AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT compare to the Lisuan Tech LX PRO in raw compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), while the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT provides 20.23 TFLOPS FP32 and 40.45 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The LX PRO holds a 21.5% advantage in FP32 and a 21.5% lead in FP16.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each GPU?

A: The RX 7600M XT has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is 50% higher memory capacity and exactly 50% more bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel and texture fill rate?

A: The LX PRO achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, compared to the RX 7600M XT's 158.0 GPixel/s and 316.0 GTexel/s. The LX PRO leads by 21.5% in both metrics.

Q: What are the power consumption figures for both cards?

A: The RX 7600M XT has a TDP of 120 W and uses no power connectors (IGP form factor). The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, uses a 1x 16-pin connector, and requires a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores recorded for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO?

A: The database contains no benchmark entries for the LX PRO, with an average benchmark score of 0. The RX 7600M XT has a recorded average benchmark score of 12710 across multiple tests, including 3DMark Steel Nomad (2048), Geekbench OpenCL (74869), and Passmark G3D (13907).

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The RX 7600M XT sits at the 52nd percentile among all GPUs, while the LX PRO is at the 50th percentile. However, the LX PRO's ranking is based on no recorded benchmark results.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT is built on the Navi 33 chip using RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, part of the Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) generation. It uses a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm².

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation. It also uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the transistor count and die size are marked as unknown in the database. The manufacturer is listed as unknown.

The RX 7600M XT has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing cores are listed. The LX PRO's shading unit count is exactly three times that of the RX 7600M XT.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600M XT supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The LX PRO offers a dual-slot form factor with dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width, while the RX 7600M XT is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no listed dimensions.

Clock speeds differ significantly: the RX 7600M XT has a base clock of 1280 MHz, boost clock of 2469 MHz, and game clock of 2023 MHz. The LX PRO has no base, boost, or game clock recorded in the database. Both use GDDR6 memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The RX 7600M XT was released on 2023-01-03, while the LX PRO has a release date of 2026-03-16. The RX 7600M XT lists Polaris Mobile as its predecessor. The LX PRO has no predecessor recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two GPUs, and neither wins nor losses are recorded for either side. The RX 7600M XT has a substantial set of individual benchmark scores, while the LX PRO has none.

The RX 7600M XT's recorded scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2048, Geekbench OpenCL at 74869, Geekbench Vulkan at 27793, Passmark DirectX 10 at 76, Passmark DirectX 11 at 137, Passmark DirectX 12 at 58, Passmark DirectX 9 at 175, Passmark G2D at 894, Passmark G3D at 13907, and Passmark GPU Compute at 7140.

These scores place the RX 7600M XT in proximity to several NVIDIA and AMD rivals. Its average benchmark score of 12710 is 0.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 (12773), 0.7% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm (12625), 0.9% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (12830), and 0.9% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 455 (12831).

The LX PRO's average benchmark score of 0 indicates no recorded data, making direct numerical comparison impossible. However, the theoretical specifications provide a basis for analysis. The LX PRO's FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is 21.5% higher than the RX 7600M XT's 20.23 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s exceeds the RX 7600M XT's 158.0 GPixel/s by the same 21.5% margin, and its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s versus 316.0 GTexel/s also reflects that 21.5% difference.

Memory bandwidth favors the LX PRO at 432.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s, a 50% advantage. The LX PRO's 24 GB memory capacity triples the RX 7600M XT's 8 GB. The LX PRO also has triple the shading units (6144 versus 2048), 1.5 times the TMUs (192 versus 128), and 1.5 times the ROPs (96 versus 64).

The RX 7600M XT does hold advantages in API support, specifically Vulkan 1.4 versus the LX PRO's Vulkan 1.3, and it has ray tracing cores (32) while the LX PRO lists none. The RX 7600M XT also draws significantly less power at 120 W versus 225 W.

The Verdict

Based strictly on recorded data, the RX 7600M XT is the only GPU with actual benchmark scores, making it the empirically validated choice. Its average benchmark score of 12710 places it in the 52nd percentile, with performance comparable to older NVIDIA cards like the GTX 670, GTX 590, and Tesla K20Xm.

The LX PRO presents a theoretical performance profile that suggests substantially higher compute throughput, memory capacity, and bandwidth. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 24 GB memory would position it well above the RX 7600M XT if those specifications translate to real-world results. However, with zero recorded benchmarks, its 50th percentile ranking carries no empirical weight.

The data indicates the LX PRO targets workloads requiring large memory pools and high bandwidth, such as large dataset processing or high-resolution texture work. The RX 7600M XT, with its IGP form factor and 120 W TDP, suits power-constrained portable devices.

Users requiring proven, measured performance with existing benchmark data would select the RX 7600M XT. Users prioritizing maximum theoretical compute and memory capacity, with tolerance for a 225 W TDP and dual-slot footprint, would consider the LX PRO, but the absence of benchmark results introduces uncertainty.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TrueGPU |

| Chip | Navi 33 | 7G105 |

| Generation | Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) | 7G100 |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | Unknown |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | Unknown |

| Base Clock | 1280 MHz | Not listed |

| Boost Clock | 2469 MHz | Not listed |

| Game Clock | 2023 MHz | Not listed |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 128 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 32 | None listed |

| Pixel Rate | 158.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 316.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 20.23 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 40.45 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 120 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 550 W |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2026-03-16 |

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600M XT wins in ray tracing capability, supporting 32 dedicated RT cores where the LX PRO has none recorded. It also supports the newer Vulkan 1.4 API, provides a lower 120 W TDP, and requires no external power connectors, fitting an IGP form factor suitable for portable devices. Its 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die is fully documented, and it has an established predecessor in Polaris Mobile.

The LX PRO wins decisively in raw compute throughput with 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, both 21.5% above the RX 7600M XT. Its 24 GB GDDR6 memory triples the RX 7600M XT's 8 GB, and its 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is 50% higher. The 192-bit bus, 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs all exceed the RX 7600M XT's corresponding specs. The LX PRO's 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s fill rates surpass the RX 7600M XT's 158.0 GPixel/s and 316.0 GTexel/s by 21.5%. It offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs versus the RX 7600M XT's portable-device-dependent display configuration. The LX PRO also has a later release date of 2026-03-16.

The data suggests a clear split: the RX 7600M XT serves ray tracing, portable, and low-power scenarios with proven benchmark results, while the LX PRO targets memory-intensive, high-throughput workloads with maximum theoretical performance, pending any benchmark verification.