AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM vs Intel Arc A580 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Arc A580 is the clear performance leader based on the recorded data, while the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has no benchmark scores listed in the database. The Arc A580 holds an average benchmark score of 57756, placing it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs tracked. The RX 7400 OEM, by contrast, shows an average score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, which reflects the absence of any recorded test results rather than a literal performance tie.

The Arc A580 delivers specific results across three benchmark tests. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2229. In Geekbench OpenCL, it reaches 91657. In Geekbench Vulkan, it posts 79381. These figures establish the A580 as a functional, measurable product. The RX 7400 OEM has no equivalent scores, meaning the head-to-head comparison is one-sided: the Intel card produces data, the AMD card does not.

The nearest rival data for the Arc A580 provides context for its standing. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM posts an average score of 58085, which is 0.6% higher than the A580. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57367, which is 0.7% lower. The Intel Arc A570M scores 58239, 0.8% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58392, 1.1% higher. These deltas show the A580 clustering tightly with a group of competitors, all within roughly one percentage point of each other. The RX 7400 OEM appears in none of these rival lists, reinforcing its absence from measurable performance data.

Where Each One Wins

The Arc A580 wins in every category where benchmark data exists. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 indicates capability in DirectX 12 workloads. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 points to strong general-purpose compute performance, and its Geekbench Vulkan score of 79381 shows proficiency in Vulkan-based applications. The A580 also holds advantages in raw specifications that feed into performance: 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, 24 ray tracing cores, 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, and 24.58 TFLOPS of FP16 throughput.

The RX 7400 OEM wins on efficiency-oriented traits, but not on measured performance. Its 55 W TDP contrasts sharply with the A580's 175 W TDP. It requires a 250 W suggested power supply versus the A580's 450 W suggestion. It uses a single 6-pin power connector while the A580 needs two 8-pin connectors. It occupies a single slot while the A580 takes two. These factors favor the AMD card in compact or low-power builds, but they do not translate into benchmark wins because no scores exist for the RX 7400 OEM.

Where the RX 7400 OEM does claim advantages is in architectural modernity. It uses RDNA 3.0 architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process, same as the A580, but it features a smaller die at 204 mm² versus 406 mm² and lower transistor count at 13,300 million versus 21,700 million. The AMD card also supports DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the Intel card uses DisplayPort 2.0. These are feature differences, not performance wins.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7400 OEM uses the Navi 33 chip, built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename "Hotpink Bonefish." It belongs to the Navi III generation within the RX 7000 series. The A580 uses the DG2-512 chip, built on Xe-HPG architecture, and belongs to the Alchemist generation within the Arc 5 lineup. Both use a 6 nm process node from TSMC, but the transistor counts diverge: the AMD chip packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a density of 65.2 million transistors per mm². The Intel chip houses 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, yielding 53.4 million per mm². The AMD die is more transistor-dense, while the Intel die is larger overall.

Memory subsystems differ substantially. The RX 7400 OEM uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc A580 also uses 8 GB of GDDR6, but on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s. That is nearly three times the memory bandwidth for the Intel card. The A580's memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, while the RX 7400 OEM runs at 1350 MHz with 10.8 Gbps effective. The bus width difference is the primary driver of the bandwidth gap.

Compute resources scale accordingly. The RX 7400 OEM has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The A580 has 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 24 ray tracing cores. The Intel card has more shading units, TMUs, and ROPs, but fewer ray tracing cores. FP32 throughput measures 7.885 TFLOPS for AMD versus 12.29 TFLOPS for Intel. FP16 throughput is 7.885 TFLOPS for AMD with a 1:1 ratio, while Intel reaches 24.58 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

Clock speeds show a different pattern. The RX 7400 OEM has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz, which are low figures for a modern card. The Arc A580 runs at a 1700 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost. Despite lower clocks, the AMD card achieves its pixel rate of 70.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 123.2 GTexel/s, while the Intel card reaches 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The Intel card's higher clocks and wider pipelines deliver far higher fill rates.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RX 7400 OEM uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the A580 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, giving Intel twice the bus lanes.

The Verdict

The Intel Arc A580 is the only one of these two cards with measurable performance data. Its average benchmark score of 57756 and 87th percentile placement make it a known quantity. The RX 7400 OEM has no recorded scores, an average of 0, and a 50th percentile rank that reflects missing data, not competitive performance. Any buyer looking at the database for measured results will find the A580 as the sole option.

The A580 also wins on raw throughput metrics across the board: higher shading units, higher TMU and ROP counts, more FP32 and FP16 compute, higher pixel and texture rates, and triple the memory bandwidth. Its nearest rivals all cluster within 1.1% of its average score, meaning the A580 is competitively positioned against established GPUs like the RX 5600 OEM and RX 9070 GRE. The RX 7400 OEM appears in no rival comparisons and offers no benchmark evidence to challenge that positioning.

The RX 7400 OEM does hold advantages in power draw and physical footprint. Its 55 W TDP, single 6-pin connector, 250 W suggested PSU, and single-slot design make it suitable for constrained systems. Its 6 nm die is smaller and more transistor-dense, and it supports the newer DisplayPort 2.1 standard. These traits matter for niche builds, but they do not compensate for the absence of any recorded performance data.

The data supports a clear choice: the Arc A580 for any workload requiring measured graphics or compute performance, and the RX 7400 OEM only for scenarios where low power consumption and compact size outweigh the lack of benchmark verification.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has an average benchmark score of 57756, while the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has an average score of 0 with no recorded benchmark results.

Q: How does the memory bandwidth compare between the two cards?

A: The Arc A580 delivers 512.0 GB/s over a 256-bit bus, while the RX 7400 OEM delivers 172.8 GB/s over a 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RX 7400 OEM has a 55 W TDP and requires a 250 W suggested power supply, while the Arc A580 has a 175 W TDP and requires a 450 W suggested power supply.

Q: Which card has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RX 7400 OEM has 28 ray tracing cores, while the Arc A580 has 24, giving AMD a slight edge in that specific count.

Q: Are both cards built on the same manufacturing process?

A: Yes, both use a 6 nm process node from TSMC, but the RX 7400 OEM uses a 204 mm² die with 13,300 million transistors, while the Arc A580 uses a 406 mm² die with 21,700 million transistors.

Q: What display outputs does each card support?

A: The RX 7400 OEM offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Arc A580 offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM | Intel Arc A580 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | DG2-512 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe-HPG |

| Generation | Navi III (RX 7000) | Alchemist (Arc 5) |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 21,700 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 406 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 53.4M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 330 MHz | 1700 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1350 MHz, 10.8 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 172.8 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 3072 |

| TMUs | 112 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 28 | 24 |

| Pixel Rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 7.885 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) | 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 175 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 450 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |

| Release Date | 2025-08-07 | 2023-10-09 |

| Production Status | Not listed | Active |