AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE represent two very different strategies in the current GPU landscape. The RTX 4070 SUPER is a high-end Ada Lovelace part with a large die and premium memory subsystem, while the RX 7650 GRE is a compact, power-efficient RDNA 3.0 offering. The benchmark data reveals a decisive performance gap, with the NVIDIA card leading in every measured test, though the AMD card’s active production status and lower launch MSRP position it as a distinct alternative for specific use cases.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The available head-to-head data shows a commanding lead for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER across both tested workloads. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 4070 SUPER scores 4627 points against the RX 7650 GRE’s 2336, a delta of 98.1% in NVIDIA’s favor. This is not a marginal victory; it is nearly double the performance in a modern DirectX 12 gaming scenario. The Geekbench OpenCL compute test tells a similar story, with NVIDIA posting 172,795 points versus AMD’s 83,109, a 107.9% advantage. These results indicate that in raw synthetic workloads, the RTX 4070 SUPER operates in a different performance tier entirely.

The average benchmark scores reinforce this hierarchy. The RTX 4070 SUPER holds an average score of 43,223 across its ten recorded benchmarks, while the RX 7650 GRE averages 42,723 across its two. Interestingly, the AMD card’s nearest rival list includes the RTX 4070 SUPER at a delta of -1.2%, meaning the RX 7650 GRE’s average score is only 1.2% below NVIDIA’s. This seems contradictory to the head-to-head deltas, but it is explained by the limited benchmark set for AMD—the RX 7650 GRE only has two recorded tests, and both are heavily NVIDIA-favorable. The RTX 4070 SUPER’s additional benchmarks, including PassMark and Geekbench Vulkan tests, pull its average down relative to its Steel Nomad and OpenCL dominance.

Looking at the RTX 4070 SUPER’s broader benchmark profile, it shows consistent strength across many APIs. It scores 29,995 in PassMark G3D, 17,108 in PassMark GPU Compute, and 205,624 in Geekbench Vulkan. The RX 7650 GRE simply lacks comparable data points, making a full-spectrum comparison impossible. However, the two tests that do overlap are unambiguous: the RTX 4070 SUPER wins both by roughly 100% margins. The data shows no scenario in the overlapping tests where the AMD card closes the gap, suggesting that the architectural and silicon advantages of the NVIDIA part are decisive in these workloads.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 4070 SUPER in 3DMark Steel Nomad?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER scores 4627 versus the RX 7650 GRE’s 2336, a 98.1% advantage. This means NVIDIA delivers nearly double the frame throughput in this DX12 benchmark.

Q: Does the RX 7650 GRE win any overlapping benchmark?

A: No. Across the two shared tests—3DMark Steel Nomad and Geekbench OpenCL—the RTX 4070 SUPER wins both. The winsA count is 2 for NVIDIA and 0 for AMD.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER averages 43,223 across ten tests, while the RX 7650 GRE averages 42,723 across two tests. NVIDIA leads by 500 points, but this margin is misleading because AMD’s sparse benchmark set skews the comparison.

Q: How do the nearest rivals compare for each card?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER’s closest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB at 43,262, just 0.1% higher. The RX 7650 GRE’s closest rival is the RTX 4070 SUPER itself at 43,223, which is 1.2% higher than AMD’s average.

Q: Which card has a higher percentile ranking?

A: Both cards sit at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. Despite the large performance gap in head-to-head tests, their overall positioning relative to the entire GPU market is identical.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER offers 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth from 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus. The RX 7650 GRE provides 288.0 GB/s from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. NVIDIA’s bandwidth is 75% higher.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 SUPER wins in every measurable performance category. In gaming-oriented DX12 workloads, its 98.1% lead in Steel Nomad makes it the clear choice for high-refresh-rate and high-resolution gaming. In compute-heavy applications like OpenCL, the 107.9% advantage positions it as a superior option for GPU-accelerated tasks such as rendering, video encoding, or scientific workloads. The data suggests that any user prioritizing raw throughput should favor NVIDIA.

