AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data does not include any direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100. The head-to-head benchmark list is empty, and neither product shows wins in a direct comparison. This absence of shared test data means a score-by-score breakdown is not possible from the database.

What the database does provide is a single average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE of 42,723. This figure places the card in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs tracked. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile. The AMD card also has two individual benchmark entries: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83,109. The Intel part has no recorded benchmark entries at all.

The nearest rivals for the AMD card provide context for its average score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER averages 43,223, which is 1.2% higher than the RX 7650 GRE. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB averages 43,262, also 1.2% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile averages 43,268, 1.3% higher, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 averages 43,301, again 1.3% higher. These deltas are small, indicating the RX 7650 GRE sits in a tight performance band near these cards. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 has no nearest rivals listed, so no comparative score data exists for it.

Because there are no shared benchmarks, any direct performance comparison must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than measured test outcomes. The database shows no evidence of either card outperforming the other in any recorded workload.

Architecture Differences

The two accelerators come from different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III generation, which is the RX 7000 series. The chip is manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 uses the Ponte Vecchio chip on the Generation 12.5 architecture, part of the Data Center GPU generation. Intel fabricates this chip on a 10 nm process at its own foundry.

Transistor counts differ dramatically. The AMD chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a die size of 204 mm², yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The Intel chip packs 100,000 million transistors into a 1,280 mm² die, giving a density of 78.1 million per mm². The Intel part is roughly 7.5 times larger in die area and holds about 7.5 times more transistors. The higher density on the Intel side reflects a more crowded layout per square millimeter.

Clock behavior also separates the two. The AMD card runs a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. Its memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The Intel card has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 1550 MHz, with no game clock listed. Its memory clock is 600 MHz, or 1200 Mbps effective. The AMD part operates at substantially higher frequencies, while the Intel part compensates with a much wider memory interface and more execution resources.

Memory architecture is a major divergence. The AMD card uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel card uses 48 GB of HBM2e on an 8192-bit bus, delivering 1.23 TB/s. The Intel memory bus is 64 times wider, and bandwidth is more than four times higher. The AMD card has a pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 345.0 GTexel/s. The Intel card has a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s and a texture rate of 694.4 GTexel/s. The Intel texture rate is roughly double, but it has no pixel output capability.

Compute resources differ in scale. The AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel card has 7168 shading units, 448 texture mapping units, 0 render output units, and 56 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 3.5 times the shading units and 3.5 times the TMUs, plus 1.75 times the ray tracing cores. FP32 and FP16 performance are nearly identical between the two: 22.08 TFLOPS for AMD and 22.22 TFLOPS for Intel, both at 1:1 FP16 ratios.

API support shows differences as well. The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel card supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, with no Vulkan support listed. The Intel part also has no display outputs, while the AMD card provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

Where Each One Wins

The data points to clear use-case separation. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a graphics card with full display output support. It includes HDMI 2.1a and DisplayPort 2.1 connections, a pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. These features indicate it is built for rendering frames to a screen. Its 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest by modern standards but sufficient for typical gaming workloads. The card sits in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 42,723, showing it performs well in general GPU tasks.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 is not a display adapter. It has no display outputs, pixel rate listed as 0 MPixel/s, and no game clock. Its strengths lie elsewhere. The 48 GB HBM2e memory with 1.23 TB/s bandwidth and 8192-bit bus is built for large data sets that do not fit in smaller frame buffers. The 7168 shading units and 448 TMUs provide high compute throughput for data-parallel workloads. The FP32 performance of 22.22 TFLOPS is essentially identical to the AMD card, but the memory capacity and bandwidth are in a different class. This configuration suits compute tasks where data residency and bandwidth matter more than rasterization.

The AMD card wins in any scenario that requires a video output. Its display connectors, pixel rate, and game clock make it the only viable choice for interactive graphics. The Intel card wins in scenarios that demand massive memory capacity and bandwidth. The 48 GB frame buffer is 6 times larger than the AMD card's 8 GB, and the 1.23 TB/s bandwidth is more than 4 times higher. For workloads that process large matrices, big simulation grids, or high-resolution datasets, the Intel part has the resources to keep data on-chip.

