AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 completely outclasses the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 in every measurable benchmark, with the data showing a 603% lead in Geekbench OpenCL and a 154% lead in Geekbench Vulkan. This is not a close contest; it is a generational and architectural chasm where the discrete RDNA 3.0 card delivers scores that the Vega IGP cannot approach. The RX 7600's average benchmark score of 15,171 places it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs, while the RX Vega 11's 14,385 average places it in the 56th percentile, but those aggregate figures obscure the fact that the RX 7600 wins both head-to-head tests outright.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Geekbench OpenCL result is the most lopsided metric in this comparison. The RX 7600 scores 88,051 points, while the RX Vega 11 manages just 12,525 points—a delta of 603% in favor of the RX 7600. This means the discrete card delivers over seven times the compute throughput in this API, reflecting the massive gap in shading units (2,048 vs. 704) and raw FP32 performance (21.75 TFLOPS vs. 1.971 TFLOPS). For any workload that leverages OpenCL—be it rendering, physics simulation, or GPGPU tasks—the RX 7600 is categorically in a different league; the Vega 11's score is closer to a modern integrated graphics baseline than to a dedicated gaming card.

The Geekbench Vulkan result is less extreme but still decisively one-sided. The RX 7600 posts 34,401 points against the Vega 11's 13,543 points, a 154% advantage. Vulkan is a lower-level API that often exposes architectural efficiency, and here the RX 7600's RDNA 3.0 design with dedicated ray accelerators shows its strength. The Vega 11, built on GCN 5.0, lacks any ray tracing hardware and its 8 ROPs are a severe bottleneck for rasterization-heavy tasks. While the RX 7600's 154% lead is smaller than its OpenCL margin, it still represents a more than doubling of performance, ensuring that modern Vulkan-based titles will run at playable frame rates on the RX 7600 while the Vega 11 struggles with even basic 3D scenes.

The head-to-head record is 2 wins for the RX 7600 and 0 for the RX Vega 11. There is no benchmark in the data where the Vega 11 scores higher, and its nearest rival list—which includes the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN (delta 0.1%) and the Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics (delta 0.5%)—shows it competing with decade-old discrete GPUs and low-power mobile parts. In contrast, the RX 7600's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (delta -0.2%) and the AMD Radeon 680M (delta -0.7%), placing it in the company of modern entry-level discrete cards. The deltaPct values confirm the RX 7600 is marginally faster than the RTX 3050 OEM and the Radeon 680M, while the Vega 11 sits in a performance tier that is simply not comparable.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the RX Vega 11 uses the GCN 5.0 architecture on a 12 nm process from GlobalFoundries. This process shrink alone explains a significant portion of the performance gap—the RX 7600 packs 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm², whereas the Vega 11's Picasso chip contains only 4,940 million transistors across a 210 mm² die, with a density of 23.5M per mm². The RX 7600's die is slightly smaller but holds nearly three times the transistors, a direct consequence of the more advanced node.

Core configuration differs massively. The RX 7600 features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 raster operation pipelines (ROPs), along with 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. The RX Vega 11 has 704 shading units, 44 TMUs, and just 8 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores at all. Pixel and texture rates reflect this: the RX 7600 achieves 169.9 GPixel/s and 339.8 GTexel/s, while the Vega 11 manages only 11.20 GPixel/s and 61.60 GTexel/s. The RX 7600 is 15 times faster in pixel fill and 5.5 times faster in texture fill, which directly translates to higher resolution and detail settings in games.

Memory is another fundamental divergence. The RX 7600 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX Vega 11 relies on system shared memory, with its bandwidth listed as "System Dependent"—meaning performance scales with the host system's RAM speed and configuration. This makes the Vega 11 highly variable in real-world performance, whereas the RX 7600 has a fixed, dedicated memory pool that does not compete with the CPU for bandwidth. Clock speeds also favor the RX 7600: its base clock is 1720 MHz, boosting to 2655 MHz, while the Vega 11 runs at a 300 MHz base and 1400 MHz boost—the latter is a typical power-saving IGP clock, but the former is severely constrained to fit within a 15 W TDP.

