AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head dataset spans nine tests, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins eight of them. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 takes only one, and by a razor-thin margin. In PassMark G2D, the AMD card scores 984 against 981 for the NVIDIA part, a 0.3% edge. That is the sole victory for the desktop Radeon.

The largest margin belongs to GeekBench Vulkan. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile posts 139213, while the RX 7600 manages 34401. That is a 75.3% deficit for the AMD card. The gap is decisive and suggests a substantial difference in modern API workload handling. DirectX 12 results follow a similar pattern, with the NVIDIA part scoring 102 against 58, a 43.1% advantage. DirectX 11 shows the NVIDIA card at 237 versus 172, a 27.4% lead. Even legacy DirectX 9 favors the mobile part: 259 versus 226, a 12.7% difference.

Compute performance tells a more nuanced story. In PassMark GPU Compute, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 10101 against 8790 for the RX 7600, a 13% lead. That is the closest NVIDIA win outside of the G2D result. The OpenCL benchmark shows a larger gap: 143870 versus 88051, a 38.8% advantage for the NVIDIA part. The average benchmark score for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 35435, while the RX 7600 sits at 15171. The NVIDIA card also holds the 80th percentile among all GPUs in the database, compared to the 57th percentile for the AMD card.

PassMark G3D, a common gaming-oriented aggregate, puts the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile at 24004 and the RX 7600 at 16634, a 30.7% gap. The nearest rivals for each card reinforce the separation. The RX 7600 trades blows with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (0.2% behind), the AMD Radeon 680M (0.7% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro 560X (0.6% ahead), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti (0.7% ahead). The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits near the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 (0.2% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro Duo (1.2% behind), the NVIDIA A2 (2.1% ahead), and the NVIDIA T1000 (2.4% behind). In short, the two cards occupy entirely different performance tiers.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and target different form factors. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip built on Blackwell 2.0, part of the GeForce 50 Mobile generation. The process nodes differ: AMD uses TSMC at 6 nm, while NVIDIA uses TSMC at 5 nm. Transistor counts diverge sharply. The Navi 33 packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a density of 65.2M per mm². The GB205 contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, for a density of 118.3M per mm².

Core configurations also differ substantially. The RX 7600 has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. It has no tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 46 ray tracing cores, and 184 tensor cores. Clock behavior is inverted in an interesting way. The AMD card runs a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2655 MHz, with a game clock of 2250 MHz. The NVIDIA card has a base clock of 847 MHz and a boost clock of 1447 MHz, with no game clock listed. Despite lower clocks, the NVIDIA part wins nearly every benchmark.

Memory subsystems differ as well. The RX 7600 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s and memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192 bit bus, with a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s and memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The NVIDIA card has more than double the memory bandwidth.

Pixel and texture rates tell a mixed story. The RX 7600 achieves 169.9 GPixel/s and 339.8 GTexel/s. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile achieves 115.8 GPixel/s and 266.2 GTexel/s. The AMD card leads in both raw fill rates, which aligns with its higher clock speeds. FP32 and FP16 performance also favor AMD on paper: 21.75 TFLOPS for both precisions on the RX 7600, versus 17.04 TFLOPS for both on the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. Yet the benchmark results show the NVIDIA part winning in practice, suggesting that raw shader throughput is not the deciding factor.

Power and physical design differ by intent. The RX 7600 is a dual-slot desktop card with a 165 W TDP, a single 8-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 450 W. It measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is an IGP class part with a 60 W TDP, no power connectors, and portable-device-dependent display outputs. It has no listed dimensions. The RX 7600 uses PCIe 4.0 x8; the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16. API support matches: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Release timing differs by nearly two years. The RX 7600 launched on 2023-05-24 with a launch MSRP of 269 USD. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile launched on 2025-02-28 with no launch MSRP listed. The AMD card has a predecessor in Navi II and a successor in Navi IV. The NVIDIA card lists GeForce 40 Mobile as its predecessor and no successor. Both are marked as active in production.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins more head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins 8 of 9 tests. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 wins only PassMark G2D, by 0.3%.

Q: How large is the performance gap in DirectX 12?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 102 in PassMark DirectX 12, while the RX 7600 scores 58. That is a 43.1% advantage for the NVIDIA part.

Q: Does the RX 7600 lead in any performance metric?

A: Yes. It leads in PassMark G2D (984 versus 981) and in raw fill rates, with 169.9 GPixel/s versus 115.8 GPixel/s and 339.8 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s for the NVIDIA card.

Q: What are the memory capacity and bandwidth differences?

A: The RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192 bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The RX 7600 has a 165 W TDP, uses a single 8-pin connector, and suggests a 450 W PSU. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a 60 W TDP and no power connectors.

Q: Which card has more shading units and ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5888 shading units and 46 ray tracing cores. The RX 7600 has 2048 shading units and 32 ray tracing cores.

The Verdict

The data separates these two GPUs into distinct tiers. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile dominates the benchmark suite, winning 8 of 9 tests with margins ranging from 12.7% in DirectX 9 to 75.3% in GeekBench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score of 35435 places it near the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 and AMD Radeon Pro Duo. Its 80th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms a high-end position in the database.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 occupies a lower tier. Its average benchmark score of 15171 puts it in the company of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and the AMD Radeon 680M. Its 57th percentile ranking shows a mid-pack position. The only test it wins, PassMark G2D, measures 2D graphics performance and carries a 0.3% margin, effectively a tie.

The pick depends on the use case. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the stronger choice for compute-heavy workloads, modern DirectX 12 titles, and Vulkan applications, given its large leads in GeekBench Vulkan (75.3%), OpenCL (38.8%), and DirectX 12 (43.1%). The RX 7600 offers higher raw fill rates and a higher boost clock, but those advantages do not translate into benchmark wins. For users prioritizing 2D desktop performance, the RX 7600 is technically ahead, but the margin is negligible. For nearly every measurable 3D or compute task, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the superior part.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | GB205 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 31,100 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 263 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 118.3M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1720 MHz | 847 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz | 1447 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 5888 |

| TMUs | 128 | 184 |

| ROPs | 64 | 80 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 46 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 184 |

| Pixel Rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 115.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 339.8 GTexel/s | 266.2 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 21.75 TFLOPS | 17.04 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 165 W | 60 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | Not listed |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Release Date | 2023-05-24 | 2025-02-28 |

| Launch MSRP | 269 USD | Not listed |

| Predecessor | Navi II | GeForce 40 Mobile |

| Successor | Navi IV | Not listed |

| Average Benchmark Score | 15171 | 35435 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 57 | 80 |