AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT compare to the Lisuan Tech LX PRO in raw compute performance?

A: The RX 7600 XT delivers 22.57 TFLOPS FP32, while the LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The LX PRO holds a 9% advantage in FP32 throughput. In FP16, the gap widens: the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) versus the RX 7600 XT's 22.57 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), a 118% lead.

Q: Which card has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO offers 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 7600 XT has 16 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO leads by 50% in capacity and 50% in bandwidth.

Q: What are the physical dimensions and power requirements?

A: The RX 7600 XT is 204 mm long, 115 mm tall, dual-slot, with a 190 W TDP, a 1x 8-pin connector, and a 450 W suggested PSU. The LX PRO is 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, 48 mm wide, dual-slot, with a 225 W TDP, a 1x 16-pin connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which card has better API support?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600 XT supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The RX 7600 XT has the newer Vulkan version.

Q: Does the RX 7600 XT have benchmark data available?

A: Yes. The RX 7600 XT has ten recorded benchmark scores across 3DMark, Geekbench, and Passmark tests, with an average score of 17083 and a 60th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: What are the release dates?

A: The RX 7600 XT was released on 2024-01-23 and has a launch MSRP of 329 USD. The LX PRO's release date is 2026-03-16, and no launch MSRP is recorded.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT and Lisuan Tech LX PRO represent fundamentally different design approaches. The RX 7600 XT belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series, built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation. It also uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, but transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown.

The shading engine configurations diverge sharply. The RX 7600 XT has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, which is three times the shading units, 1.5 times the TMUs, and 1.5 times the ROPs. The LX PRO does not list ray tracing cores, while the RX 7600 XT includes 32 dedicated RT cores.

Clock behavior differs as well. The RX 7600 XT has recorded base (1980 MHz), game (2470 MHz), and boost (2755 MHz) clocks. The LX PRO has no base, game, or boost clock data recorded. Both cards run memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem is a major architectural split. The RX 7600 XT uses 16 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO uses 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The wider bus and larger frame buffer give the LX PRO significantly more memory throughput.

The bus interface also differs: the RX 7600 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16, doubling the available lanes for data transfer between the card and host system.

Display output configurations are distinct. The RX 7600 XT provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, with no HDMI port.

The FP16 compute ratio reveals a key architectural difference. The RX 7600 XT achieves 22.57 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio relative to FP32, indicating equal FP16 and FP32 throughput. The LX PRO achieves 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 throughput is double its FP32 throughput, a configuration suited for workloads that leverage half-precision math.

The Verdict

The data indicates two cards with different strengths. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins on raw compute metrics: higher FP32 (24.58 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS), substantially higher FP16 (49.15 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS), more memory (24 GB vs 16 GB), more bandwidth (432.0 GB/s vs 288.0 GB/s), more shading units (6144 vs 2048), more TMUs (192 vs 128), more ROPs (96 vs 64), and higher pixel and texture rates (192.0 GPixel/s vs 176.3 GPixel/s, 384.0 GTexel/s vs 352.6 GTexel/s).

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT wins on measured results. It has a complete benchmark record with an average score of 17083 and a 60th percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 (avg score 17208, delta -0.7%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (avg score 17037, delta 0.3%), and the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (avg score 17019, delta 0.4%). The LX PRO has zero recorded benchmarks and a 50th percentile ranking with an average score of 0.

The RX 7600 XT also offers a newer Vulkan version (1.4 vs 1.3), a lower TDP (190 W vs 225 W), a smaller physical footprint (204 mm vs 248 mm length), and a simpler power connector (1x 8-pin vs 1x 16-pin). The LX PRO requires a higher suggested PSU (550 W vs 450 W).

For users who need verified, recorded performance data, the RX 7600 XT is the only option with evidence. For users who prioritize memory capacity, bandwidth, and peak FP16 compute on paper, the LX PRO presents a compelling specification sheet, but no benchmark results exist to confirm real-world behavior. The absence of any measured scores for the LX PRO means its actual performance cannot be validated against the RX 7600 XT's recorded results.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every measurable specification.

The RX 7600 XT uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture. The RX 7600 XT is part of the Navi III (RX 7000) generation; the LX PRO is part of the 7G100 generation.

The RX 7600 XT has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die with a density of 65.2M per mm². The LX PRO has unknown transistor count and die size.

