AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs AMD Radeon Vega 11 Comparison

# AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs AMD Radeon Vega 11

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 and AMD Radeon Vega 11 occupy vastly different segments of the GPU spectrum, yet both carry the AMD badge. The RX 7600 is a modern discrete graphics card built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the Vega 11 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) from the GCN 5.0 era, designed for APUs. The benchmark data reveals a decisive performance gap, but the comparison is nuanced by their respective roles, power envelopes, and architectural philosophies.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in the available head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 wins both head-to-head tests. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 88051 against the Vega 11's 13392, a 557.5% advantage. In Geekbench Vulkan, the RX 7600 scores 34401 versus 12273, a 180.3% lead.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The RX 7600 has an average benchmark score of 15171, while the Vega 11 averages 14352. This places the RX 7600 at the 57th percentile of all GPUs and the Vega 11 at the 56th percentile, meaning they sit very close in the overall distribution despite the massive head-to-head deltas.

Q: What are the closest rivals to each GPU according to the data?

A: The RX 7600's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM with an average score of 15199 (a -0.2% delta), followed by the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270 (-0.7%). The Vega 11's closest competitor is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 at 14385 (-0.2% delta), with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN at 14373 (-0.1%) close behind.

Q: What is the architectural generation gap between these two?

A: The RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 with a 6 nm process at TSMC, part of the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. The Vega 11 uses GCN 5.0 on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries, belonging to the Vega IGP (Picasso) generation. The RX 7600 was released on 2023-05-24, while the Vega 11 launched on 2019-09-29.

Q: How do their memory configurations differ?

A: The RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Vega 11 uses System Shared memory, with its bus width and bandwidth both listed as System Dependent, meaning they vary based on the host system's RAM.

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The RX 7600 has a TDP of 165 W and requires a 1x 8-pin power connector with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Vega 11 has a TDP of just 15 W, uses no power connectors, and is an IGP, meaning it draws power through the motherboard.

Architecture Differences

The architectural chasm between these two GPUs is stark. The RX 7600 employs the RDNA 3.0 architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process, packing 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². In contrast, the Vega 11 uses the older GCN 5.0 architecture on a 12 nm GlobalFoundries process, with 4,940 million transistors spread across a larger 210 mm² die, resulting in a much lower density of 23.5M per mm².

The compute resources diverge dramatically. The RX 7600 features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 raster operation units (ROPs). It also includes 32 dedicated ray tracing cores, a feature entirely absent from the Vega 11. The Vega 11, by comparison, has only 704 shading units, 44 TMUs, and 8 ROPs, with no ray tracing capability at all.

Clock speeds tell a similar story. The RX 7600 has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2250 MHz, and a boost clock of 2655 MHz. The Vega 11 starts at a mere 300 MHz base and boosts to 1400 MHz. Memory clocks also differ: the RX 7600 runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) on its GDDR6, while the Vega 11's memory clock is system-dependent.

The API support reflects their respective eras. The RX 7600 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Vega 11 is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.3. Both support OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600's output capabilities include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, whereas the Vega 11's display outputs are motherboard-dependent.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data contains two benchmarks, and the RX 7600 wins both decisively. The most dramatic result comes from Geekbench OpenCL, where the RX 7600 scores 88051 against the Vega 11's 13392. This represents a 557.5% advantage, meaning the RX 7600 delivers more than six and a half times the OpenCL performance. This massive gap is a direct consequence of the architectural and hardware differences: the RX 7600 has nearly three times the shading units, over twice the TMUs, eight times the ROPs, and significantly higher clock speeds across the board.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the margin narrows but remains overwhelming. The RX 7600 scores 34401, while the Vega 11 manages 12273, a 180.3% delta. The smaller relative gap in Vulkan compared to OpenCL suggests that the Vega 11's GCN architecture handles Vulkan workloads somewhat more efficiently relative to its raw specs, though it still trails by a substantial margin. The RX 7600's modern RDNA 3.0 design, with its dedicated ray tracing cores and newer API support, likely contributes to its stronger Vulkan showing.

Contextualizing these results through the nearestRivals data adds perspective. The RX 7600's average benchmark score of 15171 places it just 0.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15199) and 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon 680M (15270). Meanwhile, the Vega 11's average of 14352 sits 0.1% below the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN (14373) and 0.2% below the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 (14385). Despite the massive head-to-head deltas, both GPUs occupy similar percentiles overall (57th for RX 7600, 56th for Vega 11), indicating that the Vega 11's integrated nature still competes with older discrete GPUs in the broader benchmark distribution.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the far superior performer. Anyone seeking discrete-class gaming or compute performance should choose the RX 7600 without hesitation. Its 557.5% OpenCL lead and 180.3% Vulkan lead over the Vega 11 translate to real-world differences in frame rates, rendering times, and compute workloads. The RX 7600's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 32 ray tracing cores make it a capable modern GPU, while the Vega 11's 1.971 TFLOPS FP32 and system-shared memory limit it to basic tasks.

However, the Vega 11 has its own niche. As an IGP with a 15 W TDP, it requires no power connectors and produces no dedicated cooling demands, making it suitable for low-power office PCs or HTPCs where discrete graphics are impractical. Its 56th percentile ranking shows it still outperforms many older discrete GPUs, and its 12 nm process with 4,940 million transistors in a 210 mm² die represents a reasonable efficiency for its era. For users with such systems, the Vega 11 provides adequate graphics for everyday computing and light gaming, but the benchmark results make clear it cannot compete with the RX 7600 in any demanding scenario.

The choice ultimately depends on the use case. For gaming, content creation, or any GPU-accelerated workload, the RX 7600 is the only rational pick. For ultra-low-power integrated graphics where upgradeability is not an option, the Vega 11 remains a functional, if dated, solution.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two GPUs:

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600 | AMD Radeon Vega 11 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 5.0 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 4,940 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 210 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 23.5M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1720 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz | 1400 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 704 |

| TMUs | 128 | 44 |

| ROPs | 64 | 8 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 11.20 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 339.8 GTexel/s | 61.60 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | 1.971 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 3.942 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 165 W | 15 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | IGP |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2023-05-24 | 2019-09-29 |

| Predecessor | Navi II | GCN 3.0 IGP |

| Successor | Navi IV | Vega II IGP |