AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

CORE STATE Navi 33
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2755 MHz
TDP 190 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1755 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 96 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,348
N/A
geekbench_opencl
92,426
74,748
geekbench_vulkan
48,366
75,235
passmark_directx_10
85
79
passmark_directx_11
167
130
passmark_directx_12
65
61
passmark_directx_9
228
184
passmark_g2d
1,030
633
passmark_g3d
17,132
14,423
passmark_gpu_compute
8,987
5,947

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

The Verdict

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT serve fundamentally different roles, and the data makes that split clear. The RTX 4050 Mobile is a 50 W, integrated-class part designed for thin and light laptops. It wins only one of the nine head-to-head benchmark comparisons, but that win is decisive: a 55.6% advantage over the RX 7600 XT in Geekbench Vulkan. If your priority is Vulkan-based workloads or you need a low-power GPU that fits in an IGP slot, the NVIDIA part is the obvious choice.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT wins the other eight comparisons, often by large margins. It is a 190 W dual-slot desktop card with a 204 mm length and a 450 W suggested PSU. Its PassMark G3D score of 17132 is 15.8% ahead of the RTX 4050 Mobile's 14423. The RX 7600 XT also dominates compute and legacy DirectX workloads. Anyone building a desktop system with room for a dual-slot card and a proper power supply should pick the AMD part without hesitation.

The verdict comes down to form factor and software priorities. The RTX 4050 Mobile is for portable systems where power draw and slot width matter more than raw score. The RX 7600 XT is for desktop builders who want the higher average benchmark score and the 16 GB memory buffer. The recorded data shows the AMD card is the stronger overall performer, but the NVIDIA part has a specific Vulkan advantage that cannot be ignored.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different design philosophies. The RTX 4050 Mobile uses the AD107 chip built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. That works out to 118.9 million transistors per square millimeter. The RX 7600 XT uses the Navi 33 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process with 13,300 million transistors on a larger 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip is denser and smaller, which explains its very low 50 W TDP versus the AMD card's 190 W TDP.

The RTX 4050 Mobile packs 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs, plus 20 ray tracing cores and 80 tensor cores. It does not have a tensor core counterpart on the AMD side, as the RX 7600 XT reports null for that field. The AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 32 ray tracing cores. Despite having fewer shading units, the RX 7600 XT reaches a much higher FP32 throughput of 22.57 TFLOPS compared to 8.986 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA part. The clock speeds tell the story: the RTX 4050 Mobile boosts to 1755 MHz, while the RX 7600 XT boosts to 2755 MHz with a 2470 MHz game clock.

Memory is another major split. The RTX 4050 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both use PCIe 4.0 x8. The AMD card offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the NVIDIA part is portable device dependent for display outputs. The RX 7600 XT requires a single 8-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. The RTX 4050 Mobile has no power connectors at all and is listed as IGP slot width.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The nine recorded head-to-head comparisons show a clear pattern. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT wins eight of nine tests, with only one NVIDIA victory. The most striking result is in Geekbench Vulkan, where the RTX 4050 Mobile scores 75235 versus the RX 7600 XT's 48366. That is a 55.6% lead for NVIDIA. It is the single largest delta in either direction across the entire comparison set. For any application that relies heavily on Vulkan, this is a significant advantage.

The AMD card's wins range from modest to dominant. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 7600 XT scores 92426 against 74748 for the RTX 4050 Mobile, a 19.1% difference. PassMark G3D shows 17132 versus 14423, a 15.8% gap. The compute test is even more lopsided: PassMark GPU Compute gives the AMD card 8987 against 5947, a 33.8% lead. The 2D test shows the largest percentage gap of the AMD wins, with 1030 versus 633, a 38.5% difference.

Legacy DirectX tests all favor AMD. PassMark DirectX 9 shows 228 versus 184, a 19.3% gap. DirectX 11 shows 167 versus 130, a 22.2% gap. DirectX 10 shows 85 versus 79, a 7.1% gap. DirectX 12 is close at 65 versus 61, a 6.2% gap. The RX 7600 XT also wins the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test with a score of 2348, though no direct comparison score exists for the RTX 4050 Mobile in that test. Overall, the AMD card is ahead in every category except Vulkan, and the NVIDIA part's single win is substantial enough to matter for specific use cases.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 19049, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT averages 17083. Despite winning eight of nine head-to-head tests, the AMD card's average is lower because its Vulkan score is far below the NVIDIA part's.

Q: How do the two cards compare in ray tracing capability?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has 20 ray tracing cores, while the RX 7600 XT has 32 ray tracing cores. The AMD card also has a higher pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s versus 84.24 GPixel/s for the NVIDIA part. The recorded data does not include a dedicated ray tracing benchmark, so the advantage is structural rather than measured.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has a TDP of 50 W and requires no power connectors. The RX 7600 XT has a TDP of 190 W and needs a single 8-pin connector with a 450 W suggested PSU. This is a 140 W difference that directly impacts system cooling and power supply requirements.

Q: Which card has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4050 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD card offers both more capacity and higher bandwidth.

Q: Why does the RTX 4050 Mobile win in Vulkan despite losing elsewhere?

