AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a discrete desktop graphics card from the Radeon RX 7000 series. It uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with a 6 nm process from TSMC, and was released on February 6, 2025. Its launch MSRP is 279 USD.

Q: What is the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is an integrated graphics processor based on the Raptor Lake chip, using Generation 12.2 architecture. It was released on January 3, 2023, and is built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has no launch MSRP recorded in the database.

Q: How do the two compare in memory configuration?

A: The Radeon RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile uses System Shared memory, with a System Shared bus width and System Dependent bandwidth. The AMD card operates at a memory clock of 2250 MHz, equivalent to 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What are the TDP figures for both products?

A: The Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W, while the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has a TDP of 15 W. The AMD card requires a 450 W suggested PSU and uses a single 8-pin power connector. The Intel integrated part has no power connector and no suggested PSU listed.

Q: Which product has recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: The Radeon RX 7650 GRE has two recorded benchmarks: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has no recorded benchmark entries, and its average benchmark score is 0. The database records no head-to-head benchmark wins for either product.

Q: What are the API support differences?

A: The Radeon RX 7650 GRE supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, but the AMD card has a higher DirectX feature level.

The Verdict

The data in the database separates these two products cleanly by role and performance class. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE sits at the 83rd percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 42723. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0, and it has no recorded benchmark entries in the database. That percentile gap, 83 versus 50, plus the absence of any recorded scores for the Intel part, indicates the AMD card is the clear performance choice for any workload that relies on sustained graphics compute.

The AMD card uses 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It also includes 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, and 8 render output units, with no ray tracing cores recorded. The AMD card delivers 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel part delivers 819.2 GFLOPS of FP32 compute. The AMD card outputs 172.5 GPixel/s and 345.0 GTexel/s, versus 12.80 GPixel/s and 25.60 GTexel/s for the Intel part. These figures place the two in different tiers entirely.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a dual-slot discrete card that is 204 mm long and 115 mm high, with a 170 W TDP and a 450 W suggested PSU. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is an IGP with a 15 W TDP, no slot width beyond the integrated package, no power connector, and no dimensions listed. The AMD card is suited for a desktop build with a dedicated power supply and a PCIe 4.0 x8 slot. The Intel part is suited for portable devices where the display outputs are dependent on the specific device design.

For users selecting between these two, the data points in one direction. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE has recorded performance, a higher percentile rank, dedicated memory, and ray tracing capability. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has no recorded performance data, no dedicated memory, and no ray tracing. The AMD card also carries a launch MSRP of 279 USD, while the Intel part has none recorded. The verdict from the database is that the Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the only option with demonstrated performance data, and it outperforms the Intel integrated solution across every measured specification.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two products, and the wins counter shows zero for both. However, the recorded specifications and the benchmark scores that do exist provide a basis for comparison.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has no recorded scores for either test. The average benchmark score for the AMD card is 42723, while the Intel part has an average benchmark score of 0. The nearest rivals to the AMD card in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER with an average score of 43223, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB with 43262, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile with 43268, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 with 43301. The AMD card trails these by 1.2% to 1.3%. That places the Radeon RX 7650 GRE in a competitive position near the top of the recorded range, while the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has no comparable data.

In raw compute, the FP32 throughput of the AMD card is 22.08 TFLOPS, which is 27 times the 819.2 GFLOPS of the Intel part. The AMD card also reaches 22.08 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel part reaches 1.638 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate of the AMD card is 172.5 GPixel/s, which is over 13 times the 12.80 GPixel/s of the Intel part. The texture rate of the AMD card is 345.0 GTexel/s, which is over 13 times the 25.60 GTexel/s of the Intel part.

Clock speeds also separate the two. The AMD card has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2350 MHz, and a boost clock of 2695 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1600 MHz. The AMD card has no game clock listed, but its base clock alone exceeds the Intel boost clock.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, with a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has no transistor count, die size, or density recorded. The AMD card is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel part is on a 10 nm process at Intel.

The memory bandwidth difference is substantial. The AMD card has 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus. The Intel part has System Shared memory, System Shared bus width, and System Dependent bandwidth. There is no fixed bandwidth figure for the Intel part, which makes direct comparison difficult, but the AMD card has a dedicated and fixed memory pipeline.

