AMD Radeon RX 7400 vs Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data places the AMD Radeon RX 7400 and the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile in very different performance tiers. The AMD part has eight benchmark entries in the database, while the Intel part has none. This absence of recorded scores for the Intel GPU means the comparison relies on architectural specifications and the AMD card’s measured results against its nearest rivals.

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 delivers an average benchmark score of 2467 across all recorded tests. Its percentile ranking against all GPUs sits at 17, meaning it outperforms roughly 17 percent of the installed GPU population in the database. The nearest rival in the database is the AMD Radeon 8040S with an average score of 2440, placing the RX 7400 1.1 percent ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce 710M follows at 2433, trailing by 1.4 percent. The Intel HD Graphics 610 scores 2425, a 1.8 percent deficit, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M lands at 2422, 1.9 percent behind.

Looking at individual benchmark tests for the RX 7400, the strongest result appears in Passmark G3D with a score of 11897. The Passmark G2D test returns 1209, while Passmark DirectX 9 yields 176. The DirectX 11 test produces 97, and the DirectX 10 test gives 59. The DirectX 12 result is 44, and the GPU compute score reaches 5152. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test records 1103.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has no benchmark entries, so its average score is recorded as zero. Its percentile ranking is 50, which in the database indicates a mid-pack position relative to all GPUs, but this figure derives from the absence of measured data rather than from actual performance results. The Intel part’s nearest rival list is empty, confirming that no comparable scores exist in the database for this GPU.

The head-to-head benchmark array between the two parts is empty. Neither part has a recorded win count in direct comparisons. The data therefore cannot support a direct score-to-score comparison. What the database does provide is a full specification sheet for both GPUs, allowing a structural analysis of their capabilities.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 wins in every category where measured performance exists. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. This means the AMD card has dedicated, high-speed memory, while the Intel GPU relies on the host system’s RAM and memory controller. In memory-intensive workloads, the AMD part’s dedicated bandwidth provides a clear structural advantage.

Compute throughput separates the two GPUs substantially. The RX 7400 reaches 16.49 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The Intel part delivers 1,280.0 GFLOPS, which is 1.28 TFLOPS. The AMD GPU offers more than twelve times the single-precision floating-point throughput. In FP16, the AMD part reaches 32.97 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the Intel GPU produces 2.560 TFLOPS under the same ratio. This gap affects any workload relying on shader compute, physics simulation, or general GPGPU tasks.

Pixel and texture throughput follow the same pattern. The RX 7400 sustains 147.2 GPixel/s and 257.6 GTexel/s. The Intel part manages 20.00 GPixel/s and 40.00 GTexel/s. The AMD card has roughly seven times the pixel fill rate and more than six times the texture fill rate. Rasterization-heavy scenes, especially at higher resolutions, favor the AMD GPU heavily.

The AMD GPU also has more execution resources. It contains 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Intel GPU has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and 2 ray tracing cores. The RX 7400 has seven times the shading units, seven times the TMUs, eight times the ROPs, and fourteen times the ray tracing cores. Ray-traced workloads, where present, will see a massive disparity.

The AMD part’s boost clock reaches 2300 MHz, with a game clock of 2200 MHz and a base clock of 1452 MHz. The Intel part boosts to 2500 MHz but has a base clock of only 300 MHz. The higher boost clock on the Intel part does not compensate for the far smaller execution resource pool. The AMD GPU’s power envelope is 43 W, while the Intel GPU consumes 25 W. The AMD part uses a single 6-pin power connector and suggests a 200 W power supply. The Intel part is an integrated GPU with no power connector and no PSU recommendation.

The AMD card supports PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Intel part uses an integrated graphics processor interface. The AMD card includes dedicated display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The Intel part’s display outputs are portable device dependent. For desktop use with multiple monitors, the AMD card provides fixed connectivity. For mobile or portable devices, the Intel GPU adapts to the host hardware.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series and uses the Navi 33 chip. Its architecture is RDNA 3.0 with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. The generation is listed as Navi III, part of the RX 7000 family. The chip is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses the Wildcat Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture. It falls under the Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake) generation. The process node is 3 nm, produced at Intel’s own foundry. The transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, and transistor density is not recorded. The predecessor for this Intel GPU is listed as HD Graphics-M, with no successor recorded. The AMD part’s predecessor is Navi II, and its successor is Navi IV.

