AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM vs Intel Arc Pro A60 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM contains no benchmark entries, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 has two recorded tests. This asymmetry means the comparison relies entirely on the Arc Pro A60's measured performance and its position relative to other GPUs in the database, with the RX 7400 OEM assessed through its architectural and specification profile rather than direct scores.

The Intel Arc Pro A60 delivers an OpenCL score of 63,485 and a Vulkan score of 57,166 in the database. Its average benchmark score across these tests is 60,326. That average places the Arc Pro A60 at the 88th percentile among all GPUs tracked by the database, a high standing that indicates strong overall compute performance relative to the broader field.

The nearest rivals for the Arc Pro A60 provide useful context. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 records an average score of 60,347, which is effectively identical to the Arc Pro A60's 60,326, showing a delta of 0 percentage points. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 60,140, putting it 0.3 percentage points behind the Arc Pro A60. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M posts 61,896, which is 2.5 percentage points ahead of the Arc Pro A60. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657, placing it 2.8 percentage points behind the Arc Pro A60.

These figures show that the Arc Pro A60 sits in a tightly contested band of professional and workstation GPUs. It is statistically level with the RTX 4090 in this specific average score, marginally ahead of the Radeon Pro Vega 48, and positioned between the faster Radeon Pro W6600M and the slower Radeon PRO V710. The 2.5 percentage point gap to the W6600M and the 2.8 percentage point gap to the V710 define the practical performance envelope for the Arc Pro A60 in this database.

Because the RX 7400 OEM has no benchmark scores, no head-to-head win count can be established. The data shows zero wins for either side in the head-to-head section. The AMD card's percentile ranking of 50 places it at the median of all GPUs, which is far below the Arc Pro A60's 88th percentile. This percentile gap suggests that, based on the database's overall ranking system, the Arc Pro A60 occupies a substantially higher performance tier than the RX 7400 OEM.

FAQ

Q: What benchmark scores does the Intel Arc Pro A60 achieve?

A: The Arc Pro A60 records 63,485 in Geekbench OpenCL and 57,166 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 60,326.

Q: How does the Arc Pro A60 compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The Arc Pro A60's 60,326 average matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090's 60,347 with a 0 percentage point delta. It is 0.3 percentage points ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (60,140), 2.5 percentage points behind the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61,896), and 2.8 percentage points ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58,657).

Q: Does the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the RX 7400 OEM. Its percentile ranking of 50 and average score of 0 reflect this absence of measured results.

Q: What are the memory specifications of each card?

A: The RX 7400 OEM uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro A60 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the power requirement for each card?

A: The RX 7400 OEM has a 55 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Arc Pro A60 has a 130 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 300 W.

Q: How do the shading resources compare between the two GPUs?

A: The RX 7400 OEM has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro A60 has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 16 ray tracing cores.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear performance hierarchy. The Arc Pro A60 holds an 88th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of 60,326, while the RX 7400 OEM sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded scores. For any workload where measured compute performance matters, the Arc Pro A60 is the stronger candidate based on the database's rankings.

The Arc Pro A60 also delivers more memory capacity (12 GB versus 8 GB) and more than double the memory bandwidth (384.0 GB/s versus 172.8 GB/s). Its FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS exceeds the RX 7400 OEM's 7.885 TFLOPS. The Arc Pro A60 further offers FP16 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, whereas the RX 7400 OEM provides 7.885 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, making the Intel card markedly faster for half-precision compute tasks.

The RX 7400 OEM is not without its advantages. It draws 55 W compared to 130 W, a substantial power reduction, and it requires a 250 W PSU instead of 300 W. It also uses a smaller die (204 mm² versus 269 mm²) with a higher transistor density (65.2M per mm² versus 42.8M per mm²), though it packs fewer transistors overall (13,300 million versus 11,500 million on the Intel side). The RX 7400 OEM also has more ray tracing cores (28 versus 16), which could matter in ray-traced workloads despite its lower overall compute ranking.