A: The Geekbench Vulkan score for the RTX 4050 Mobile is 75235, which is 55.6% higher than the RX 7600 XT's 48366. This is the largest single delta in the comparison set. The NVIDIA architecture appears to handle Vulkan workloads substantially better than the AMD part, despite the AMD card's overall higher raw throughput.

Q: Which card is more recent?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile was released on 2023-01-02, while the RX 7600 XT launched on 2024-01-23. The AMD card is roughly one year newer. The NVIDIA part is listed with a GeForce 50 Mobile successor, and the AMD card has a Navi IV successor.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the clear winner for desktop gaming and general compute. It leads in PassMark G3D by 15.8%, in GPU compute by 33.8%, and in OpenCL by 19.1%. The 16 GB memory buffer and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth give it a substantial advantage for memory-heavy workloads. Its 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is more than double the RTX 4050 Mobile's 8.986 TFLOPS. For DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12, the RX 7600 XT wins every test, with the largest gap being 22.2% in DirectX 11. The AMD card also wins the 2D test by 38.5%, which matters for desktop compositing and non-3D tasks. The 190 W TDP and dual-slot design mean it needs a proper case and power supply, but the benchmark data justifies that requirement.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile wins only one test, but it is a meaningful one. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 75235 versus 48366 is a 55.6% advantage. Applications that use Vulkan for rendering or compute will see a significant performance benefit on the NVIDIA part. The RTX 4050 Mobile also has a much lower power footprint at 50 W with no external power connectors, making it suitable for IGP slot installations in portable devices. Its 5 nm process and 118.9M transistors per mm² density show a more efficient design, even if the raw performance is lower. The 80 tensor cores are unique to the NVIDIA part and may benefit AI-related workloads, though no direct benchmark in the data confirms this.

For a desktop builder, the RX 7600 XT is the stronger choice across nearly every metric. For a laptop or SFF system where power and space are constrained, the RTX 4050 Mobile is the only viable option given its IGP slot width and 50 W TDP. The Vulkan advantage is a bonus for users who specifically target that API.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ on nearly every measurable specification. The RTX 4050 Mobile uses a 5 nm process with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The RX 7600 XT uses a 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. Transistor density is 118.9M per mm² for NVIDIA versus 65.2M per mm² for AMD.

Clock speeds diverge significantly. The RTX 4050 Mobile has a base clock of 1455 MHz and a boost of 1755 MHz. The RX 7600 XT has a base of 1980 MHz, a game clock of 2470 MHz, and a boost of 2755 MHz. Memory clocks differ as well: the NVIDIA part runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while the AMD card runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory capacity and bandwidth favor AMD. The RTX 4050 Mobile has 6 GB GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s. The RX 7600 XT has 16 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s. Shading units are 2560 for NVIDIA versus 2048 for AMD, but the AMD card has more TMUs (128 versus 80) and ROPs (64 versus 48). Ray tracing cores are 20 for NVIDIA and 32 for AMD. Tensor cores are 80 for NVIDIA and null for AMD.

Pixel and texture rates strongly favor AMD. The RX 7600 XT achieves 176.3 GPixel/s and 352.6 GTexel/s, compared to 84.24 GPixel/s and 140.4 GTexel/s for the RTX 4050 Mobile. FP32 and FP16 throughput are both 8.986 TFLOPS for NVIDIA and 22.57 TFLOPS for AMD.

Power and physical requirements are opposite. The RTX 4050 Mobile has a 50 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The RX 7600 XT has a 190 W TDP, dual-slot width, a single 8-pin connector, and a 450 W suggested PSU. The AMD card measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The NVIDIA part has no listed dimensions.

Display outputs differ completely. The RX 7600 XT provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The RTX 4050 Mobile is portable device dependent. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The launch MSRP for the RX 7600 XT is 329 USD, while the RTX 4050 Mobile has no listed launch MSRP. The AMD card is a desktop GPU with a fixed form factor, while the NVIDIA part is designed for integrated portable use.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 7600 XT
RTX 4050 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,048
2,560 +25.0%
Shaders
2,048
2,560 +25.0%
TMUs
128
80 -37.5%
ROPs
64
48 -25.0%
Compute Units
32
—
SM Count
—
20
Clocks
Base Clock
1980 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
2755 MHz
1755 MHz
Game Clock
2470 MHz
—
Shader Clock
2470 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
6 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
6,144 -62.5%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
96 bit
Bandwidth
288.0 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
12 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
—
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
176.3 GPixel/s
84.24 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
352.6 GTexel/s
140.4 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
22.57 TFLOPS
8.986 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
705.3 GFLOPS (1:32)
140.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
22.57 TFLOPS (1:1)
8.986 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
32
20 -37.5%
Tensor Cores
—
80
Matrix Cores
64
—
Power
TDP
190 W
50 W
TDP (W)
190
50 -73.7%
Suggested PSU
450 W
—
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Navi 33
AD107
Codename
Hotpink Bonefish
—
Generation
Navi III (RX 7000)
GeForce 40 Mobile
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
13,300 million
18,900 million
Die Size
204 mm²
159 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
65.2M / mm²
118.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
—
8.9
Shader Model
6.9
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Length
204 mm 8 inches
—
Height
115 mm 4.5 inches
—
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
329 USD
—
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Navi II
GeForce 30 Mobile
Successor
Navi IV
GeForce 50 Mobile
View Radeon RX 7600 XT Details View GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Details