AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon RX 7600 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. However, the recorded data for each card allows for a comparative analysis based on their individual performance metrics and specification-derived capabilities.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has a substantial set of measured scores. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result is 2310. In Geekbench, it scores 88051 for OpenCL and 34401 for Vulkan. Passmark results include 84 for DirectX 10, 172 for DirectX 11, 58 for DirectX 12, 226 for DirectX 9, 984 for G2D, 16634 for G3D, and 8790 for GPU compute. Its average benchmark score is 15171, placing it at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals confirm its positioning: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199 (a delta of -0.2% relative to the RX 7600), the AMD Radeon Pro 560X scores 15082 (delta of 0.6%), the AMD Radeon 680M scores 15270 (delta of -0.7%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 15063 (delta of 0.7%). These deltas show the RX 7600 sits within a tight performance band, with the largest measured gap being only 0.7%.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it has no nearest rivals. This absence of measured data means no direct score comparison is possible. However, the LX PRO carries a 50th percentile placement among all GPUs, a figure that appears to be a baseline rather than a measured result. The practical comparison must therefore rely on architectural and specification data, which the recorded information does provide in detail.

Architecture Differences

The two cards use fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0, using the Navi 33 chip with the codename "Hotpink Bonefish". It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation and is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the "TrueGPU" architecture with the 7G105 chip, belongs to the 7G100 generation, and is also fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown.

The RX 7600 has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It includes 32 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. Its FP32 throughput is 21.75 TFLOPS, and its FP16 throughput is also 21.75 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s. The LX PRO features a substantially larger compute configuration: 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. It lists no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. Its FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS, and its FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS, showing a 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s.

Memory configurations differ significantly. The RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with the same memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) but bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The larger bus width and capacity give the LX PRO a clear memory advantage.

Clock behavior also differs. The RX 7600 has recorded base, boost, and game clocks: 1720 MHz base, 2655 MHz boost, and 2250 MHz game clock. The LX PRO has no base, boost, or game clock listed in the database, only the memory clock. Power and interface specifications also differ: the RX 7600 has a TDP of 165 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, requires a suggested 450 W PSU, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, requires a suggested 550 W PSU, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. The RX 7600 measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height, while the LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

API support is similar with one notable difference. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs differ: the RX 7600 offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the LX PRO offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Both cards are dual-slot designs and both are listed as Active in production status. The RX 7600 has a release date of 2023-05-24, while the LX PRO has a release date of 2026-03-16. The RX 7600 lists a predecessor (Navi II) and successor (Navi IV), while the LX PRO has neither.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded specification data, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO holds advantages in several compute and memory dimensions. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is approximately 13% higher than the RX 7600's 21.75 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is more pronounced: the LX PRO's 49.15 TFLOPS is more than double the RX 7600's 21.75 TFLOPS, benefiting from its 2:1 FP16 ratio. Texture rate favors the LX PRO at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 339.8 GTexel/s, and pixel rate favors it as well at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 169.9 GPixel/s. The LX PRO also has three times the shading units (6144 versus 2048), 50% more TMUs (192 versus 128), and 50% more ROPs (96 versus 64). Its memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s exceeds the RX 7600's 288.0 GB/s by 50%, and its 24 GB capacity triples the 8 GB on the RX 7600. The LX PRO also offers a wider PCIe interface (x16 versus x8) and more display outputs (4 versus 3, though with an older DisplayPort version).

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 holds advantages in measured performance data and efficiency-related specifications. It has a complete set of benchmark scores, all of which contribute to its 57th percentile ranking, while the LX PRO has no measured scores and sits at the 50th percentile baseline. The RX 7600 has a lower TDP of 165 W compared to 225 W, and it supports a newer Vulkan version (1.4 versus 1.3). It also includes ray tracing cores (32 of them), which the LX PRO does not list. The RX 7600's boost clock of 2655 MHz provides a defined frequency ceiling, whereas the LX PRO has no recorded boost clock. The RX 7600 also has a smaller physical footprint, with a length of 204 mm versus 248 mm and a height of 115 mm versus 118 mm.

The absence of measured benchmarks for the LX PRO means its wins are theoretical and derived from architectural specifications. The RX 7600's wins are empirical, drawn from actual test results. This distinction matters for interpretation: specification advantages do not guarantee benchmark outcomes, and the database currently offers no recorded data to confirm the LX PRO's real-world performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has an average benchmark score of 15171, placing it at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmarks, and sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: The RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both use memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Which card has higher compute throughput?

A: The LX PRO has higher FP32 throughput at 24.58 TFLOPS versus 21.75 TFLOPS for the RX 7600. For FP16, the LX PRO delivers 49.15 TFLOPS, while the RX 7600 delivers 21.75 TFLOPS.

Q: Does the RX 7600 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 7600 includes 32 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO does not list any ray tracing cores in its recorded specifications.

Q: What is the TDP of each card?

A: The RX 7600 has a TDP of 165 W with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: What are the closest rivals to the RX 7600?

A: The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM with an average score of 15199 (delta of -0.2%), the AMD Radeon 680M with 15270 (delta of -0.7%), the AMD Radeon Pro 560X with 15082 (delta of 0.6%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti with 15063 (delta of 0.7%).

The Verdict

The data presents an asymmetric comparison. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is a fully measured product with 10 recorded benchmark scores, a 57th percentile placement, and a launch MSRP of 269 USD. Its performance profile is well established, and its nearest rivals all fall within a 0.7% delta band, indicating a stable, predictable position in the market. It delivers 21.75 TFLOPS FP32, includes 32 ray tracing cores, supports Vulkan 1.4, and operates at 165 W TDP.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a specification-heavy card with no recorded benchmark results. Its architecture details suggest a higher theoretical ceiling: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, 24 GB of GDDR6, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, 6144 shading units, and a 192-bit bus. These are substantial advantages on paper. However, the database contains no measured scores to validate these specifications in practice. The 50th percentile placement cannot be treated as a tested result, and the lack of nearest rivals means no comparative anchor exists.

For users who prioritize measured, verified performance, the RX 7600 is the only card with empirical data supporting its position. Its benchmark scores are consistent, its rival deltas are minimal, and its feature set includes ray tracing and a newer Vulkan revision. For users who prioritize raw specification advantages, the LX PRO offers a larger memory pool, higher bandwidth, more compute units, and higher throughput figures. The choice depends on whether one trusts recorded measurements or listed specifications, and the database currently offers no benchmark results to bridge that gap.