For users prioritizing measured performance, memory bandwidth, and half-precision compute, the Arc Pro A60 is the data-backed choice. For users prioritizing low power draw, compact dimensions (167 mm length for the AMD card versus no recorded length for Intel), and a larger ray tracing core count, the RX 7400 OEM holds appeal. The 50th percentile ranking for the RX 7400 OEM, however, places it far below the Arc Pro A60's 88th percentile in the database's overall hierarchy.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every major specification field. The RX 7400 OEM uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc Pro A60 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth, exactly double the AMD card's throughput.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The RX 7400 OEM has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz, with memory at 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective). The Arc Pro A60 has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The Intel card runs at significantly higher frequencies across the board.

Compute resources also diverge. The RX 7400 OEM has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 RT cores. The Arc Pro A60 has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 RT cores. The AMD card has fewer shading units and TMUs but more RT cores. Pixel rate for the RX 7400 OEM is 70.40 GPixel/s versus 131.2 GPixel/s for the Arc Pro A60. Texture rate is 123.2 GTexel/s versus 262.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 7.885 TFLOPS versus 8.397 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power and physical specifications differ as well. The RX 7400 OEM has a 55 W TDP with a 250 W suggested PSU and a single 6-pin power connector. The Arc Pro A60 has a 130 W TDP with a 300 W suggested PSU and no listed power connector. Both are single-slot cards. The RX 7400 OEM measures 167 mm in length; the Arc Pro A60 has no recorded dimensions. The RX 7400 OEM uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Arc Pro A60 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 for AMD, versus 4x DisplayPort 2.0 for Intel.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7400 OEM is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, from the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. The Arc Pro A60 uses the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-256 chip from the Alchemist (Pro Series) generation. Both are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the transistor counts and die sizes differ. The RX 7400 OEM has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a density of 65.2M per mm². The Arc Pro A60 has 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, yielding a density of 42.8M per mm².

The RX 7400 OEM's RDNA 3.0 architecture is AMD's latest generation, succeeding Navi II and preceding Navi IV. The Arc Pro A60's Xe-HPG architecture is Intel's Alchemist generation, representing the first discrete GPU architecture from Intel in this product line. The AMD card's release date in the database is 2025-08-07, while the Arc Pro A60's release date is 2023-06-05. The Arc Pro A60 has an active production status; the RX 7400 OEM has no recorded production status.

Ray tracing resources differ in both count and architecture design. The RX 7400 OEM has 28 RT cores, while the Arc Pro A60 has 16. The AMD architecture provides FP16 at a 1:1 ratio to FP32, meaning both data types run at 7.885 TFLOPS. The Intel architecture provides FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, delivering 16.79 TFLOPS, which is more than double its FP32 rate. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The Arc Pro A60 wins decisively in measured compute benchmarks and overall database ranking. Its 88th percentile position and 60,326 average score demonstrate strong performance in OpenCL and Vulkan workloads, as evidenced by its specific test results. The card's 12 GB memory capacity and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth make it suited for memory-intensive tasks such as large dataset processing, high-resolution texture work, and bandwidth-heavy compute applications. Its 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 throughput supports half-precision workloads at a much higher rate than the RX 7400 OEM can manage.

The RX 7400 OEM wins in power efficiency and physical design. Its 55 W TDP is less than half the Arc Pro A60's 130 W, and its 250 W suggested PSU requirement is lower than the 300 W needed for the Intel card. The AMD card's 167 mm length and single-slot design allow installation in space-constrained systems. Its 28 RT cores give it a numeric advantage in ray tracing hardware, and its 13,300 million transistors on a smaller 204 mm² die with 65.2M per mm² density indicate a more compact, dense implementation. The RX 7400 OEM's 1x HDMI 2.1a output adds HDMI connectivity, which the Arc Pro A60 lacks entirely (it offers only DisplayPort 2.0 outputs).

The database's percentile system provides the clearest summary: the Arc Pro A60 at the 88th percentile outperforms the RX 7400 OEM at the 50th percentile in overall GPU hierarchy. The RX 7400 OEM's strengths lie in its low power envelope, compact size, and ray tracing core count, while the Arc Pro A60 dominates in raw compute, memory bandwidth, and FP16 throughput. Each card serves a distinct profile: the Intel card for compute-heavy professional workloads, the AMD card for efficient, space-saving deployments where its architectural advantages apply.