The memory architecture differs fundamentally. The AMD GPU uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus and a memory clock of 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. Bandwidth is a fixed 288.0 GB/s. The Intel GPU has no dedicated memory; size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system shared or system dependent. This makes the Intel GPU’s memory performance a function of the host system’s RAM speed and configuration, which is not a fixed specification.

The AMD GPU’s memory clock operates at 2250 MHz. The Intel GPU’s memory clock is listed as system shared, meaning no fixed memory clock exists. The AMD part’s pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s. The Intel part’s rates are 20.00 GPixel/s and 40.00 GTexel/s, respectively.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The API support is identical, which means software compatibility is not a differentiator. The difference lies entirely in hardware capability beneath those APIs.

The AMD part is a dual-slot discrete card. The Intel part is an IGP, meaning it integrates into a processor package. The AMD card requires a 6-pin power connector and a 200 W suggested power supply. The Intel GPU needs no external power. Physical form factor, power delivery, and thermal design differ accordingly. The AMD card’s TDP is 43 W, while the Intel GPU’s TDP is 25 W.

The release dates differ. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 launched on August 7, 2025. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile launched on April 15, 2026. The Intel GPU’s production status is active. The AMD GPU’s production status is not recorded.

The Verdict

The database shows a clear structural hierarchy. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is a discrete GPU with dedicated memory, high compute throughput, and a large execution resource pool. Its average benchmark score of 2467 places it just ahead of the AMD Radeon 8040S, NVIDIA GeForce 710M, Intel HD Graphics 610, and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M. The margin over its closest rival is 1.1 percent, which is small but consistent across the nearest rival set.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores. Its percentile of 50 is an artifact of missing data, not evidence of mid-range performance. The specification sheet shows a part with 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and 2 ray tracing cores. These numbers place it far below the AMD GPU’s 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores.

For applications that depend on raw FP32 throughput, the AMD GPU delivers 16.49 TFLOPS versus 1.28 TFLOPS for the Intel part. For memory bandwidth, the AMD GPU has a fixed 288.0 GB/s, while the Intel GPU depends on system memory. For pixel fill, the AMD GPU reaches 147.2 GPixel/s against 20.00 GPixel/s. The AMD part wins every quantitative comparison in the database.

The Intel GPU’s advantages are limited to integration and power. It consumes 25 W, has no power connector, and uses an IGP interface. It fits into portable devices with no discrete graphics slot. Its base clock of 300 MHz with a boost of 2500 MHz suggests aggressive power management, but the execution resource pool is too small to compete with the AMD discrete part in any measured workload category.

The data supports a straightforward conclusion. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is the stronger GPU in every recorded specification that affects performance. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile exists in a different product category, serving integrated graphics duties where the AMD part cannot physically fit. For anyone comparing these two based on the database, the AMD GPU is the performance choice, and the Intel GPU is the integration choice.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon RX 7400?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 has an average benchmark score of 2467 across all recorded tests. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 8040S, scores 2440, putting the RX 7400 1.1 percent ahead.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel part has an empty benchmark array, an average score of 0, and an empty nearest rival list. No recorded performance measurements exist for this GPU.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the AMD Radeon RX 7400 have?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What memory does the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile use?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory. Its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as system shared or system dependent, meaning they vary with the host system.

Q: How do the FP32 compute performances compare?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 delivers 16.49 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile delivers 1,280.0 GFLOPS, which is 1.28 TFLOPS. The AMD GPU has more than twelve times the FP32 throughput.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 has a TDP of 43 W, uses a single 6-pin power connector, and suggests a 200 W power supply. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W, uses no power connector, and has no suggested PSU.