The RX 7650 GRE has its own appeal, though not in raw performance. Its launch MSRP is 279 USD, which is less than half of the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 599 USD. It also has a lower TDP of 170 W versus 220 W, making it a more power-efficient option for compact builds or systems with modest power supplies—it requires a 450 W PSU versus NVIDIA’s 550 W suggestion. Its physical dimensions are notably smaller at 204 mm in length versus 267 mm for NVIDIA, and it uses a single 8-pin power connector instead of NVIDIA’s 16-pin. For users with space or power constraints, the AMD card is the more practical fit, even if it sacrifices performance.

The production status also favors AMD. The RX 7650 GRE is listed as “Active,” while the RTX 4070 SUPER is “End-of-life.” This means the AMD card is currently available in the market, whereas NVIDIA’s part is being phased out in favor of its GeForce 50-series successor. For buyers seeking a current-generation product with ongoing availability, AMD holds the advantage.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ substantially in nearly every core specification. The RTX 4070 SUPER uses the AD104 chip with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, while the RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. NVIDIA’s transistor density is 121.8 million per mm², nearly double AMD’s 65.2 million per mm². Clock speeds favor AMD in boost: 2695 MHz versus NVIDIA’s 2475 MHz, but NVIDIA has a higher base clock at 1980 MHz versus 1720 MHz.

Memory is another major differentiator. NVIDIA offers 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, while AMD has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s. The shading unit count heavily favors NVIDIA: 7168 versus 2048. NVIDIA also has 224 TMUs and 80 ROPs, compared to AMD’s 128 TMUs and 64 ROPs. Ray tracing cores favor NVIDIA at 56 versus 32, and NVIDIA uniquely includes 224 tensor cores, which AMD lacks entirely.

Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern. NVIDIA delivers 198.0 GPixel/s and 554.4 GTexel/s, while AMD manages 172.5 GPixel/s and 345.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 35.48 TFLOPS for NVIDIA versus 22.08 TFLOPS for AMD. The bus interface differs as well: NVIDIA uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while AMD uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which could impact bandwidth in CPU-bound scenarios. Display outputs also differ, with NVIDIA offering 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, while AMD provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, supporting newer display standards.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is stark. NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture is built on a 5 nm process from TSMC, while AMD’s RDNA 3.0 uses a 6 nm process, also from TSMC. The smaller node allows NVIDIA to pack far more transistors—35,800 million versus 13,300 million—into a larger die of 294 mm² versus 204 mm². This translates into significantly higher compute resources, as evidenced by the 7168 shading units versus 2048, and the inclusion of dedicated tensor cores for AI workloads, which AMD’s Navi 33 entirely lacks.

AMD’s RDNA 3.0 employs a chiplet-style design philosophy, with the Navi 33 chip codenamed “Hotpink Bonefish.” NVIDIA’s AD104 is a monolithic die. The RX 7650 GRE compensates for fewer cores with a higher boost clock of 2695 MHz versus NVIDIA’s 2475 MHz, but this cannot overcome the sheer scale difference. NVIDIA’s RT cores are more numerous at 56 versus 32, providing better hardware-accelerated ray tracing performance. The lack of tensor cores on AMD means no dedicated AI acceleration, which is a notable omission for modern upscaling and machine-learning features.

Power efficiency is where AMD’s architecture shines. The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W, significantly lower than the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 220 W. This is achieved despite the older 6 nm node, suggesting AMD’s design prioritizes efficiency over brute force. The memory architecture also differs: NVIDIA uses faster GDDR6X, while AMD uses standard GDDR6, contributing to NVIDIA’s bandwidth advantage. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical. The RX 7650 GRE is the newer product, released on 2025-02-06, while the RTX 4070 SUPER launched on 2024-01-16, making NVIDIA the older but more powerful option.