Clock speeds: the RX 7600 XT records base 1980 MHz, game 2470 MHz, and boost 2755 MHz. The LX PRO has no clock speed data.

Memory: 16 GB vs 24 GB GDDR6, 128-bit vs 192-bit bus, 288.0 GB/s vs 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute units: 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 32 RT cores for the RX 7600 XT; 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no RT cores listed for the LX PRO.

Rates: pixel rate 176.3 GPixel/s vs 192.0 GPixel/s; texture rate 352.6 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel/s.

FP32: 22.57 TFLOPS vs 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: 22.57 TFLOPS (1:1) vs 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP: 190 W vs 225 W. Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU: 450 W vs 550 W.

Bus interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 vs PCIe 4.0 x16.

Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1a plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1 vs 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Dimensions: 204 mm x 115 mm vs 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm. Both are dual-slot.

API support: both DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6; Vulkan 1.4 vs Vulkan 1.3.

Release date: 2024-01-23 vs 2026-03-16. Launch MSRP: 329 USD for the RX 7600 XT, none recorded for the LX PRO.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark entries exist in the database between these two cards. The RX 7600 XT has its own benchmark record, while the LX PRO has none.

The RX 7600 XT's recorded scores provide a performance profile. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2348. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 92426. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 48366. Passmark results include DirectX 10 at 85, DirectX 11 at 167, DirectX 12 at 65, DirectX 9 at 228, G2D at 1030, G3D at 17132, and GPU Compute at 8987. Its average benchmark score is 17083.

The LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0 and no individual test results. The percentile rankings reflect this disparity: the RX 7600 XT sits at the 60th percentile among all GPUs, while the LX PRO sits at the 50th percentile despite having no measured scores.

The nearest rivals for the RX 7600 XT provide context for its average score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 scores 17208, putting the RX 7600 XT 0.7% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17037, putting the RX 7600 XT 0.3% ahead. The AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019, putting the RX 7600 XT 0.4% ahead. The NVIDIA Tesla M4 scores 16932, putting the RX 7600 XT 0.9% ahead. These margins are narrow, indicating the RX 7600 XT performs in a tightly clustered band around the 17000 average score mark.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT wins in every category with recorded data. It has verified benchmark scores across ten tests, a 60th percentile ranking, and an average score of 17083. It supports Vulkan 1.4, the newer API version. It consumes less power (190 W vs 225 W), requires a smaller PSU (450 W vs 550 W), uses a simpler 8-pin connector, and is shorter (204 mm vs 248 mm). It includes an HDMI 2.1a output, which the LX PRO lacks. It has a recorded launch MSRP of 329 USD. Its predecessor and successor are known (Navi II and Navi IV respectively), and its production status is Active.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins on paper specifications. It has 50% more memory (24 GB vs 16 GB) and 50% more bandwidth (432.0 GB/s vs 288.0 GB/s). Its FP32 output is 9% higher (24.58 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS), and its FP16 output is 118% higher (49.15 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). It has three times the shading units (6144 vs 2048), 50% more TMUs (192 vs 128), and 50% more ROPs (96 vs 64). Its pixel rate is 9% higher (192.0 GPixel/s vs 176.3 GPixel/s), and its texture rate is 9% higher (384.0 GTexel/s vs 352.6 GTexel/s). It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface versus x8. It is wider (48 mm) and taller (118 mm vs 115 mm). It uses a 16-pin power connector. Its production status is also Active.

The use-case split follows the data. For applications that depend on large memory pools and high bandwidth, such as workloads with very large textures or datasets, the LX PRO's 24 GB and 432.0 GB/s provide headroom the RX 7600 XT cannot match. For applications that leverage FP16 compute, the LX PRO's 2:1 FP16 ratio delivers 49.15 TFLOPS, more than double the RX 7600 XT's 22.57 TFLOPS.

For any application where measured performance matters, the RX 7600 XT is the only card with evidence. The LX PRO's specification sheet suggests strong theoretical capability, but the database contains zero benchmark results to confirm it. The RX 7600 XT also offers a lower power draw and a smaller footprint, making it the more practical choice for constrained builds. The LX PRO's 225 W TDP and 550 W PSU requirement indicate a higher system power demand. The RX 7600 XT's Vulkan 1.4 support is a generation ahead of the LX PRO's Vulkan 1.3. The RX 7600 XT's HDMI output is an advantage for displays that rely on HDMI connectivity.