The database also records the AMD card's position relative to all GPUs at the 83rd percentile, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile. That percentile gap reflects the absence of recorded performance data for the Intel part and the presence of strong recorded data for the AMD card.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

Chip and architecture: The AMD card uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture and the codename Hotpink Bonefish. The Intel part uses the Raptor Lake chip with Generation 12.2 architecture and no codename recorded.

Process and foundry: The AMD card is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel part is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Transistors and die: The AMD card has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, with a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The Intel part has no transistor count, die size, or density recorded.

Clocks: The AMD card has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. Its memory clock is 2250 MHz, equivalent to 18 Gbps effective. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1600 MHz, with no game clock listed and System Shared memory clock.

Memory: The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part has System Shared memory, System Shared type, System Shared bus width, and System Dependent bandwidth.

Compute units: The AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and no ray tracing cores.

Rates: The AMD card outputs 172.5 GPixel/s and 345.0 GTexel/s, with 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.08 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The Intel part outputs 12.80 GPixel/s and 25.60 GTexel/s, with 819.2 GFLOPS FP32 and 1.638 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio.

Power and cooling: The AMD card has a TDP of 170 W, is dual-slot, uses a 1x 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Intel part has a TDP of 15 W, is an IGP, has no power connector, and no suggested PSU.

Bus interface: The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The Intel part uses Ring Bus.

Display outputs: The AMD card has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The Intel part has display outputs that are Portable Device Dependent.

Dimensions: The AMD card is 204 mm long and 115 mm high. The Intel part has no dimensions listed.

Release date: The AMD card was released on February 6, 2025. The Intel part was released on January 3, 2023.

Generation and succession: The AMD card is in the Navi III (RX 7000) generation, with a predecessor of Navi II and a successor of Navi IV. The Intel part is in the HD Graphics-M (Raptor Lake) generation, with no predecessor recorded and a successor of Arc Graphics-M.

Production status: Both are listed as Active.

Architecture Differences

The architecture of the two products reflects their different design goals. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses RDNA 3.0, a discrete GPU architecture built for high throughput. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile uses Generation 12.2, an integrated graphics architecture built for low power consumption within a mobile processor.

The AMD card is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, which allows for 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The Intel part is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with no transistor count or die size recorded. The process difference alone suggests a significant gap in density and efficiency potential, though the database only records the process nodes themselves.

The AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The Intel part has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The AMD card also includes 32 ray tracing cores, which the Intel part does not have. That means the AMD card can accelerate ray tracing workloads, while the Intel part has no such hardware recorded.

The memory architecture differs fundamentally. The AMD card uses 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus, with a fixed bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The Intel part uses System Shared memory, meaning it relies on the host system's memory for all graphics data. Its bandwidth is listed as System Dependent, which means there is no fixed value in the database.

The FP32 compute of the AMD card is 22.08 TFLOPS, while the Intel part is 819.2 GFLOPS. The FP16 figures also differ: the AMD card reaches 22.08 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel part reaches 1.638 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The 1:1 FP16 ratio on the AMD card indicates full-rate FP16 throughput, while the 2:1 ratio on the Intel part indicates half-rate FP16 throughput.

The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes features associated with the highest DirectX 12 feature level. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), which is one feature level lower. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

The AMD card is a dual-slot discrete card with a 170 W TDP and a 1x 8-pin power connector. It requires a 450 W suggested PSU and connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. The Intel part is an IGP with a 15 W TDP, no power connector, no suggested PSU, and a Ring Bus interface. Power consumption differs by 155 W between the two, which reflects the difference between a standalone graphics card and an integrated processor component.

The AMD card has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2695 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1600 MHz. The AMD card also has a game clock of 2350 MHz, which is not a field recorded for the Intel part.

The display outputs also differ. The AMD card provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The Intel part has display outputs that are Portable Device Dependent, meaning the actual outputs depend on the specific device it is integrated into.

The release dates separate the two by about two years. The Intel part was released on January 3, 2023, while the AMD card was released on February 6, 2025. The Intel part has a successor listed as Arc Graphics-M, while the AMD card has a successor of Navi IV. The AMD card has a predecessor of Navi II, while the Intel part has no predecessor recorded.