The RX 7600 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Vega 11 only reaches DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.3. The RX 7600 also has a 165 W TDP and requires a 1x 8-pin power connector with a 450 W suggested PSU, whereas the Vega 11 is an IGP with a 15 W TDP and no power connectors. The RX 7600 is a dual-slot card measuring 204 mm in length, while the Vega 11 is integrated into the motherboard with no physical dimensions listed.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600 wins every scenario where dedicated graphics performance matters. Its 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, especially with ray tracing enabled thanks to its 32 RT cores. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,310 indicates strong modern API performance, and the PassMark G3D score of 16,634 places it in the upper echelon of entry-level discrete GPUs. For users running compute-heavy applications like video encoding, 3D rendering, or machine learning inference, the RX 7600's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 8,790 PassMark GPU compute score are decisive advantages.

The RX Vega 11 has no benchmark wins to claim. Its only advantages are qualitative: it is an integrated solution with a 15 W TDP, requiring no power connectors and fitting in any motherboard with the appropriate APU socket. It consumes roughly one-tenth the power of the RX 7600 (15 W vs. 165 W), making it suitable for ultra-low-power builds, HTPCs, or office machines where gaming is not a priority. Its Geekbench Metal score of 17,086 is its only distinct benchmark entry, but that API is not tested on the RX 7600, so no direct comparison exists. The Vega 11's 56th percentile ranking and average score of 14,385 are driven entirely by its three Geekbench results (OpenCL, Vulkan, and Metal), which are all far below the RX 7600's equivalent scores.

For users who need a GPU for legacy DX9, DX10, or DX11 titles, the RX 7600 still wins—its PassMark DX9 score of 226, DX10 score of 84, and DX11 score of 172 are all higher than anything the Vega 11 can produce, though the Vega 11 does not have corresponding PassMark scores in the data. The only scenario where the Vega 11 might be preferable is a system where the 15 W power draw and IGP form factor are mandatory, such as a passively cooled build or a server with no PCIe slot available. Even then, its performance is so limited that it cannot handle modern 3D workloads.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the AMD Radeon RX 7600 in OpenCL?

A: The RX 7600 scores 88,051 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 603% higher than the RX Vega 11's 12,525 points.

Q: Does the RX Vega 11 have any ray tracing capability?

A: No. The RX Vega 11 has no ray tracing cores listed in its specifications, while the RX 7600 includes 32 dedicated RT cores.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two?

A: The RX 7600 has 288.0 GB/s of dedicated GDDR6 bandwidth on a 128-bit bus. The RX Vega 11 uses system shared memory, with bandwidth described as "System Dependent."

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor density?

A: The RX 7600's 6 nm process yields 65.2M transistors per mm², compared to the RX Vega 11's 23.5M per mm² on a 12 nm node.

Q: Can the RX Vega 11 run modern Vulkan games?

A: It supports Vulkan 1.3, but its Geekbench Vulkan score of 13,543 is 154% lower than the RX 7600's 34,401, indicating it will struggle with demanding titles.

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The RX 7600 has a 165 W TDP and requires a 450 W power supply, while the RX Vega 11 has a 15 W TDP and uses no power connectors.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the superior product by every quantitative measure available. It wins 2 out of 2 head-to-head benchmarks, with deltas of 603% and 154% in OpenCL and Vulkan respectively. Its average benchmark score of 15,171 is 5.5% higher than the Vega 11's 14,385, and its nearest rivals include the RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon 680M, while the Vega 11's rivals are the GTX TITAN and GTX 965M. The RX 7600 offers 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, 32 RT cores, and a 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 throughput—features that are entirely absent from the Vega 11.

The only reason to choose the RX Vega 11 is if the system absolutely requires a 15 W IGP with no external power and no PCIe slot. That is an edge case for embedded or ultra-low-power builds. For any gaming, rendering, or compute workload, the RX 7600 is the only rational choice, and its 57th percentile ranking confirms it as a competent entry-level discrete GPU. The RX Vega 11 is end-of-life and its 56th percentile is misleading, as it is buoyed by a single Metal score that does not apply to the RX 7600. If you have the motherboard support and power budget, the RX 7600 is the definitive performer.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 5.0 |

| Process Node | 6 nm (TSMC) | 12 nm (GlobalFoundries) |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 4,940 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 210 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 23.5M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1720 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz | 1400 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus | 128 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 704 |

| TMUs | 128 | 44 |

| ROPs | 64 | 8 |

| RT Cores | 32 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 11.20 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 339.8 GTexel/s | 61.60 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | 1.971 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 3.942 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 165 W | 15 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | IGP |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2023-05-24 | 2019-07-06 |