AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 7600M Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT occupy opposite ends of the Radeon spectrum, separated by architecture generation, physical design, and raw performance class. The RX 7600M is a mobile-first chip built for integration into laptops, while the RX 6950 XT is a desktop flagship designed to be bolted into a full-size tower. Benchmark data shows only one shared test result, yet that single data point, combined with their respective specifications, paints a clear picture of two entirely different use cases. The RX 6950 XT dominates in synthetic compute, while the RX 7600M offers modern RDNA 3.0 features in a package that sips power and requires no external connectors.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 6950 XT wins the only direct head-to-head benchmark available, the Geekbench OpenCL test, by a massive margin. It scores 205,998 points against the RX 7600M’s 63,775 points, a delta of -69% for the mobile part. This is not a close contest; the desktop card delivers over three times the raw compute throughput in this workload. The RX 6950 XT also carries a broader benchmark suite, including scores in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 (4,235), Geekbench Metal (222,653), Geekbench Vulkan (165,212), and multiple Passmark tests, topping out at 28,070 in Passmark G3D. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 58,392, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs.

The RX 7600M, by contrast, has a single recorded benchmark score of 63,775 in Geekbench OpenCL, which matches its average. Its percentile ranking is 89, one point higher than the RX 6950 XT’s 88, despite the far lower absolute score. This apparent contradiction is explained by the benchmark pool: the RX 7600M’s score is compared against a different set of GPUs, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (63,830, -0.1% delta) and the NVIDIA CMP 30HX (63,842, -0.1% delta). The RX 6950 XT’s rivals include the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528, -0.2% delta) and the Intel Arc A570M (58,239, +0.3% delta). The RX 7600M wins in efficiency and portability, but the RX 6950 XT wins in every measurable performance metric.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two is generational. The RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors packed into a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The RX 6950 XT uses the Navi 21 chip on the older RDNA 2.0 architecture, from the Navi II (RX 6000) generation. It is built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 26,800 million transistors spread across a much larger 520 mm² die, giving a lower transistor density of 51.5 million per square millimeter.

Core configurations diverge sharply. The RX 6950 XT has 5,120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, 128 render output units, and 80 ray tracing cores. The RX 7600M has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The desktop card has nearly three times the shading units and more than double the ROPs. Clock speeds tell a different story: the RX 7600M has a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost of 2410 MHz (with a game clock of 2070 MHz), while the RX 6950 XT has a higher base clock of 1860 MHz but a lower boost of 2310 MHz (game clock 2100 MHz). Memory configurations are equally lopsided. The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 6950 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s.

Physical design reinforces the split. The RX 7600M is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors and a 90 W TDP, designed for portable devices with display outputs that are device-dependent. The RX 6950 XT is a triple-slot card, 267 mm long, 120 mm tall, and 50 mm wide, requiring two 8-pin power connectors and a suggested 700 W power supply. The RX 7600M is actively produced, while the RX 6950 XT is end-of-life. The RX 6950 XT launched on 2022-05-09 with a launch MSRP of 1,099 USD; the RX 7600M launched on 2023-01-03 with no recorded MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The single shared benchmark, Geekbench OpenCL, is a decisive victory for the RX 6950 XT. It scores 205,998 against the RX 7600M’s 63,775, a -69% delta relative to the winner. That means the RX 6950 XT is roughly 3.2 times faster in this OpenCL compute test. The RX 7600M’s score is nevertheless respectable for a mobile part, sitting in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in that ranking are the RX 9060 XT LP (63,830, -0.1%) and the CMP 30HX (63,842, -0.1%), both of which it trails by a hair. It beats the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63,693, +0.1%) and trails the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 (64,212, -0.7%).

The RX 6950 XT’s additional benchmarks provide context for its overall strength. Its Geekbench Metal score of 222,653 is its highest single result, followed by OpenCL at 205,998 and Vulkan at 165,212. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 4,235. Passmark results show 28,070 in G3D, 14,199 in GPU compute, and much lower scores in legacy DirectX tests: 303 in DirectX 9, 300 in DirectX 11, 164 in DirectX 10, and 114 in DirectX 12. The G2D score is 1,063. These results place the RX 6950 XT in the 88th percentile, where it slightly trails the P102-100 (58,528, -0.2%) and beats the Arc A570M (58,239, +0.3%).

The RX 7600M has no other recorded benchmarks, so its capabilities beyond OpenCL are inferred from specifications. Its pixel rate is 154.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 269.9 GTexel/s, versus 295.7 GPixel/s and 739.2 GTexel/s for the RX 6950 XT. FP32 compute is 17.27 TFLOPS for the mobile chip and 23.65 TFLOPS for the desktop card. FP16 doubles to 34.55 TFLOPS and 47.31 TFLOPS respectively, both at a 2:1 ratio. The RX 7600M’s memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while the RX 6950 XT runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the RX 6950 XT is the superior performer in raw compute, with a Geekbench OpenCL score more than three times that of the RX 7600M. It also offers 16 GB of memory versus 8 GB, a 256-bit bus versus 128-bit, and 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth versus 256.0 GB/s. Anyone needing maximum desktop compute throughput, particularly in OpenCL or Vulkan workloads, should choose the RX 6950 XT, provided they have a triple-slot chassis, two 8-pin connectors, and a 700 W power supply. Its end-of-life status and 1,099 USD launch MSRP are worth noting, but the performance is undeniable.

The RX 7600M is the choice for portable systems where power draw and physical size are the constraints. Its 90 W TDP, IGP form factor, and no power connectors make it suitable for laptops. It is not competitive with the RX 6950 XT in any shared benchmark, but its 89th percentile ranking shows it is a strong mobile part, trading blows with desktop cards like the RX 9060 XT LP and the CMP 30HX. Its modern RDNA 3.0 architecture and 6 nm process give it a transistor density advantage, but that does not translate into a performance win. Buyers who prioritize mobility and efficiency over absolute speed should pick the RX 7600M; buyers who prioritize performance above all else should pick the RX 6950 XT.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 205,998, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63,775, a -69% delta for the mobile part.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, while the RX 6950 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The RX 7600M has a 90 W TDP with no power connectors, while the RX 6950 XT has a 335 W TDP and requires two 8-pin connectors with a suggested 700 W power supply.

Q: Which architecture is newer?

A: The RX 7600M uses RDNA 3.0 on a 6 nm process, while the RX 6950 XT uses RDNA 2.0 on a 7 nm process.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each?

A: The RX 7600M delivers 256.0 GB/s, while the RX 6950 XT delivers 576.0 GB/s.

Q: Are there additional benchmarks for the RX 7600M?

A: No, the only recorded benchmark for the RX 7600M is Geekbench OpenCL, whereas the RX 6950 XT has results in 3DMark, Geekbench Metal, Geekbench Vulkan, and multiple Passmark tests.