AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs AMD Radeon RX 9060 Comparison

# AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs AMD Radeon RX 9060

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is the clear aggregate winner in this matchup, taking 8 of 10 head-to-head benchmarks and posting a 43.2% lead in the modern 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. However, the RX 7600S counters with a massive 87.1% victory in Geekbench Vulkan and a 47.7% edge in Passmark DirectX 12, making this a split decision that depends heavily on workload. The RX 9060 is a newer, denser, and faster part on paper, but the RX 7600S holds its own in specific API scenarios and does so at a much lower power envelope.

The Verdict

Pick the AMD Radeon RX 9060 if you prioritize raw throughput, modern API performance, and compute workloads. Its average benchmark score of 16014 places it within 0.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, while the RX 7600S’s 16696 average sits just 0.6% behind the NVIDIA T400 4 GB. In direct comparison, the RX 9060 wins decisively in 3DMark Steel Nomad (3322 vs 1888), Geekbench OpenCL (88183 vs 68012), Passmark G3D (17631 vs 15408), and Passmark GPU Compute (9919 vs 6520). The RX 9060 also ranks at the 59th percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 7600S ranks at the 60th — statistically a wash, but the RX 9060’s wins come in more demanding, modern tests.

Choose the AMD Radeon RX 7600S if you need Vulkan performance or DirectX 12 efficiency in a low-power, integrated form factor. Its 73868 Geekbench Vulkan score dwarfs the RX 9060’s 39476, and its 65 Passmark DirectX 12 score beats the RX 9060’s 44. The RX 7600S also draws just 75 W compared to the RX 9060’s 132 W, and its IGP slot width means no power connectors are required. For battery-constrained laptops or systems where Vulkan titles dominate, the RX 7600S is the better fit. For everything else, the RX 9060’s higher clocks, larger transistor budget, and newer architecture make it the superior all-rounder.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two is generational. The RX 7600S uses RDNA 3.0 on the Navi 33 chip, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die — a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The RX 9060 moves to RDNA 4.0 on the Navi 44 chip (codename Strix Point), fabricated on a 4 nm process, packing 29,700 million transistors into a slightly smaller 199 mm² die. That yields a density of 149.2 million transistors per mm² — more than double the RX 7600S.

Both cards share identical core counts: 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. Neither has tensor cores. The difference lies in how those units are clocked and fed. The RX 7600S has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a game clock of 1865 MHz, and a boost of 2200 MHz. The RX 9060 starts at 1700 MHz base, hits 2400 MHz in games, and boosts to 2990 MHz — a 790 MHz advantage at peak. That clock delta drives the RX 9060’s higher pixel rate (191.4 GPixel/s vs 140.8 GPixel/s) and texture rate (334.9 GTexel/s vs 246.4 GTexel/s).

Memory configurations are similar in capacity and type — both use 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus — but the RX 9060 runs faster memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), yielding 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth against 256.0 GB/s. The FP32 compute figures diverge significantly: the RX 9060 delivers 21.43 TFLOPS versus 15.77 TFLOPS for the RX 7600S. Notably, FP16 performance on the RX 9060 is identical to FP32 at 21.43 TFLOPS (1:1), while the RX 7600S doubles FP32 to 31.54 TFLOPS (2:1).

The interface and power delivery also differ. The RX 9060 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, a dual-slot cooler, and a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 300 W. The RX 7600S is an IGP with no power connectors and runs on PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs on the RX 9060 are fixed at 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a, while the RX 7600S’s outputs are portable-device dependent.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The RX 9060 wins the most important modern test by a wide margin: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 shows 3322 vs 1888, a 43.2% lead. This is the headline result — the RX 9060 is dramatically faster in current-generation DirectX 12 rendering. The gap narrows in Geekbench OpenCL, where the RX 9060 scores 88183 against 68012, a 22.9% advantage. Compute-heavy workloads clearly favor the newer architecture.

The RX 9060 also sweeps the older Passmark API tests. In Passmark DirectX 10, it scores 104 vs 74 (28.8% ahead). Passmark DirectX 11 shows 182 vs 140 (23.1% ahead). Passmark DirectX 9 yields 280 vs 211 (24.6% ahead). Even the 2D test, Passmark G2D, favors the RX 9060 at 1002 vs 776 (22.6% ahead). The Passmark G3D result is closer: 17631 vs 15408, a 12.6% margin. Passmark GPU Compute goes decisively to the RX 9060 at 9919 vs 6520, a 34.3% lead.

The RX 7600S’s two wins are stark. Geekbench Vulkan shows the RX 7600S at 73868 vs 39476 for the RX 9060 — an 87.1% blowout. This is the single largest delta in the entire comparison, suggesting the older RDNA 3.0 architecture has a significant Vulkan optimization advantage or driver maturity edge. Passmark DirectX 12 also goes to the RX 7600S at 65 vs 44, a 47.7% margin, which is counterintuitive given the RX 9060’s dominant Steel Nomad DX12 performance. These two results indicate API-specific quirks rather than a universal performance hierarchy.

Looking at the broader picture, the RX 9060’s 8-2 win count aligns with its architectural superiority, but the magnitude of the RX 7600S’s Vulkan victory shows that raw specs don’t tell the whole story. The RX 9060’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (0.7% faster), while the RX 7600S trades blows with the NVIDIA T400 4 GB (0.6% faster). Both cards sit in a similar performance tier overall, but the RX 9060’s wins are concentrated in tests that matter more for modern gaming and compute.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600S | AMD Radeon RX 9060 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 4.0 |

| Chip | Navi 33 | Navi 44 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 4 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 29,700 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 199 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 149.2M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1500 MHz | 1700 MHz |

| Game Clock | 1865 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz | 2990 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |

| Pixel Rate | 140.8 GPixel/s | 191.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 246.4 GTexel/s | 334.9 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 15.77 TFLOPS | 21.43 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 31.54 TFLOPS (2:1) | 21.43 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 132 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 300 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2025-08-04 |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | Navi III |

The only identical specs are shading units (1792), TMUs (112), ROPs (64), RT cores (28), memory size (8 GB), memory type (GDDR6), bus width (128 bit), DirectX version (12 Ultimate), OpenGL (4.6), and Vulkan (1.4). Everything else differs, with the most consequential differences being process node, clock speeds, transistor count, and power draw.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 wins decisively with a score of 3322 compared to the RX 7600S’s 1888, a 43.2% advantage.

Q: Is the RX 7600S better at any modern API?

A: Yes. In Geekbench Vulkan, the RX 7600S scores 73868 versus 39476 for the RX 9060, an 87.1% lead. It also wins Passmark DirectX 12 at 65 vs 44 (47.7% ahead).

Q: How do their transistor counts compare?

A: The RX 9060 packs 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die (149.2M per mm²), while the RX 7600S has 13,300 million on a 204 mm² die (65.2M per mm²). The RX 9060 has more than double the transistor density.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RX 7600S has a 75 W TDP and requires no power connectors, while the RX 9060 has a 132 W TDP with a single 8-pin connector and a 300 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which card has higher clock speeds?

A: The RX 9060 has a 1700 MHz base, 2400 MHz game, and 2990 MHz boost clock. The RX 7600S runs at 1500 MHz base, 1865 MHz game, and 2200 MHz boost.

Q: How do their overall benchmark averages compare?

A: The RX 7600S has an average benchmark score of 16696 (60th percentile of all GPUs), while the RX 9060 averages 16014 (59th percentile). The RX 7600S is nominally higher, but the RX 9060’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 0.7% faster.