AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs Intel Arc B770 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for these two GPUs is asymmetric. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has a full set of benchmark results across multiple test suites, while the Intel Arc B770 has no benchmark scores recorded in the database at all. This makes a direct score-by-score comparison impossible. However, the available data still provides a clear picture of where each card stands relative to the broader GPU landscape.

The RX 7600 posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310. In Geekbench OpenCL, it reaches 88051 points, while its Geekbench Vulkan result is 34401. The Passmark suite shows the card scoring 84 in DirectX 10, 172 in DirectX 11, 58 in DirectX 12, and 226 in DirectX 9. Its Passmark G2D score is 984, and the G3D score is 16634. GPU compute on Passmark comes in at 8790.

The RX 7600's average benchmark score is 15171, which places it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, are tightly clustered. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199, which is 0.2% higher than the RX 7600. The AMD Radeon 680M scores 15270, 0.7% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X scores 15082, 0.6% lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 15063, 0.7% lower. This grouping shows the RX 7600 sitting in a narrow performance band, within roughly one percentage point of four other cards in either direction.

The Intel Arc B770 has no recorded benchmark scores, a 50th percentile placement, and an average benchmark score of 0. Without head-to-head tests or individual results, there is no numerical basis to claim either card wins any specific test. The wins counters for both cards are 0.

What the data does show is that the RX 7600 is a measurable, benchmarked product with a clear performance profile. The Arc B770 is effectively an unknown quantity in this database, with no test results to compare. Any assessment of the Intel card must rely on its architectural specifications rather than measured performance.

The Verdict

From the data alone, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the only card with verified performance numbers. Its average benchmark score of 15171 and 57th percentile placement indicate a solid mid-range GPU that trades blows with cards like the RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon 680M. The RX 7600 is within 0.7% of the GTX 660 Ti and Radeon Pro 560X, and within 0.2% to 0.7% of the RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon 680M. This suggests a GPU that will perform similarly to those rivals in real-world workloads.

The Intel Arc B770, with no benchmark scores, cannot be recommended on the basis of measured performance. Its 50th percentile placement is a placeholder at best, and an average score of 0 means the database has no evidence of its capabilities.

For a builder who needs a card with confirmed performance data, the RX 7600 is the defensible choice. It has a complete benchmark profile across DirectX 9, 10, 11, 12, Vulkan, OpenCL, and compute workloads. The Arc B770 may have architectural advantages on paper, including a larger memory pool and wider bus, but without test results, those advantages remain theoretical.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and use different process nodes. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 uses the Navi 33 chip based on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation and is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. Its predecessor is Navi II and its successor is Navi IV.

The Intel Arc B770 uses the BMG-G31 chip based on Xe2-HPG architecture, belonging to the Battlemage (Arc 7) generation. It is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, a smaller node than the RX 7600's 6 nm. The die size is 368 mm², which is substantially larger than the RX 7600's 204 mm². Intel does not list a transistor count, transistor density, or codename for this chip. Its predecessor is Alchemist, and it has no recorded successor.

The RX 7600 has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It includes 32 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The Arc B770 doubles the shading units to 4096, doubles TMUs to 256, and doubles ROPs to 128. It also has 32 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The RX 7600 has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2655 MHz, and a game clock of 2250 MHz. Its memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Arc B770 has a higher base clock of 2100 MHz but a lower boost clock of 2400 MHz. It has no game clock listed. Its memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Compute throughput shows an interesting split. The RX 7600 delivers 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 and 21.75 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The Arc B770 delivers 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32, which is lower than the RX 7600, but 39.32 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, which is nearly double the RX 7600's FP16 output. Pixel rates are 169.9 GPixel/s for the RX 7600 and 307.2 GPixel/s for the Arc B770. Texture rates are 339.8 GTexel/s for the RX 7600 and 614.4 GTexel/s for the Arc B770. The Intel card has a clear advantage in both pixel and texture throughput.

Memory configurations are also very different. The RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc B770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That is double the capacity, double the bus width, and 77.8% more bandwidth for the Intel card.

Power requirements differ as well. The RX 7600 has a TDP of 165 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Arc B770 has a TDP of 225 W, uses one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has an average benchmark score of 15171. The Intel Arc B770 has an average benchmark score of 0 because no benchmark results are recorded in the database.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc B770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 and FP16 compute figures?

A: The RX 7600 delivers 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 and 21.75 TFLOPS FP16. The Arc B770 delivers 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.32 TFLOPS FP16.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The Intel Arc B770 has 4096 shading units, double the RX 7600's 2048 shading units. The Arc B770 also has 256 TMUs and 128 ROPs, compared to 128 TMUs and 64 ROPs on the RX 7600.

Q: What process nodes are used?

A: The RX 7600 uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Arc B770 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC. The RX 7600's die is 204 mm² with 13,300 million transistors, and the Arc B770's die is 368 mm² with an unknown transistor count.

Q: What is the power draw and PSU requirement?

A: The RX 7600 has a TDP of 165 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Arc B770 has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 wins in every category where measured performance exists. It has a complete set of benchmark scores, an average score of 15171, and a 57th percentile placement. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051 are concrete data points. It also wins on FP32 compute, delivering 21.75 TFLOPS versus the Arc B770's 19.66 TFLOPS. The RX 7600 has a higher boost clock at 2655 MHz versus 2400 MHz, and a higher memory clock at 2250 MHz versus 2000 MHz. It also has a lower TDP of 165 W versus 225 W, requiring only a 450 W PSU instead of 550 W. Its launch MSRP is 269 USD.

The Intel Arc B770 wins on raw specifications in several areas. It has double the shading units (4096 vs 2048), double the TMUs (256 vs 128), and double the ROPs (128 vs 64). Its memory subsystem is far larger: 16 GB versus 8 GB, 256-bit bus versus 128-bit, and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 288.0 GB/s. Its FP16 compute of 39.32 TFLOPS is nearly double the RX 7600's 21.75 TFLOPS. Pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s versus 169.9 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s versus 339.8 GTexel/s. The Arc B770 also uses a smaller 5 nm process node versus 6 nm, and has a higher base clock of 2100 MHz versus 1720 MHz. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RX 7600 uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The Arc B770's die is 368 mm², larger than the RX 7600's 204 mm².

For a builder prioritizing verified performance, the RX 7600 is the only card with evidence of how it actually runs. For a builder prioritizing memory capacity, bandwidth, and raw shading throughput, the Arc B770 has the specification advantage. The Arc B770's 16 GB memory pool and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are particularly relevant for workloads that exceed 8 GB, such as high-resolution textures or large compute datasets. Its FP16 performance is also substantially higher, which may benefit certain compute tasks.

The RX 7600 is the lighter card, with a 165 W TDP and a single 8-pin connector. The Arc B770 needs a 550 W PSU and two connectors. The RX 7600 is also shorter at 204 mm versus no listed length for the Arc B770. Both cards are dual-slot and share the same display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600 | Intel Arc B770 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | BMG-G31 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe2-HPG |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 368 mm² |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | unknown |

| Base Clock | 1720 MHz | 2100 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Game Clock | 2250 MHz | not listed |

| Memory Clock | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 4096 |

| TMUs | 128 | 256 |

| ROPs | 64 | 128 |

| RT Cores | 32 | 32 |

| Pixel Rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 307.2 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 339.8 GTexel/s | 614.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 21.75 TFLOPS | 19.66 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 165 W | 225 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Length | 204 mm | not listed |

| Release Date | 2023-05-24 | 2025-12-31 |

| Launch MSRP | 269 USD | not listed |

| Predecessor | Navi II | Alchemist |

| Successor | Navi IV | not listed |