AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data for these two accelerators shows almost no overlap in intended function. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM is a compact, single-slot graphics card built around the Navi 33 chip, while the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 is a massive OAM module based on Ponte Vecchio. The AMD part has display outputs and a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, making it suitable for conventional graphics workloads in a desktop or workstation chassis. The Intel part has no display outputs at all, uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, and is designed for compute-oriented data center deployment.

The benchmark data in the database shows no head-to-head results between these two units, and neither part has an average benchmark score recorded. The wins count for both is zero. This means the database has no direct performance comparison to separate them by workload. Instead, the differentiation comes from their physical and architectural characteristics. The AMD card wins in power efficiency and physical footprint: it draws 55 W versus 450 W, uses a single 6-pin power connector, and fits in a 167 mm length. The Intel module requires an 850 W suggested power supply and occupies an OAM form factor, which is not compatible with standard desktop slots.

The Intel part wins on raw compute scale: 44.44 TFLOPS FP32 versus 7.885 TFLOPS for the AMD card, and 96 GB of HBM2e memory versus 8 GB of GDDR6. The memory bandwidth difference is enormous: 2.46 TB/s versus 172.8 GB/s. The Intel module also has 14336 shading units, 896 TMUs, and 112 RT cores, versus 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 28 RT cores for the AMD part. The data indicates the Intel accelerator is built for memory-bound and parallel-heavy workloads, while the AMD card is a functional graphics solution with video outputs.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different manufacturing and design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process, with the chip codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It integrates 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses Generation 12.5 architecture on a 10 nm Intel process, with the Ponte Vecchio chip. It packs 100,000 million transistors on a 1280 mm² die, for a density of 78.1 million per mm². The Intel chip has more than seven times the transistor count and over six times the die area.

Clock behavior differs substantially. The AMD card has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz, with memory clocked at 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective). The Intel module runs at a 750 MHz base and 1550 MHz boost, with memory at 1200 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective). Despite the higher clocks, the Intel part's advantage comes from its massive parallel width and memory subsystem, not from frequency alone.

Memory architecture is the largest single difference. The AMD card uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 172.8 GB/s. The Intel module uses 96 GB of HBM2e on an 8192-bit bus, delivering 2.46 TB/s. That is roughly 14 times the bandwidth and 12 times the capacity. The AMD card has a pixel rate of 70.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 123.2 GTexel/s. The Intel part has a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s, because it has no ROPs, but a texture rate of 1,388.8 GTexel/s, which is over 11 times higher. The absence of ROPs and display outputs confirms the Intel part is not intended for rasterized graphics output.

API support also differs. The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel module supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, with no Vulkan entry in the database. The AMD card also includes 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the Intel module has none.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two products. There are no recorded scores, no percentile comparisons, and no nearest rival data. The only performance indicators are the raw specification fields. The FP32 compute figures are the clearest direct comparison: the Intel part delivers 44.44 TFLOPS, which is 5.64 times the 7.885 TFLOPS of the AMD card. The FP16 figures are identical in ratio, with both parts showing a 1:1 ratio to FP32.

Texture throughput shows an 11.27 times advantage for the Intel module: 1,388.8 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s. Memory bandwidth shows a 14.23 times advantage: 2.46 TB/s versus 172.8 GB/s. The Intel module has 8 times the shading units (14336 versus 1792), 8 times the TMUs (896 versus 112), and 4 times the RT cores (112 versus 28). The AMD card has 64 ROPs, while the Intel part has zero, which is consistent with its lack of display output capability.

Power consumption scales with performance. The Intel module is rated at 450 W TDP, while the AMD card is rated at 55 W. That is an 8.18 times difference in power draw. The suggested power supply figures are 850 W for the Intel module and 250 W for the AMD card. The performance per watt, calculated from the FP32 figures, favors the AMD card: 7.885 TFLOPS divided by 55 W equals 0.143 TFLOPS per watt. The Intel module delivers 44.44 TFLOPS divided by 450 W, which equals 0.0988 TFLOPS per watt. The AMD card is about 1.45 times more efficient in raw FP32 per watt, based on the recorded specifications.

The Verdict

The data points to two entirely different product categories. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM is a low-power, single-slot graphics card with display outputs, a 55 W TDP, and a 250 W suggested PSU. It fits in a 167 mm length and uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 is an OAM module with no display outputs, a 450 W TDP, an 850 W suggested PSU, and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The Intel part has no pixel rate because it lacks ROPs, which means it cannot drive a monitor directly.

For anyone building a system that requires video output, the AMD card is the only viable choice from these two. It supports HDMI 2.1a and DisplayPort 2.1, and it has a complete rasterization pipeline with 64 ROPs. For compute workloads that need massive memory capacity and bandwidth, the Intel module is the clear selection. Its 96 GB of HBM2e and 2.46 TB/s bandwidth are in a different class from the AMD card's 8 GB and 172.8 GB/s.

The release dates show the AMD card was introduced later, on 2025-08-07, while the Intel module came out on 2023-01-09. The Intel part has an active production status, while the AMD card has no recorded status. The Intel module also has a recorded successor, H3C Graphics, while the AMD card's predecessor is Navi II and its successor is Navi IV. The database shows no benchmark scores for either part, so the verdict rests on architectural specifications and intended form factors.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has 2.46 TB/s of bandwidth from 96 GB of HBM2e on an 8192-bit bus. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has 172.8 GB/s from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Can the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 output video to a display?

A: No. The Intel module has no display outputs and a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s, with no ROPs. The AMD card has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD card is rated at 55 W TDP with a 250 W suggested PSU. The Intel module is rated at 450 W TDP with an 850 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Intel module has 14336 shading units, which is 8 times the 1792 shading units on the AMD card.

Q: What are the API differences?

A: The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel module supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, with no Vulkan support recorded.

Q: When was each product released?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM was released on 2025-08-07. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 was released on 2023-01-09.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM | Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 |

|-------|------------------------|--------------------------------|

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Chip | Navi 33 | Ponte Vecchio |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Generation 12.5 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 100,000 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 1280 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 78.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 330 MHz | 750 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1550 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective) | 1200 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 96 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2e |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 8192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 172.8 GB/s | 2.46 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 14336 |

| TMUs | 112 | 896 |

| ROPs | 64 | 0 |

| RT Cores | 28 | 112 |

| Pixel Rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | 0 MPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 1,388.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 7.885 TFLOPS | 44.44 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) | 44.44 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 450 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | OAM Module |

| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 850 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | No outputs |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | None |

| Release Date | 2025-08-07 | 2023-01-09 |

| Production Status | Not recorded | Active |