The recorded average benchmark score for the AMD card is 42,723, placing it in the 83rd percentile. The Intel card has no recorded average score, and its percentile rank of 50 is based on no benchmark entries. This suggests the database has no measured evidence of the Intel card's real-world performance, making its capabilities harder to quantify.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every measurable specification. The process node is 6 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. Transistor count is 13,300 million versus 100,000 million. Die size is 204 mm² versus 1,280 mm². Transistor density is 65.2M per mm² versus 78.1M per mm².

Clock speeds diverge: base 1720 MHz versus 1000 MHz, boost 2695 MHz versus 1550 MHz. The AMD card has a game clock of 2350 MHz, while the Intel card has none. Memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus 600 MHz (1200 Mbps effective).

Memory configuration differs sharply: 8 GB GDDR6 versus 48 GB HBM2e, 128-bit versus 8192-bit bus, 288.0 GB/s versus 1.23 TB/s bandwidth.

Compute units: 2048 shading units versus 7168, 128 TMUs versus 448, 64 ROPs versus 0, 32 ray tracing cores versus 56.

Rates: pixel rate 172.5 GPixel/s versus 0 MPixel/s, texture rate 345.0 GTexel/s versus 694.4 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 are 22.08 TFLOPS versus 22.22 TFLOPS, both at 1:1.

Power and connectivity: TDP 170 W versus 300 W, power connector 1x 8-pin versus 1x 12-pin, suggested PSU 450 W versus 700 W. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 5.0 x16.

Physical dimensions: the AMD card is 204 mm (8 inches) long and 115 mm (4.5 inches) high. The Intel card is 267 mm (10.5 inches) long, with no height listed. Both are dual-slot.

Release timing differs: the AMD card launched on 2025-02-06, while the Intel card launched on 2023-01-09. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 279 USD. The Intel card has no launch MSRP recorded.

API support: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6 for both, Vulkan 1.4 for AMD and none for Intel.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 has 48 GB of HBM2e, while the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6.

Q: Can the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 output video to a display?

A: No. The Intel card has no display outputs and a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s, while the AMD card provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

Q: How does the raw compute performance compare?

A: FP32 performance is nearly identical: 22.08 TFLOPS for the AMD card and 22.22 TFLOPS for the Intel card. FP16 is also 1:1 for both at the same TFLOPS figures.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Intel card delivers 1.23 TB/s over an 8192-bit bus, while the AMD card delivers 288.0 GB/s over a 128-bit bus. The Intel bandwidth is more than four times higher.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD card has a boost clock of 2695 MHz, compared to 1550 MHz for the Intel card.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The AMD card has a TDP of 170 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Intel card has a TDP of 300 W and a suggested PSU of 700 W.

The Verdict

The data shows two accelerators built for different jobs. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a conventional graphics card with display outputs, a pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s, and a boost clock of 2695 MHz. Its average benchmark score of 42,723 places it in the 83rd percentile, with nearest rivals all within 1.3% of its score. This card is ready for interactive rendering, and its 8 GB memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sized for standard frame buffers.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 is a compute accelerator without display capability. It has no outputs, no pixel rate, and no game clock. Its strengths are memory capacity and bandwidth: 48 GB HBM2e at 1.23 TB/s, with 7168 shading units and 448 TMUs. FP32 performance matches the AMD card at 22.22 TFLOPS, but the Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores, leaving its real-world performance unmeasured in the database.

A builder choosing between these two should base the decision on output requirements and memory needs. If the task requires a visible frame, the AMD card is the only option. If the task involves large datasets that exceed 8 GB, the Intel card has the capacity. The AMD card also carries a launch MSRP of 279 USD, while the Intel card has no recorded price.

The Intel part uses a 10 nm process, 100,000 million transistors, and a 1,280 mm² die, reflecting a large-scale data center design. The AMD card uses a 6 nm process, 13,300 million transistors, and a 204 mm² die, reflecting a compact consumer part. These are not direct competitors; they serve different segments of the hardware market. Pick the AMD card for graphics output and gaming workloads, pick the Intel card for compute tasks that need 48 GB of memory and high bandwidth.