12.35 TFLOPS. That is a substantial difference in theoretical compute throughput. The pixel rate tells a similar story: the RX 7650 GRE achieves 172.5 GPixel/s versus 96.48 GPixel/s for the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. Texture rate also favors AMD at 345.0 GTexel/s compared to 193.0 GTexel/s.

The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation does counter with hardware that the AMD card lacks entirely. It includes 96 tensor cores, a feature absent from the RX 7650 GRE specification. The NVIDIA part also has 3,072 shading units versus 2,048 on the AMD card, though the AMD card compensates with 128 texture mapping units and 64 raster output units against 96 and 48 respectively. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation also has 24 ray tracing cores, while the RX 7650 GRE has 32.

Memory bandwidth favors AMD. Both cards use 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, but the RX 7650 GRE reaches 288.0 GB/s, while the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation peaks at 256.0 GB/s. Clock speeds reinforce this: the AMD card has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2695 MHz, while the NVIDIA part runs at 1530 MHz base and 2010 MHz boost. The AMD card also has a game clock of 2350 MHz, which the NVIDIA part does not list.

The Verdict

Benchmark results indicate that the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the stronger performer in raw graphics workloads. Its 83rd percentile ranking, 42,723 average score, and 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 output place it in a competitive range with desktop cards like the RTX 4070 SUPER, which sits just 1.2% higher. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation, with its 50th percentile and no recorded benchmarks, cannot match that level of measured performance.

The choice between these two cards depends entirely on the intended deployment context. The RX 7650 GRE is an active, dual-slot desktop card with a 170 W TDP, a 1x 8-pin power connector, and a suggested 450 W power supply. It measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height. It was released on February 6, 2025, and carries a launch MSRP of 279 USD. Its display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 50 W TDP and no power connectors. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and its display outputs are described as portable device dependent. It was released on March 20, 2023, and has no launch MSRP recorded. Its predecessor is listed as Ampere-MW, and its successor as Blackwell-MW.

For a desktop workstation or gaming build where performance is the priority, the data supports the RX 7650 GRE. For an embedded or mobile application with strict power limits, the RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation uses 120 W less power, which the database shows as the difference between a 170 W and a 50 W TDP. The NVIDIA part also has tensor cores, which the AMD card lacks, making it the only option of the two for workloads that rely on those units.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different architectural generations. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture on the Navi 33 chip, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation and its predecessor is listed as Navi II, with Navi IV as its successor. The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on the AD107 chip, within the Ada-MW generation. Its predecessor is Ampere-MW and its successor is Blackwell-MW.

The manufacturing processes differ. AMD uses a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. NVIDIA uses a 5 nm process, also at TSMC, with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.9 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip packs more transistors into a smaller area, but the AMD chip has the larger overall die.

The API support is identical on both cards. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The shading architecture differs in count and ratio. The RX 7650 GRE has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has 3,072 shading units, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and 24 ray tracing cores, plus 96 tensor cores. The AMD card has more TMUs and ROPs despite fewer shading units. The NVIDIA card has more shading units and the only tensor core implementation.

Memory architecture is similar in capacity and bus width but differs in speed. Both use 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. AMD runs its memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, producing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. NVIDIA runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, producing 256.0 GB/s. The AMD memory clock is higher and delivers 32 GB/s more bandwidth.

The power delivery design could not be more different. The RX 7650 GRE is a dual-slot card with a 1x 8-pin power connector and a 170 W TDP, requiring a 450 W power supply. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation is an IGP with no power connectors and a 50 W TDP, with no suggested PSU listed. The AMD card is built for a standard desktop power envelope, while the NVIDIA part is designed for embedded integration where power draw is minimal.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation differ across nearly every measurable specification. The AMD card uses a 6 nm process node at TSMC, while the NVIDIA part uses 5 nm at TSMC. Transistor counts differ: 13,300 million for AMD versus 18,900 million for NVIDIA. Die size is 204 mm² for AMD and 159 mm² for NVIDIA. Transistor density is 65.2 million per square millimeter for AMD and 118.9 million for NVIDIA.

Clock speeds show AMD with the advantage. The RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2695 MHz, plus a game clock of 2350 MHz. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has a base clock of 1530 MHz and a boost clock of 2010 MHz, with no game clock listed. Memory clocks are 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for AMD versus 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective for NVIDIA.

Memory bandwidth is 288.0 GB/s for AMD and 256.0 GB/s for NVIDIA. The shading unit count is 2,048 for AMD and 3,072 for NVIDIA. TMUs number 128 for AMD and 96 for NVIDIA. ROPs are 64 for AMD and 48 for NVIDIA. Ray tracing cores are 32 for AMD and 24 for NVIDIA. Tensor cores exist only on NVIDIA at 96 count, with none listed for AMD.

Pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s for AMD and 96.48 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rate is 345.0 GTexel/s for AMD and 193.0 GTexel/s for NVIDIA. FP32 and FP16 are both 22.08 TFLOPS for AMD and 12.35 TFLOPS for NVIDIA, each at a 1:1 ratio. TDP is 170 W for AMD and 50 W for NVIDIA. Slot width is dual-slot for AMD and IGP for NVIDIA. Power connectors are 1x 8-pin for AMD and none for NVIDIA. The suggested PSU is 450 W for AMD, with none listed for NVIDIA.

Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for AMD and PCIe 4.0 x16 for NVIDIA. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 for AMD, while NVIDIA lists portable device dependent. Dimensions are 204 mm length and 115 mm height for AMD, with no dimensions recorded for NVIDIA. Release dates are February 6, 2025 for AMD and March 20, 2023 for NVIDIA. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 279 USD, while NVIDIA has none recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation delivers 12.35 TFLOPS.

Q: How do the memory bandwidths compare?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus at 18 Gbps effective. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has 256.0 GB/s from the same 8 GB GDDR6 and 128-bit bus but at 16 Gbps effective.

Q: Does either card have tensor cores?

A: Only the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has tensor cores, with 96 units. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE lists no tensor cores in its specifications.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has a 170 W TDP and requires a 450 W power supply with a 1x 8-pin connector. The RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has a 50 W TDP and uses no power connectors, with no suggested PSU listed.

Q: How does the RX 7650 GRE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7650 GRE averages 42,723 in benchmark scores. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER averages 43,223, which is 1.2% higher. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB averages 43,262, also 1.2% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile averages 43,268 at 1.3% higher, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 averages 43,301 at 1.3% higher.

Q: Which card has a higher pixel rate?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE achieves 172.5 GPixel/s, while the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation achieves 96.48 GPixel/s.